Rapid Assessment of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Risk Test (REACT)

October 16, 2024 updated by: Julian A Abrams, MD, Columbia University

The Acceptability of a Rapid Assessment of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Risk Test (REACT)

This study aims to evaluate the acceptability of a new non-invasive screening device to test for Barrett's esophagus. The investigators will prospectively enroll 100 patients to undergo Cytosponge testing. The time of involvement for an individual will range from 2 weeks to 2 months, depending on the results of the Cytosponge test and time to follow up endoscopy, if indicated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has risen over the past half century and continues to have a dismal prognosis. Even though it has been established that Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor lesion to EAC, more than 90% of EAC patients are never diagnosed with BE beforehand. Thus, the opportunity is missed to identify most patients at high risk for EAC who could benefit from surveillance and early endoscopic therapy, which in turn may lower EAC mortality. Upper endoscopy is the only means to diagnose BE, yet widespread endoscopic screening is impractical and expensive. There is an urgent need to develop minimally-invasive methods of BE screening that can be easily performed in the primary care setting to allow for efficient and cost-effective interventions to decrease EAC mortality.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
51

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Males:

Ages 50-75 and at least one of the following:

  • Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)* or
  • Family history (first degree relative) with Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma or
  • Both body mass index (BMI) ≥30 or
  • A history of cigarette smoking (at least 10 pack years)

Females:

Ages 50-75 and GERD* and at least one of the following:

  • Family history (first degree relative) with Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma or
  • BMI ≥30 or
  • A history of cigarette smoking (at least 10 pack years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of gastric or esophageal cancer
  • History of esophageal surgery
  • Known untreated esophageal stricture or uninvestigated dysphagia
  • Previous upper endoscopy within 10 years
  • Cancer within 3 years except for non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Portal hypertension, with or without known varices
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy
  • Uncontrolled major comorbid illness
  • Inability to tolerate or contraindication to upper endoscopy
  • Inability to give informed consent

GERD defined as either a history of frequent heartburn or fluid regurgitation symptoms (at least weekly for 6 months) or regular use of proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Cytosponge Test
This arm will include individuals without formal diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.
Device: Cytosponge
The Cytosponge consists of a 3cm diameter, polyester, medical grade spherical sponge on a string, compressed within a gelatin capsule. The capsule is swallowed while the patient or the research specialist holds onto the string. After 3-5 minutes the gelatin capsule dissolves allowing the spherical sponge to expand. The sponge is then retrieved by gently pulling on the string, thus collecting cells along the passageway through the entire length of the esophagus. The sample is then put into a preservative to be processed for immunohistochemical testing for trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) to determine diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation Rate
Time Frame: 1 Day
Participation rate is defined as the percent of patients who agree to undergo Cytosponge testing among number of eligible patients offered Cytosponge testing.
1 Day
Patient Tolerability Determined by Score on Likert Scale
Time Frame: 1 Day
After undergoing the Cytosponge test, subjects will be asked to take a "Cytosponge Post-Procedure Questionnaire" to assess tolerability using a Likert scale from 1 (no discomfort) to 10 (severe discomfort) and whether they would be willing to undergo Cytosponge testing again (yes/no). The scale for each question is rated 1 to 10. Lower scores are "better" (greater tolerability for that particular measure), higher scores are "worse" (less tolerable for that particular measure). Each question on the questionnaire will be assessed independently (i.e. one score per question). No total scores are calculated.
1 Day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time Frame: 1 Day
The PPV is the proportion of patients with endoscopic and histologic evidence of Barrett's esophagus on upper endoscopy from the total number of patients with TFF3-positive Cytosponge test who undergo a follow up endoscopy.
1 Day
Number of Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: 1 Day
Total number of all AEs related to Cytosponge testing
1 Day
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: 1 Day
Total number of all SAEs related to Cytosponge testing
1 Day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Julian Abrams, MD, MPH, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 19, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 19, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAR5884

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Barrett Esophagus

Clinical Trials on Cytosponge

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings