Diagnostic Accuracy of FDG PET/CT of Cranial Arteries in GCA

January 18, 2018 updated by: University of Aarhus

Conventional FDG PET/CT Accurately Diagnoses Temporal Arteritis in Glucocorticoid-naïve GCA Patients: a Case-control Study

A case-control study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG uptake in cranial arteries by FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Although older studies argue that FDG PET/CT cannot demonstrate inflammation in cranial arteries, e.g. temporal and maxillary arteries, the resolution of modern PET systems may have improved, making a case for FDG PET/CT. FDG PET/CT is increasingly used in giant cell arteritis (GCA) diagnosis due to its excellent diagnostic accuracy considering large-vessel involvement. In case of uncommon distribution of vessel involvement or marginally increased large-vessel FDG uptake, FDG PET/CT-specificity may be compromised. Hence, recognising FDG uptake in cranial arteries potentially adds to FDG PET/CTs diagnostic accuracy.

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of conventional FDG PET/CT of the cranial arteries in the diagnosis of GCA.

Methods In a cohort of consecutively included glucocorticoid-naïve patients suspected of new-onset GCA, patients with a clinical GCA diagnosis will be identified. Conventional FDG PET/CT and vascular ultrasound(US) was performed before treatment. Patients were referred for a temporal artery biopsy (TAB).

Controls are age-(+/- 3 years) and sex-matched malignant melanoma (MM) patients who had a follow-up metastatic-disease-free FDG PET/CT ≥6 months after MM resection.

Images will be assessed by 5 nuclear medicine physicians blinded to clinical symptoms and findings. Temporal (TA), maxillary (MA) and vertebral (VA) arteries will be visually assessed. Arterial FDG uptake more than FDG uptake in surrounding tissue is considered positive. Sensitivity, specificity and interreader agreement will be evaluated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
106

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Department of rheumatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients are sampled from tertiary hospital. Cases are identified in an established cohort of patients suspected og GCA in whom clinical assessment, including imaging procedures were performed before treatment.

Controls are sampled among malignant melanoma patients who had a clinically indicated follow-up FDG PET/CT to evaluate disease freedom/progression.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Cases:

  • 1) age ≥50 years, 2) CRP>15mg/l or ESR>40mm/h, 3) either a) cranial symptoms, b) new-onset extremity claudication or c) weight loss >5 kilograms or fever>38oC for >3 weeks and a clinical diagnosis of giant cell arteritis judged by expert rheumatologist.

Controls:

  • age-(+/-3 years) and sex-matched malignant melanoma (MM) patients
  • follow-up metastatic-disease-free FDG PET/CT ≥6 months after MM resection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of polymyalgia or giant cell arteritis
  • immunosuppresive treatment within last month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
GCA cases
In a cohort of patients suspected of GCA based on the following inclusion criteria were 1) age ≥50 years, 2) CRP>15mg/l or ESR>40mm/h, 3) either a) cranial symptoms, b) new-onset extremity claudication or c) weight loss >5 kilograms or fever>38oC for >3 weeks, patients with a clinical diagnosis of GCA is identified.
Radiation: FDG PET/CT
Conventional FDG PET/CT including head in order to asses cranial arteries.
Other Names:
  • Inflammatory biomarkers
  • Temporal artery biopsy
  • Vascular ultrasound
controls
Age-(+/- 3 years) and sex-matched malignant melanoma (MM) patients who had a follow-up metastatic-disease-free FDG PET/CT ≥6 months after MM resection
Radiation: FDG PET/CT
Conventional FDG PET/CT including head in order to asses cranial arteries.
Other Names:
  • Inflammatory biomarkers
  • Temporal artery biopsy
  • Vascular ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PET positivity
Time Frame: Time of diagnosis/pre-treatment (cases)
Presence of FDG uptake in temporal, maxillary and/or vertebral arteries assessed in order to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of PET of cranial arteries in the diagnosis of GCA
Time of diagnosis/pre-treatment (cases)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Full-fillment of ACR criteria
Time Frame: Time of diagnosis
PET sensitivity and specificity in the subpopulation of GCA patients full filling ACR criteria
Time of diagnosis
Temporal artery biopsy
Time Frame: Time of diagnosis
Correlation between temporal artery biopsy result and temporal artery FDG uptake
Time of diagnosis
Temporal artery ultrasound
Time Frame: Time of diagnosis
Correlation between temporal artery ultrasound result and temporal artery FDG uptake
Time of diagnosis

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Aarhus

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Lars Christian Gormsen, MD, PhD, Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET centre, Aarhus University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Cranial_GCA_PET

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Giant Cell Arteritis

Clinical Trials on FDG PET/CT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings