Psychosocial Characteristics and Non-pharmacological Intervention of Patients With Treatment-resistant Depression

May 6, 2021 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

A Prospective Study on the Psychosocial Characteristics and Non-pharmacological Intervention of Patients With Treatment-resistant Depression

Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, effective management strategies for treatment-resistant depression are limited and yet to be developed. However, nursing interventions focusing on adherence enhancement, symptom reduction, and stress management may be strategic for a better disease management. This study aimed to define the rarely-studied concept of TRD under the cultural context of Taiwan and to identify new feasible and complementary treatment model from nursing perspectives. The project had established important basis on the descriptions of psychosocial features and need assessment of people with TRD over psychiatrist's validation. The findings also built up a cultural-specific non-pharmacological intervention module for effective TRD management in Taiwan. The nursing model of TRD management will further promote the development of integrative depression care in the future and complement current modalities, while providing important evidence-based information for future research and services.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The three-year pioneering project began with observing the psychosocial characteristics and demographic profile of a group of TRD cohort, followed by validating the cultural meanings and recovery constructs of TRD through professional and lay focus groups in the first year. In the second to third year, we examined the effectiveness of a 8-week, nurse-led psychosocial intervention with group approach in a randomized control trial (RCT) compared to the controls receiving usual care with three follow-ups. Detailed psychiatric assessment and study interviews have been performed at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months after the intervention by a senior psychiatrist and a research assistant using standardized operation forms.Structured measurements have been utilized to collect primary outcome variables of psychological distress, suicide risk and resilience as well as secondary outcome measures of quality of life, community reintegration level, perceived satisfaction, and main clinical variables (e.g., treatment adherence, service use such as ER/OPD attendance or hospitalization days). The control group receives usual care of pharmacological therapy provided by the psychiatrists in the Psychiatric Department of the study hospital in northern Taiwan.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Chia-Yi Wu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 20-85 ;
  2. To be diagnosed with Major Depressive disorder or Bipolar II disorder;
  3. Failed to respond to at least three weeks of two antidepressant trials ;
  4. Able to communicate with Mandarin or Taiwanese ;
  5. No severe or foreseeing cognitive impairment during study period judged by the co-PI；
  6. Willing to sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to cooperate due to psychiatric symptom disturbance ;
  2. Unwilling to provide most information in the questionnaire ;
  3. Severely suicidal during study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention Group
The intervention group will receive a 8-week nurse-led psychosocial care group,which involve 90 minutes session every week.
Behavioral: Nurse-led cognitive-behavioral-based group intervention
The intervention focused on the following topics of symptom awareness(i.e. provision of literacy in depression and stress), stress management, lifestyle restructuring and emotional self-care. These topics have been integrated as four major domains for discussions in the eight-weekly sessions. Each session starts with open discussion for participants' daily concerns to activate group dynamics, followed by second part of domain-oriented discussions, and then the third part of session review and homework reminder.
No Intervention: Control Group
The control group will receive usual care, which refers to the pharmacological therapy provided by psychiatrists in the Psychiatric Department.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of score of the Brief Symptom Rating Scale(BSRS-5) for psychological distress level
Time Frame: Baseline assessment and follow up sessions on 3,6, and 9 months
The full scale contains five items of psychopathology: (1) anxiety; (2) depression; (3) hostility; (4) interpersonal sensitivity: inferiority; and (5) insomnia. An extra question "Do you have any suicide ideation?" is added at the end of the scale. It is a 5-item Likert scale (scores of 0 to 4) for assessment of psychological distress level by self-report of by interview. The rating of symptoms is based on a 5-point scale: 0, not at all; 1, a little bit; 2, moderately; 3, quite a bit; 4, extremely. Total score will be calculated based on the 5 questions with a maximum score of 20, where a higher score indicates higher level of psychological distress and poorer mental health status in the past week.
Baseline assessment and follow up sessions on 3,6, and 9 months
The change of score in 9-item Concise Mental Health Checklist (CMHC-9) for suicide risk assessment
Time Frame: Baseline assessment and follow-up session on the 9th month
The CMHC-9 is consisted of 9 items assessing psychopathgology (5 items) and suicide risk (4 items). The five item evaluated recent mental distress, lending the measurement from the BSRS-5, i.e., insomnia, anxiety, hostility, depression, and inferiority. The four items reflecting several key suicide risk factors, including lifetime suicide attempt, future suicide intent, alcohol or drug abuse history, and lack of social support. Each item was rated by 0/1, indicating the existence of each symptom, with a total score ranging from 0 to 9. The higher the score, the higher the risk of suicide. The cutoff at 4 points indicates a higher overall suicide risk among clinical or community population.
Baseline assessment and follow-up session on the 9th month
Change of score in Brief Resilience Coping Scale (BRCS) for tendencies to cope with stress
Time Frame: Baseline assessment and follow up sessions on 3,6, and 9 months
It is a 4-item measurement tool designed to assess the ability of an individual to cope with stress in a resilient fashion. The response consists of five options at which 1 means the statement "does not describe you at all" and 5 means "it describes you very well". The score is then added up.Among general public, the score of 4-13 indicates low resilient copers; 14-16 indicates medium resilient copers; and 17-20 indicates high resilient copers. However, the scores will undergo validation among a cohort of TRD patients in this study.
Baseline assessment and follow up sessions on 3,6, and 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R) for the participants' level of community integration
Time Frame: Follow up sessions on 3, 6, and 9 months
CIQ-R consists of four domains: home integration, social integration, productivity, andelectronic social networking score. The scale contains 18 items. The home integration subscale is made up of 5 items at which each item is scored from 0-2, where 2 indicates highest degree of integration. The Social Integration subscale consists 6 items with the same scoring method mentioned above. The productivity subscale consists of 4 questions with a total points of 7. The electronic social networking subscale consists of 3 questions with a total points of 6. Scores of these subscales are then added up as an overall CIQ score. Maximum score is 35, which represents maximum community reintegration.
Follow up sessions on 3, 6, and 9 months
EQ-5D questionnaire for quality of life
Time Frame: Follow up sessions on 3, 6, and 9 months
The EQ-5D is a self-completed questionnaire which contains five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety-depression. The level of function in each dimension is classified into three degrees of disability, which is level 1(no disability), level 2(moderate disability), and level 3(severe disability). These responses will then generate a 5-digit descriptor ranging from 1-1-1-1-1 indicating perfect health to 3-3-3-3-3 indicating worth possible state. It is accompanied by a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) to assess perceived health conditions, which ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Follow up sessions on 3, 6, and 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Taiwan University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Chia-yi Wu, PhD, National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 22, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201612198RINB

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings