Marijuana in Combination With Opioids in Palliative and Hospice Patients

November 4, 2024 updated by: Theodore Zanker MD, The Connecticut Hospice Inc.

Marijuana in Combination With Opioids for Pain and Symptom Control in Hospice Patients

Study Objectives: Primary reduction of pain and reduction in overall opioid utilization. Secondary improvement in overall patient well being, weight stabilization with increased appetite, improved oxygen saturation, improvement or prevention of nausea and vomiting.

Study Rationale: To determine optimum use and dosing of medical marijuana (CBD:THC) for pain and symptom management.

Study Population: This study specifically will enroll cancer and non-cancer patients as a primary diagnosis suffering from pain and having a terminal illness (defined as having less than 6 months to live) requiring end of life care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Primary Endpoint: Primary reduction of pain and reduction in overall opioid utilization as evidenced by overall reduction in numeric pain scores and MME (Morphine Milliequivalents)

Secondary and Exploratory endpoints:Secondary improvement in overall patient well being, weight stabilization with increased appetite, improved oxygen saturation, improvement or prevention of nausea and vomiting. Endpoints evaluation will be based on change from Baseline using the Modified Edmonton Assessment Scale.

Study design: This will be an open-label study. Patients will choose to participate in a Marijuana adjuvant treatment group, receiving marijuana in combination with standard opioid therapy.

Subject number: Minimum 66 patients

Treatment Duration: Minimum 5 days

Duration of follow up: Patients' initial opioid dose, dosing schedule and numeric pain score will be recorded. For the duration of the study (at least five days) changes in opioid doses and numeric pain scores will be tracked daily.

Marijuana will be administered to the patient via oral route three times daily for at least five days. Patients will receive standardized CBD:THC product provided by NIDA.

On admission to the study, a modified Edmonton Symptom assessment scale to quantify baseline appetite, depression, nausea, vomiting, overall well-being, and anxiety.

Data Tracking: Primary objective tracking will include average numeric pain scores and number of opioid dosage increases and average daily opioid amount (mg equivalents of morphine). Secondary objectives include Weight, Appetite, N/V, O2 Saturation, Self-reported data points from the modified Edmonton Assessment Scale.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Branford, Connecticut, United States, 06405
        • The Connecticut Hospice Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18
  • Alert adults
  • requiring opioids for pain management (routine)
  • cancer diagnosis or non-cancer diagnosis as their terminal illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant women
  • Age < 18
  • minimally or unresponsive patients unable to take oral medications
  • agitated combative patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Single treatment arm
marijuana adjuvant treatment group utilizing scheduled opioid therapy in inpatient hospice hospital setting
Drug: Medical Marijuana
oral capsule, high ratio CBD:THC
Other Names:
  • medical cannabis
  • cannabidiol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Reduction of Pain
Time Frame: minumum 3 days
A numeric pain scale (Units on a scale with the higher number indicating worse pain) was used to assess pain from a range of 0 to 10.
minumum 3 days
Reduction in Overall Opioid Utilization
Time Frame: minimum of 3 days
Reduction in overall opioid utilization was measured in units of mg after converting every patient's opioids into equivalent doses (e.g. 2mg of oral dilaudid = 1/4 oral morphine), with a stabilization or reduction in Morphine Mg Equivalents indicating a positive result.
minimum of 3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Overall Patient Well Being
Time Frame: minimum 3 days
A modified Edmonton Assessment Scale was used. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a questionnaire used to rate the intensity of common symptoms experienced by cancer patients, including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath. A scale of 1 to 10 was used, where, 1 corresponds to the best well-being and 10 corresponds to the worst well-being.
minimum 3 days
Weight Stabilization With Increased Appetite
Time Frame: minimum 3 days

A modified Edmonton Assessment Scale was used. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a questionnaire used to rate the intensity of common symptoms experienced by cancer patients, including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath.

Appetite was analyzed as an ordinal variable where 1 = finished 0~25% of meal, 2 = 25~50% of meal, 3 = 50~75% of meal, 4 = 75~100% of meal.
minimum 3 days
Improved Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: minimum 3 days
Oxygen saturation was reported as a percentage, the greater the % O2 saturation the more positive the outcome.
minimum 3 days
Reduction or Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting
Time Frame: minimum 3 days
A modified Edmonton Assessment Scale was used; the scale is a numeric 0-10 scale (Units on a scale where the higher the number the more nausea and vomiting the patient experienced).
minimum 3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Connecticut Hospice Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Theodore Zanker, MD, The Connecticut Hospice Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WIRB Protocol 20161880-1167645

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Medical Marijuana

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings