Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

September 7, 2020 updated by: Ney Armando Meziat Filho, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With a Combined Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

There is evidence, of a single randomized controlled trial, that CFT is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for chronic low back pain. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings regarding the failure to carry out the intention to treat analysis and a considerable loss of follow-up of patients. As it is, it is important to carry out more studies involving CFT compared to other interventions already used in clinical practice and to correct these methodological shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of Cognitive Functional Therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE-MT group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
148

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • São Paulo
      • Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, 13084-759
        • Instituto da Coluna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Low back pain for more than 3 months
  • Disability score of 14% or more on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
  • Being able to walk independently with or without support
  • Understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Main pain area is not the lumbar spine (from T12 to buttocks)
  • Main pain as leg pain (eg: nerve root compression or herniated disc with radicular pain / radiculopathy, lateral and central stenosis)
  • Less than 6 months after lumbar spine, lower limb or abdomen surgery
  • Invasive procedures for pain relief (ex: epidural injection, rhizotomy) in the last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammatory/rheumatological diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Scheuermann's disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT)
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a behavioral intervention that addresses multiple aspects of low back pain. This approach focuses on changing the patient's beliefs, confronting their fears, educating them about pain mechanisms, increasing mental strength, and control of their body. This is done with functional tasks performed by individuals training them to reduce excessive muscle activity in the trunk and generate behavioral changes related to pain, from postures and provocative movements.
Behavioral: Cognitive Functional Therapy

There will be four main components in the intervention, following the protocol used by O'Keefe et al. (2015):

  1. The cognitive component will focus on on the multidimensional nature of persistent pain about individual beliefs, and how emotions and behaviors (movement and lifestyle) can reinforce a vicious cycle of pain and disability.
  2. Specific Functional training is designed to normalize maladaptive or provocative movement and posture.
  3. Functional integration directed to activities of daily life that are avoided by the patient (rolling in bed, sitting, sitting to standing, walking, bending and lifting)
  4. Patients will be advised to gradually increase physical activity based on their preference, also focusing on sleep hygiene, stress, and management strategies
Active Comparator: Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT)
The active comparator will be the combination of Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT).
Other: Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy
According to the pragmatic clinical decision of the physiotherapist responsible for this intervention arm, participants allocated to the comparison group will be treated with active exercises will involve contractions of abdominal and back muscles in different functional positions, as well as joint mobilization or manipulation techniques applied to the lower back or pélvis, when necessary. Most patients in this group will receive exercises to perform at home, but not related to CFT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END). The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days
8 weeks
Disability associated to low back pain
Time Frame: 8 weeks
It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization
It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END) 13. The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days.
6 and 12 months after randomization
Disability associated to low back pain
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after randomization
It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.
6 and 12 months after randomization
Global impression of recovery
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
It will be evaluated based on the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) which is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ('vastly worse'), through 0 (no change) to +5 (completely recovered).
8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Patient Satisfaction (mediator of outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
This is a simple questionnaire from 1 to 5 asking the patients how satisfied they were with their treatment: 1 = satisfied, 2 = just a little satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = just a little dissatisfied, 5 = dissatisfied
8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Catastrophization (mediator of outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
It will be evaluated by the question "When I feel pain, it's terrible and I feel it's never going to get any better."with the response options ranging from "Never do that" = 0 to "Always do that" = 10.
8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization
Depression (mediator of outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
It will be evaluated by the question "During the past month have you often been bothered by feeling down, depressed or hopeless?" with the response options ranging from "Never" = 0 to "All the time" = 10.
8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Fear of movement (mediator of outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
It will be assessed by the question "Physical activity might harm my back" and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree).
8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Stress (mediator of outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
It will be evaluated by the question "Do you feel stressed? and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree)
8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
Sleep (mediator of outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization
It will be evaluated by the question "Did you have sleep problems last month?" based on Subjective Health Complaints Inventory19. The response options will be "Not at all"=0, "A little"=1, "Some"=2, and "Serious"=3
8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • neymeziat

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Functional Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings