Application of UCPCR as a Testing Tool for Identification of MODY Patients in the UAE

August 18, 2020 updated by: Imperial College London Diabetes Centre
The study aims to investigate the validity of 2 hour post-prandial UCPCR test in paediatric and adult patients with diabetes duration greater than 2 and 5 years, respectively, for the purposes of distinguishing between patients with type 1 diabetes and MODY in the UAE population.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) is a non invasive measure of endogenous insulin secretion and has been shown to be effective in identifying Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) from Type 1 Diabetes in adults and paediatric population. Here in the UAE, diabetes prevalence is at 18.9% of the general population and patients are medically treated according to their diabetes type. Currently identification of patients with MODY poses multiple challenges and in some instances results in wrongful diagnosis and treatment of the patients. Most commonly, patients are treated as having type 1 diabetes and given unnecessary insulin injections.

Making correct diabetes diagnosis is pivotal for appropriate disease management. Currently, a set of criteria including age of onset of diabetes (<30 years), BMI<25kg/m2 and absence of islet-cell and GAD auto-antibodies are applied in order to identify potential Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) patients. This has to be followed by genetic testing before final diagnosis is made. Although the set criteria increase the probability of identifying MODY patients, fully discriminating between MODY and type 1 diabetes can still be difficult. As such, some MODY patients (e.g. with mutations in HNF1A or HNF4A genes) are wrongfully treated with insulin when sulphonylureas would be efficient enough for management of their diabetes.

This study will consists of three groups; patients who are autoantibody negative (divided into patients with potential MODY and patients with type 2 diabetes), patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and patients who do not have diabetes at the time of recruitment (selected randomly and will include patients with other diagnoses such as IFG and/or IGT). All groups will consist of paediatric patients (≤18 years of age) and adult patients (age of onset of diabetes ≤ 30 years).

The scientific aims of the study are:

  • Validating UCPCR as an in-house test that can potentially be used for clinical purposes.
  • Measuring UCPCR in the study cohort and testing if a cutoff of 0.7nmol/mmol in children and 0.2nmol/mmol in adults will apply to population of interest (ie UAE population).
  • Using operating characteristic curves to identify the optimal UCPCR cut-off for discriminating diabetes subtypes in.
  • Confirming the UCPCR results through genetic analysis of the samples.
  • Validating positive genetic test results by performing mutational analysis on the parents of the patient.
  • Potentially identifying novel MODY mutations in the study population.
  • conducting UCPCR measurements for patients who have been clinically and genetically diagnosed with MODY. This will assist the investigators in confirming the cutoff values for MODY diagnosis.
  • Successfully estimating the background prevalence of MODY in diabetes patients in the Emirates of Abu Dhabi.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
778

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Arab Emirates
      • Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 48338
        • Imperial College London Diabetes Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients attending Imperial College London Diabetes Centre, UAE.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with age and age of diabetes onset of <18 years
  • patients with age of ≥18 years and age of diabetes onset of ≤30 years

Exclusion Criteria:

- patients with age of ≥18 years and age of diabetes onset of >30 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Autoantibody Negative

Patients who are autoantibody negative (could potentially be either MODY or type 2 diabetes patients)

Suspected MODY patients will be candidates for next generation sequencing (NGS)
Genetic: Next generation sequencing (NGS)
Patients will be tested for known MODY genes with specific focus on HNF1A, GCK and HNF4A genes. Furthermore, gene panel testing may be performed for any known diabetes genes.If the results are negative, WES/WGS will be performed in patients suspected of having MODY for identification of novel MODY mutations.
Other Names:
  • NGS panel
  • Whole exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Patients with positive UCPCR and negative autoantibodies results will be suspected with MODY and will be candidates for next generation sequencing (NGS)
Genetic: Next generation sequencing (NGS)
Patients will be tested for known MODY genes with specific focus on HNF1A, GCK and HNF4A genes. Furthermore, gene panel testing may be performed for any known diabetes genes.If the results are negative, WES/WGS will be performed in patients suspected of having MODY for identification of novel MODY mutations.
Other Names:
  • NGS panel
  • Whole exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS)
Non Diabetic
Individuals not diagnosed with any type of diabetes (but could be diagnosed with IFG and/or IGT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary C-peptide Creatinine Ratio (UCPCR)
Time Frame: 2 hours post-prandial
Measuring UCPCR in our study cohort and testing if a cutoff of 0.7nmol/mmol in children and 0.2nmol/mmol in adults will apply to our population of interest (ie UAE population).
2 hours post-prandial

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to identify the optimal UCPCR cut-off for discriminating diabetes subtypes in our study population.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Genetic analysis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
Confirming our UCPCR results through genetic analysis of the samples.
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Positive genetic result analysis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
Validating positive genetic test results by performing mutational analysis on the parents of the patient.
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Novel MODY genes and mutations
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
Identifying novel MODY genes and/or mutations in the study population through next generation sequencing methodologies
through study completion, an average of 2 year
UCPCR measurements
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
Conducting UCPCR measurements for patients who have been clinically and genetically diagnosed with MODY. This will assist us in confirming the cutoff values for MODY diagnosis.
through study completion, an average of 2 year
Prevalence of MODY
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
Estimating the background prevalence of MODY in diabetes patients in the Emirates of Abu Dhabi.
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Imperial College London Diabetes Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 18, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IREC018

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Next generation sequencing (NGS)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings