Volunteer-Delivery of Behavioral Activation

October 22, 2020 updated by: Patrick Raue, University of Washington

Volunteer-Delivery of Behavioral Activation for Senior Center Clients

In response to large numbers of senior center clients who suffer untreated depression and the dearth of geriatric mental health providers, the investigators have simplified a Behavioral Activation intervention to match the skill set of age-matched lay volunteers available to senior centers (Volunteer BA). This R34 proposes developmental work on delivering Volunteer BA in senior centers, so as to arrive to a sustainable intervention with standardized procedures. The investigators follow with a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the comparative impact of Volunteer BA versus MSW-provided BA on increased client activity and reduced depressive symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Senior centers provide social, health, nutritional, and recreational services to older adults. Ten percent of older adults in these settings experience clinically significant depression. Although many aging services now screen for depressive symptoms, an IOM report indicates that the number of geriatric mental health providers nationally is insufficient. Further complicating treatment delivery is the reluctance of depressed elders to accept a mental health referral or pursue treatment. It has been proposed that lay workers may be able to offer psychosocial interventions for geriatric mental health disorders. Lay volunteer-delivered interventions may improve depression outcomes, may do so by engaging the same target variables as professionally-delivered interventions, and may be both more cost effective and acceptable to seniors. Limitations include uncertainties about training and supervision needs, reliable methods to assure intervention fidelity and patient safety, and comparability of outcomes to those attained by professionally- delivered interventions. Building on senior centers' volunteer programs, this proposal utilizes senior volunteers to meet the mental health needs of depressed urban clients. To this end, the investigators simplified Behavioral Activation (BA) to match the skill set of lay senior volunteers (Volunteer BA). The investigators chose BA because it is an effective treatment for late-life depression, can be administered by paraprofessionals, and its primary mechanism (target) of action has been validated by efficacy studies. Based on preliminary data, the investigators aim to test the feasibility and acceptability of Volunteer BA for an underserved and difficult to engage population. The investigators propose further developmental work on the delivery of Volunteer BA in senior centers, so as to arrive at a sustainable intervention with standardized procedures. The investigators propose a small RCT testing the impact of Volunteer BA versus MSW-delivered standard BA on increased client activity (the target) and reduced depressive symptoms (clinical outcome). The Volunteer BA delivery model: 1. Makes use of existing volunteer resources; 2. has potential for being an acceptable and sustainable intervention; and 3. is expected to engage BA targets. However, its capacity to yield comparable outcomes to MSW-delivered BA is yet to be determined.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
55

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98103
        • Greenwood Senior Center
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98103
        • Wallingford Senior Center
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98118
        • Southeast Senior Center
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98144
        • Central Area Senior Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Referral to study (stage 1):

  1. Age ≥ 60 years.
  2. Attends one of 4 participating Seattle senior centers.
  3. PHQ-9 score of ≥10 via routine screening.

Research assessment (stage 2):

  1. Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) ≥ 24.
  2. Capacity to provide written consent for both research assessment and the BA intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current passive or active suicidal ideation (SCID-V or HAM-D).
  2. Presence of psychiatric diagnoses other than unipolar, non-psychotic major depression or anxiety disorder by SCID-V.
  3. Severe or life-threatening medical illness (e.g., end stage organ failure).
  4. Inability to speak English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Volunteer-delivered Behavioral Activation
Behavioral: Volunteer-delivered Behavioral Activation
Behavioral Activation as delivered by trained volunteers
Active Comparator: MSW-delivered Behavioral Activation
Behavioral: MSW-delivered Behavioral Activation
Behavioral Activation as delivered by trained MSWs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (range 0-150; higher scores indicate higher levels of activation) change score from baseline to 9 weeks
Baseline and 9 weeks
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for Depression (range 0-76; higher scores indicate greater severity of depression) change score from baseline to 9 weeks
Baseline and 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Washington

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Patrick J Raue, PhD, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00002543
  • R34MH111849 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings