Pain Management Support Study for Patients With Advanced Cancer

February 18, 2022 updated by: Joke Bradt, Drexel University

Mechanisms of Music Therapy to Palliate Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Chronic pain is one of the most feared symptoms in people with cancer. Insufficient relief from pharmacological treatments and the fear of side effects are important reasons for the growing use of complementary pain management approaches in cancer care. On such approach is music therapy. Although several studies have demonstrated that music therapy interventions can reduce pain in people with cancer, few studies have examined the therapeutic mechanisms that explain how music therapy interventions lead to improved pain management. The purpose of this study is to examine whether an interactive music therapy intervention improves psychological and social factors that play an important role in chronic pain management in people with advanced cancer. The findings will contribute towards the optimization of music therapy for palliation of chronic pain in people with advanced cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study addresses the public health problem of chronic pain as one of the most feared symptoms in people with cancer, with 70% to 90% of patients with advanced disease reporting pain. Unrelieved pain remains a challenge in cancer care. Insufficient relief from pharmacological treatments and the fear of side effects are important reasons for the growing use of complementary pain management approaches in people with cancer. One such approach is music therapy. Although efficacy of music therapy for pain has been established, there are no mechanistic studies clarifying how it works in clinical populations. Thus, there is a lack of knowledge related to 1) therapeutic mechanisms that lead to improvement (mediator effects) and 2) the relationship between patient characteristics and treatment response (moderator effects). Yet, it is well accepted that knowledge of mediators and moderators as well as a validated theory of action (i.e., how the intervention activates the mediators) are needed to optimize psychosocial treatment interventions. Therefore, the overarching goals of this study are to 1) examine mediators and moderators hypothesized to account for the pain-reducing effects of Interactive Music Therapy (IMT) in people with advanced cancer and chronic pain and 2) validate IMT's theory of action. The mediation model to be tested in this study aligns with a biopsychosocial framework to palliation of chronic pain and is based on findings from a preliminary study. The investigators postulate that anxiety, mood, self-efficacy and perceived support mediate the effects of IMT on pain outcomes (i.e. pain intensity and pain interference). In addition, the impact of several moderators on the hypothesized mediation model, namely adult playfulness, perceived musical competence, and treatment expectancy, will be tested. This study uses a mixed methods intervention design in which qualitative data (i.e. semi-structured follow-up interviews) are embedded within a randomized controlled trial. A total of 100 outpatients with advanced cancer and chronic bone pain will be randomized to one of two 6-week treatments: 1) Interactive Music Therapy or 2) Verbal-based support. The mediators and pain outcomes will be measured at baseline and after the fourth and sixth session using self-report measures as well as biomarkers (salivary cortisol, lachrymal dopamine content, serum oxytocin, and plasma β-endorphins). Follow-up interviews with a subsample of 30 participants will enable the investigators to examine the congruence between the hypothesized mediators and moderators and participant explanations of how IMT influences chronic pain management (i.e. theory of action). This study will contribute towards the optimization of music therapy for palliation of chronic pain in people with advanced cancer through a better understanding of the impact of mediators and moderators of IMT on chronic pain management. The results of this study will provide estimated effects sizes of IMT on the mediators and preliminary effect size estimates for the pain outcomes. This information will be instrumental in the development of a subsequent large-scale efficacy trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
103

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102
        • Hahnemann University Hospital
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19124
        • Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female outpatients with advanced cancer (Stage 3 & 4; or relapse refractory patients for myeloma)
  • diagnosed with locally advanced cancer that has extended to organs/soft tissue or is impinging on or eroding the bone; or bone metastases or soft tissue metastasis
  • moderate to severe pain with an average intensity ≥4 on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
  • experiencing pain for ≥ 3 months
  • Karnofsky Performance score of ≥ 60 or the Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status (ECOG) equivalent of ≤ 2 (i.e. requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of their personal needs)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • expected survival ≤ 3 months
  • primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor or CNS metastatic disease that impairs concentration, memory, balance or focus that would preclude ability to participate in a 60 minute, recurring activity and completion of self-report measures
  • hematologic malignancies except for myeloma which causes significant bone pain
  • ≤ 3 weeks post-operation from start of study
  • active psychosis or dementia
  • inability to speak or write English
  • moderate to severe hearing impairment
  • current smoking
  • current alcohol dependence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Interactive Music Therapy
Six 45-minute individual interactive music therapy sessions.
Behavioral: Interactive Music Therapy
Six 45-minute individual interactive music therapy (IMT) sessions delivered by a board-certified music therapist. Sessions start with music-guided breathing, imagery, or humming. The music therapist then engages the participant in singing of familiar songs and co-created vocal or instrumental music improvisations based on patient needs. Discussion about the meaning assigned to songs and emotions expressed through the improvisations follow. The IMT experiences are aimed at facilitating emotional expression, offering support through interactive music making, and strengthening inner resources of creativity. In addition, each week the participant learns music-based techniques for self-management of anxiety, stress, mood, and pain.
Active Comparator: Verbal-based support
Six 45-minute individual verbal support sessions
Behavioral: Verbal support
Six 45-minute individual sessions delivered by a master's level clinician with training in counseling. The sessions are focused on patient-initiated conversations about their pain, life stressors and the impact on their daily life. The intervener provides nondirective, supportive care by offering supportive, validating statements and reflective listening. The intervener refrains from employing active suggestion, problem-solving or behavioral or cognitive therapy techniques. The verbal support sessions are aimed at providing an empathic, therapeutic environment to facilitate emotional expression and sharing of worries and fears.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
measured by PROMIS® Pain Intensity-Short Form (SF)3a
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Pain Interference
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
measured by PROMIS® Cancer-Pain Interference -SF 6b
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Patient Perception of Change
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
measured by Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC)
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Serum β-endorphin
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
biomarker for pain intensity
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mediator outcome measured by PROMIS® Cancer-Anxiety - SF
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mood
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mediator outcome measured by Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Perceived support
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mediator outcome measured by PROMIS® Emotional Support - SF 6a
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mediator outcome measured by PROMIS® Self-Efficacy of Symptoms
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Salivary cortisol
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mediator outcome (biomarker for anxiety)
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Serum oxytocin
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mediator outcome (biomarker for social support)
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Lachrymal dopamine
Time Frame: through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks
Mediator outcome (biomarker for mood)
through study completion, a maximum of 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment expectancy
Time Frame: Baseline
Moderator outcome measured by Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
Baseline
Perceived Musical Competence
Time Frame: Baseline
Moderator outcome measured by two-item questionnaire
Baseline
Adult playfulness
Time Frame: Baseline
Moderator outcome measured by Short Measure for Adult Playfulness (SMAP)
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Drexel University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01NR016681 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1R01NR016681-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will make the de-identified datasets available to other researchers. Researchers will be asked to submit a formal request for data sharing to the PI that outlines the purpose of the secondary data analysis. Data and associated documentation will be made available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion of study report and publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

We will make the de-identified datasets available to other researchers. Researchers will be asked to submit a formal request for data sharing to the PI that outlines the purpose of the secondary data analysis. Data and associated documentation will be made available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings