Effect of Two Toothpastes on Bacteria in Saliva

April 30, 2019 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

In-house Study to Determine the Effect of Two Zinc-containing Toothpaste Formulations on Viability of Bacteria in Saliva

This study investigated the ability of two zinc-containing toothpaste formulations (Zinc A and Zinc B) to reduce the level of bacteria in saliva in the two-hour period after their use, compared to the effect of rinsing with water alone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a single centre, three treatment, randomized, blinded, cross-over study which involved rinsing with slurries of two sodium fluoride-silica dentifrices containing zinc chloride and sodium citrate, and with water alone. The study consisted of four Visits: Visit 1 (Screening), Visit 2 (Treatment 1), Visit 3 (Treatment 2), Visit 4 (Treatment 3). There was a minimum two days wash out period before the first treatment visit and between treatment visits to avoid any treatment carry-over effect. During that time participants brushed as normal (twice-daily) at home with a washout toothpaste and a toothbrush which was provided at screening. Participants were required not to brush their teeth on the morning of the treatment visits and not to eat or drink for 2 hours prior to the treatment visits.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Weybridge, United Kingdom, KT13 0DE
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Personnel: GSKCH permanent and contract/contingency workers.
  • Consent: Demonstrated understanding of the study and was willing to participate and had received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
  • Compliance: Understood, was willing and able and complied with all study procedures and restrictions.
  • General Health: Good general health
  • Oral Health: Good oral health
  • Salivary Flow Rate: Had a salivary flow rate in the range of normal values (unstimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.2milliliter per minute (ml/min); stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.8ml/min)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study personnel: Members of the clinical study staff.
  • Pregnancy: Pregnant Women
  • Breast-feeding: Women who were breast-feeding.
  • Allergy/Intolerance: Had Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • Medication: a) Used an antimicrobial mouthwash within 48 hours of the test visit e.g. Listerine, Corsodyl etc. b) had taken, antibiotics within 2 weeks of the test visit.
  • Oral Surgery and Dental Conditions: a)Had an on-going dental treatment b) Had any oral surgery or extraction within 6 weeks of screening c) Symptoms of oral pain or any self-reported oral ulcers or herpetic lesions
  • Clinical Study Participation: a) Participation in a clinical study where they received an investigational drug within 2 weeks of the screening visit b) Previously participated in this study.
  • Substance Abstinence: Participant who were unwilling to abstain from smoking for at least 2 hours prior to treatment visits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Zinc-A toothpaste
In this arm, participants received Zinc-A toothpaste (test product 1) in the form of slurry.
Drug: Zinc-A toothpaste
Participants received 6.0 grams (g) [± 0.3g] of the Zinc-A toothpaste in the form of slurry, one day per treatment (with at least 2 [generally 7] days between treatments. Participants emptied the contents of the dosing cup into their mouth, swilled the product around their mouth for 2 timed minutes then they expectorated into a sink.
EXPERIMENTAL: Zinc-B toothpaste
In this arm, participants received Zinc-B toothpaste (test product 2) in the form of slurry.
Drug: Zinc-B toothpaste
Participants received 6.0 grams (g) [± 0.3g] of the Zinc-B toothpaste in the form of slurry, one day per treatment (with at least 2 [generally 7] days between treatments. Participants emptied the contents of the dosing cup into their mouth, swilled the product around their mouth for 2 timed minutes then they expectorated into a sink.
OTHER: Mineral Water
In this arm, participants received mineral water.
Other: Mineral water
Participants received 6.0g (±0.3g) of mineral water (by weighing out), one day per treatment (with at least 2 [generally 7] days between treatments). Participants emptied the contents of the dosing cup into their mouth, swilled the product around their mouth for 2 timed minutes then they expectorated into a sink.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve Between 0 and 2 Hours (AUC [0-2] Hours) for Total Viable Counts (TVCs) of Bacteria in Saliva Using Traditional Plating Technique
Time Frame: Change from baseline in log10-transformed AUC 0-2hr
Area Under the Curve (AUC) between 0 and 2 hours (hr) was assessed using traditional plating technique which provides the total viable counts (TVCs) of anaerobic bacteria. This outcome measure is AUC of change from baseline in log TVC. AUC for each time-point were calculated individually for each participant for each treatment and were aggregated into an AUC measurement. The aggregated AUC measurement was calculated in the order that first the collected data is logged which is further analyzed by change in log. Then, AUC 0-2hr change in log was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The resulted values were then divided by 2hr to take out time units and are logged to calculate bacteria count. Hence, the outcome measure calculates change from baseline in log10-transformed AUC 0-2hr over the range from pre-treatment time point (0hr) to the concentration at 120 minutes (min) i.e., 2hr.
Change from baseline in log10-transformed AUC 0-2hr

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in AUC (0-2) Hours for the Ratio of Live:Dead Bacteria Using Live-dead Staining Technique
Time Frame: Baseline up to 2 hours
Anaerobic bacteria were counted using live:dead staining technique. Change from baseline in AUC (0-2)hr was calculated for the ratio of live and dead bacteria. Viable bacterial counts for each time-point were calculated individually for each participant for each treatment and were aggregated into an AUC measurement. AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule and using nominal time points. The resulted values were then divided by 2hr to take out time units. The AUC was calculated over the range from pre-treatment time point (0hr) to 2hr. In this outcome measure, the change from baseline is calculated in log ratio of live: dead.
Baseline up to 2 hours
Change From Baseline in log10-transformed Total Viable Bacterial Count Using Traditional Bacterial Plating Technique
Time Frame: At Baseline, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment
Anaerobic bacteria were counted using traditional plating technique. Total viable bacterial counts for each time-point was calculated individually for each participant for each treatment. Change from baseline in log 10 transformed total viable bacterial values was calculated.
At Baseline, 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment
Change From Baseline in Live:Dead Bacteria Ratio in Saliva Using Staining Technique
Time Frame: At Baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment
Anaerobic bacteria were counted using live:dead staining technique. Change from baseline was calculated for the ratio of live to dead bacteria.
At Baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 4, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 27, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 27, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 202287

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings