The Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy in Adults With Chronic Neck Pain

March 15, 2026 updated by: George Ploutarchou, European University Cyprus

The Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy in Adults With Chronic Neck Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy compared with Conventional Therapy in treating adults with chronic neck pain

Study Overview

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informer consent will undergo 1 week screening period to determine eligibility for study entry. At week 0, patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized in a single- blind manner (assessor), in a 1:1 ration to cognitive functional therapy or conventional therapy twice a week for 8 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Engomi
      • Nicosia, Engomi, Cyprus, 2404
        • European University of Cyprus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-64
  • Pain in neck area for more than 3 months
  • Pain in NPRS more than 40/100
  • Independently mobile (with or without aids), to be capable of participating in a rehabilitation program twice a week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious psychological pathology
  • recently surgery on shoulder or neck area (<6 months)
  • Pain relieving procedures such as injection based therapy (e.g epidurals) and day case procedures (e.g rhizotomy) in the last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Rheumatologic/inflammatory disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis, lupus, scheuermann's disease)
  • Progressive neurological disease (e.g. multiple sclerosis (MS), parkinson's disease (PD), motor neuron disease (MND)
  • Unstable cardiac conditions
  • Red flag disorders like malignancy/cancer, acute traumas like fracture (<6 months ago) or infection, spinal cord compression/cauda equina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Functional Therapy

Participants will received in this group four main component:

  1. Pain education, cognitive education, explanation about their health condition, self management education
  2. Graded exposure to painful movements or activities
  3. Movement therapy targeted to their functional integration
  4. Lifestyle programme.

Cognitive functional therapy (CFT) is a novel intergraded behavioral approach for individualizing the management of spinal pain, targeting the bio-psycho-social factors of rehabilitation, and enabling the patient to self-manage the condition.

CFT lies within the broad spectrum of the biopsychosocial approach for the management of spinal pain. CFT uses a multidimensional clinical reasoning framework with aim to enable the clinician to identify modifiable components of the condition, evaluate patients' behavioral responses to pain, and compose and drive a tailored rehabilitation program mainly based on self-management. The intervention is comprised by the interplay on "making sense of pain", "exposure with control", and "lifestyle change".

Other Names:
  • CFT
Active Comparator: Conventional Therapy

Participants will received in this group four main component:

  1. Tens therapy
  2. Massage to cervical and shoulder area
  3. Relaxation techniques
  4. Posture exercises
  5. Workplace education
Each individual session involve a combination of pain management with electrotherapy, massage and relaxation techniques. Also include some posture exercise these will be targeted on body alignment to the neutral position, and strengthening the whole neck area. strengthening program will be include isometrics on all cervical movements with a band which progressively increase the resistance of the band by change it and process to exercise against the band resistant. The relaxation/mindfulness component will take place at the end of each class and will involve breathing and relaxation of the body.
Other Names:
  • CT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical rating scale
Time Frame: Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
Measured pain intensity with 0 no pain and 100 the worst pain ever.
Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)

This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life.

0= no disability 100= severe disability

Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)

The Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) is a patient reported questionnaire which specifically focuses on how a patient's fear avoidance beliefs about physical activity and work may affect and contribute to their low back pain and resulting disability.

The questionnaire consists of 16 items in which a patient rates their agreement with each statement on a 7-point Likert scale. Where 0= completely disagree, 6=completely agree. There is a maximum score of 96. A higher score indicates more strongly held fear avoidance beliefs.

Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
Short Fort 12
Time Frame: Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning
Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
EurQqol 5
Time Frame: Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)

An EQ-5D health state is the set of responses to the 5 dimensions of EQ-5D, as completed by a patient or respondent.

Values are anchored at 1 (full health) and 0 (a state as bad as being dead) as required by their use in economic evaluation. Values less than 0 represent health states regarded as worse than a state that is as bad as being dead.

Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
Range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
Range of motion in all cervical movement, flexion, extension, side flexion, rotations
Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
Isometric Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)
Strength in all cervical movement, flexion, extension, side flexion, rotations
Baseline (after randomization), at 4th week (after 8th session), at 8th week (after 16th session), 3 months (after randomization)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0101100333

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Functional Therapy

Subscribe