Study for Antibiotic Impregnated Calcium Sulfate Beads as Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection

July 17, 2018 updated by: McMaster University

Pilot Study for Antibiotic Impregnated Calcium Sulfate Beads as Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection in Vascular Surgery Patients

The CDC quotes a rate of wound infection of 2-5% for inpatient surgery. Patients undergoing a vascular operation, however, are generally at an increased risk of wound infection with rates often close to 5-10%. Groin incisions are an additional risk factor for surgical site infections, with rates of wound infection being quoted from 10-15%, and even as high as 30% in high risk patients. The use of implantable calcium sulfate beads mixed with antibiotics may help to lower the rate of infection in these high risk patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The initial pilot will consist of 30 patients per arm and will provide estimates of effect size, event rates, and recruitment rates. It will mirror the final study in terms of methodology. This will occur at the Hamilton General Hospital (Hamilton, ON. Canada)

Patients will be randomized to either the exposure group or control group by the study coordinator. Patients will be block randomized among surgeons (6), so that each surgeon has an equal number of patients in the control and exposure arms. Randomization will occur once an operative date has been booked for a patient. The arm they are assigned to will be how the patient is treated, regardless of if they are cancelled and re-booked. Should patients be done as an emergency procedure, prior to their index procedure (when the beads would be implanted), they will be excluded from the study. As no intervention has occurred at this point, there will be no informative loss to follow-up or censoring and therefore this will not impact validity of the design. We are unable to provide beads for emergency procedures, as the research pharmacy is not open.

The research coordinator will inform the research pharmacy to produce calcium sulfate beads impregnated with Vancomycin (1g) and Tobramycin (240mg) for the exposure arm. The control arm will receive standard care. The only difference between standard care and the treatment arm is the use of the antibiotic calcium sulfate beads. Beads will be delivered in a sterile manner to the OR. For each patient half of a standard 10cc kit will be delivered (5cc of Stimulan Calcium Sulfate). As the beads are being applied only to a groin incision(s) this will provide an adequate volume of beads. It will also prevent insertion of excess beads.

Surgeons will insert the beads loosely within the soft tissue of groin incisions, so as not to distort the normal anatomy. This technique will be discussed with all surgeons prior to pilot initiation as a group. This will aim to standardize the method among involved surgeons. At the end of the study we will complete a focus group with surgeons to discuss their experience using the beads to better inform the protocol for the final RCT. Patients are randomized as a unit and therefore, if there are bilateral groin incisions, both will be treated as per their randomization.

Patients will be blinded to which treatment they receive. The beads are believed to be non-detectable to the patient. Only by means of wound dehiscence would a patient be expected to determine their treatment group. For practical reasons the surgeon cannot be blinded to treatment. Nurse assessors and study authors conducting review of patient records will be blinded to patient treatment.

Patients will be recruited from all patients consented for an included procedure at HGH. A study coordinator or a resident will obtain consent. The patient's primary physician will not be involved in the consent process.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2
        • Recruiting
        • Hamilton General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael C Stacey
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Brandon McGuinness

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged > 18
  • Undergoing a revascularization procedure involving the femoral artery and requiring either unilateral or bilateral groin incision
  • BMI > 30
  • Presence of one of the following: current smoker, diabetes requiring pharmacologic intervention, previous re-vascularization procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient with a current infection or requiring ongoing use of antibiotics
  • Any patient who otherwise has an indication requiring the use of antibiotic impregnated material
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to tobramycin or vancomycin
  • Grade 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease
  • Moderate or severe hypercalcemia
  • Any woman currently pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant during the course of the study
  • Any patient involved in another study that, in the investigators opinion, is believed will interfere with the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Standard of Care
Patients will receive the standard of care for vascular procedures as it is provided at Hamilton General Hospital
Other: Standard of Care
Standard of care provided at Hamilton General Hospital consisting of dressings for the wound.
Experimental: Antibiotic Impregnated Beads
Patients will have their wound packed with calcium sulfate beads prior to closing. The beads will be infused with the antibiotics vancomycin and tobramycin.
Device: Stimulan Rapid Cure
Calcium sulfate dissolvable beads
Drug: Vancomycin
0.5 g Vancomycin per patient
Drug: Tobramycin
120 mg tobramycin per patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Site Infection
Time Frame: 30 days
The primary outcome will be combined, superficial, deep or organ/space infection as defined by the CDC. The CDC definition for surgical site infection is one of the most widely used and is both the NSQUIP and NHSN definition.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Complication Rate
Time Frame: 30 day
Wound complications will be defined as: wound dehiscence, skin edge necrosis, hematoma, seroma, increased wound exudate, graft exposure. These will be measured with a standardized form, by the blinded nurse assessor, at each follow-up appointment. They will additionally be assessed by the author reviewing patient records at thirty days. If imaging is required for diagnosis of hematoma or seroma, the result will be collected from the imaging records, and treated as consistent with the conclusions of the formal imaging report.
30 day
Surgical Graft Infection Rate
Time Frame: 90 day
Graft infection is defined as; diagnosis by surgeon or surgical designate requiring re-operation or prolonged course of antibiotic therapy. An author blinded to patient treatment will review the records of the patient including patient charts, antibiotic prescriptions, home care and ID referrals and record the information in a standardized form for this endpoint.
90 day
Bacterial Resistance
Time Frame: 30 day
In the event of infection requiring laboratory samples, screening for resistant bacteria will be performed. Bacterial cultures will be performed in order to determine the presence of tobramycin or vancomycin resistant strains.
30 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McMaster University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael C Stacey, DS, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Antimicrobial Beads

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Individual patient data will not be shared for this pilot study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Site Infection

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings