Efficacy of a Couple-Focused mHealth Symptom Self-management Program

September 9, 2024 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Testing the Efficacy of a Couple-Focused, Tailored mHealth Intervention for Symptom Self-Management Among Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners

In this study, the investigators propose to test the efficacy of a couple-focused, web-based tailored prostate cancer symptom management program, Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) in a randomized clinical trial. A two-group (PERC versus National Cancer Institute (NCI) website plus treatment as usual) randomized controlled design will be used, and data will be collected at baseline (T1), 4 (T2), 8 (T3), and 12 months (T4) among 300 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their intimate partners (i.e., 600 participants in total).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial aims to test the efficacy of a couple-focused, web-based tailored prostate cancer symptom management program, Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC). The study participants will include 300 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their intimate partners (i.e., 300 dyads and 600 individuals). After informed consent, we will conduct baseline assessment (T1), randomly assign eligible participants to either PERC or the National Cancer Institute (NCI) website, and then collect data at 4 (T2), 8 (T3), and 12 months (T4) post-T1.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
560

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27559
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The eligible patients must

  1. be 40 to 75 years of age
  2. be within 16 weeks (4 months) after completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer as confirmed by patient and biopsy pathology report) with curative intent, i.e., surgery or radiotherapy +/- hormonal treatment;
  3. have no previous cancer history within the past 2 years and not currently in treatment for cancer, or have a concurrent cancer (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer);
  4. experience prostate cancer-specific and/or general symptoms;
  5. have a partner who is willing to participate.

The eligible partners must

  1. be 18 years or older
  2. be identified as the partner by the patient
  3. not have been diagnosed with cancer or receiving treatment for cancer within the past 12 months (non-melanomatous skin cancer diagnosis/treatment is acceptable) so that couples can focus their efforts on managing prostate cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients and their partners will be excluded from the study if they:

  • Do not read and speak English (evidenced by their understanding and responses to screening questions and self-reported ability to read English);
  • Have cognitive impairment (assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PERC Program
Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) program. Participants assigned to experimental condition will receive access to the PERC website.
Behavioral: Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC)
PERC uses mHealth technologies to dramatically increase couples' accessibility to posttreatment supportive care whenever and wherever they feel comfortable accessing it. PERC aims to improve QOL for both patients and partners by enhancing positive appraisals of illness and boosting self-efficacy, social support from multiple sources, and healthy behaviors for symptom self-management at home.
Active Comparator: usual care plus NCI website
Participants in this usual care plus NCI website group will be automatically directed to the NCI prostate cancer website after logging in to the study website homepage.
Behavioral: usual care plus NCI website
The usual care plus NCI website provides generic information about prostate cancer treatment options, research, causes, and statistics; coping resources that are not prostate cancer-specific; support from non-providers via a toll free phone and LiveHelp Online Chat about cancer-related questions, clinical trials, and quitting smoking.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8 and 12
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is used to measure change in quality of life of patient and partner from baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value. Functional assessment of Cancer Therapy-General is a 27-item survey which assesses physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "not at all" and 4 indicating "very much" in response to item questions. The total FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of four sub scores including physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Total scores range between 0-108. Higher scores indicated better well-being. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time.
Baseline, month 4, 8 and 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b is used to measure change in Pain Interference among patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8-mon post-T1), and T4 (12-mon post-T1). Required by PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The pain measures the extent to which patients experience problems with pain over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores reflect greater Pain Interference. The score value ranges between 41-78.3.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Fatigue From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
FACT-G is used to measure the change in the quality of life of patients and partners from baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-baseline values minus the Baseline value. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General is a 27-item survey that assesses physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "not at all" and 4 indicating "very much" in response to item questions. The total FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of four sub-scores including physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Total scores range between 0-108. Higher scores indicated better well-being. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Sleep Disturbance From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b is used to examine change in sleep quality of patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Required by the PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The sleep disturbance sub-scale measured the extent to which participants experienced sleep disturbance over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores reflect greater sleep disturbance. Score value ranges between 28.9-76.5.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form 7a is used to examine change in anxiety among patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). For all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The anxiety sub-scale of the PROMIS item bank measures the extent to which participants experience anxiety symptoms over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with the total scores range from 36.3 to 82.7 with higher scores reflect higher anxiety.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Depression From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression Short From 8b is used to measure the change in depression scores among patients from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Required by the PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMIS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. The depression sub-scale of the PROMIS item bank measures the extent to which participants experience depressive symptoms in the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with the total scores range from 24.7 to 63.5 with higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Urinary Symptom Score (Patient Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Urinary symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed urinary symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient urinary function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC26 was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Bowel Symptom Score (Patient Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Bowel symptom scores change by time and were measured using patients' self-assessed bowel symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Sexual Symptom Score (Patients Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Sexual symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed sexual symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Hormonal Symptom Score (Patient Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Hormonal symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed hormonal subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment. EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother. The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Urine Symptom Score (Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Urinary symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver assessed urinary symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Bowel Symptom (Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Bowel symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver-assessed bowel symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Hormonal Symptom Score Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Hormonal symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver-assessed hormonal subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Sexual Symptom Score Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Sexual symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver assessed sexual symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves. EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1). The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers. The score range is 0-100. Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Self-efficacy Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by the Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
The Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy will be used to measure change in patient and partner feelings of self-efficacy in dealing with the patient's cancer diagnosis and treatment from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value. Patients will rate statements about how confident they feel on a scale from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Informational Support Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Informational Support Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8a is a National Institute of Health-funded initiative to develop and validate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice. PROMISE is a set of measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health. It uses a 5-point Likert scale. The scoring process involved collecting PROMIS data from participants and calculating the PROMIS score as the sum of responses to each question. Then Health Measures Scoring Service was used to calculate the PROMIS T-score - the standardized score. Specifically, PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population (T-scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10). On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population; A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Instrumental Support Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Measured by PROMIS Instrumental Support-Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8a is a National Institute of Health-funded initiative to develop and validate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice. PROMISE is a set of measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health. It uses a 5-point Likert scale. The scoring process involved collecting PROMIS data from participants and calculating the PROMIS score as the sum of responses to each question. Then Health Measures Scoring Service was used to calculate the PROMIS T-score - the standardized score. Specifically, PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population (T-scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10). On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population; A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
Change in Appraisal of Illness Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Measured by Appraisal of Illness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
The appraisal of Illness scale is used to measure changes in perception of prostate cancer and related issues among patients and their partners. The Appraisal of Illness scale is a 20-item measure that uses Likert Scales ranging from 1 to 5 (very false to very true). The score range is 1-5. The higher score indicated a better cognitive appraisal of the illness the patient or partner had. The score is calculated by the Prorated mean scale scores. The formula is prorated scale score =[SUM OF ITEM SCORES]x[N OF ITEMS IN SCALE]/[N OF ITEMS ANSWERED]. Measurements were performed at baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1). Change from baseline is the post-baseline values minus the baseline value. Higher scores indicate better support.
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lixin (Lee) Song, RN, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LCCC 1713
  • 1R01NR016990-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings