B/F/TAF vs Atripla Double-Blind Switch Study in HIV-1 Infected Adults

November 21, 2022 updated by: University of Alberta

Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Switching From Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Bictegravir/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected Virologically Suppressed Adults

Atripla (ATP: FTC/TDF/EFV) was the first single pill treatment for HIV and was the most prescribed first-line treatment from approximately 2008 to 2013 for people infected with HIV. However, ATP has not been recommended as a "preferred" treatment for HIV since 2015, due to there now being single pill treatments that work better. There are a lot of people who are still taking ATP and it is working for them. However, it has the potential to cause serious side effects (chronic kidney disease and fractures and serious neurological effects). These side effects are caused by components in ATP (namely the TDF and EFV parts). Also, the efavirenz (EFV) component is not compatible for treatment of Hepatitis C (HCV) - which is often also seen in people who have HIV. For these reasons, there is a need to find a better alternative treatment for these people currently being treated with ATP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

B/F/TAF (bictegravir/FTC/TAF) is an investigational single pill drug treatment drug that contains neither TDF nor EFV. This study is looking at whether changing people to this new drug treatment will continue to suppress their HIV and have fewer side effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV-1 seropositive
  2. Age > 21 years
  3. Receiving ATP > 2 years as their only ART, with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at screening and all HIV-1 RNA tests < 100 copies/mL in the past 18 months
  4. No documented resistance mutations to the components of ATP
  5. Any CD4 count, but no active AIDS-defining opportunistic infections or cancers
  6. HBsAg+ permitted if plasma HBV DNA is unquantifiable and the patient does not have decompensated liver disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy, breastfeeding or planned pregnancy in the next 2 years
  2. Documented resistance to the components of ATP
  3. Active AIDS-defining opportunistic infection or cancer
  4. Cancer in past 3 years, except non melanoma skin cancer
  5. Active psychotic disease or active depression that may interfere with study participation according investigator discretion
  6. Any illness with a life expectancy less than 2 years
  7. eGFR < 50 mL/min
  8. Urine protein/creatinine > 40 mg/mmoL
  9. Patients who the investigator feels are unlikely to commit to the study requirements for any reason
  10. Prescription drug therapy for osteoporosis (calcium and/or vitamin D is allowed)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: B/F/TAF

B/F/TAF + Atripla Placebo

Each pill is taken once daily, (total of 2 tablets) The blinded treatment phase of this study will last for 52 weeks
Drug: B/F/TAF
B/F/TAF (Bictegravir 50mg/ Emtricitabine 200mg/ Tenofovir Alafenamide 25mg) Tablet taken orally once daily
Other Names:
  • BIKTARVY®
Drug: Atripla Placebo
Tablet taken orally once daily
Active Comparator: Atripla

Atripla + B/F/TAF Placebo

Each pill is taken once daily, (total of 2 tablets) The blinded treatment phase of this study will last for 52 weeks
Drug: Atripla
Atripla (Efavirenz 600mg/ emtricitabine 200 mg/ tenofovir disoproxil 245 mg) Tablet taken orally once daily
Drug: B/F/TAF Placebo
Tablet taken orally once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (UACR)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 48
change in urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR)
Baseline and week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV-1 RNA
Time Frame: Week 48
Number of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL
Week 48
Efavirenz (EFV) Symptom Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4
change in EFV symptom scores from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Questionnaire (PSQI) global score. PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. The PSQI global score has a possible range of 0-21. Higher scores represent worse sleep quality.
Baseline and week 4
Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (UPCR)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 48
change in urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR)
Baseline and week 48
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 48
change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
Baseline and week 48
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Hip
Time Frame: Baseline and week 48
change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip
Baseline and week 48
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Spine
Time Frame: Baseline and week 48
change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine
Baseline and week 48
CD4 Lymphocyte Counts
Time Frame: Baseline and week 48
change in CD4 lymphocyte counts
Baseline and week 48
Serum Lipids
Time Frame: Baseline and week 48
change in serum lipids
Baseline and week 48
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, and week 48
number of adverse events
Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, and week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alberta

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of British Columbia
Gilead Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen D Shafran, MD, University of Alberta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 29, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 21, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BFTAF vs Atripla

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on B/F/TAF

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings