Feasibility and Outcomes of a Digital Health Support for the Schizophrenia Spectrum

May 22, 2020 updated by: Sean Kidd, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Testing the Feasibility and Outcomes of a Digital Health Support for Individuals With Schizophrenia Spectrum Mental Illnesses

This protocol describes an attempt to capture the development phase of a mobile support for individuals with schizophrenia. The intent is to describe and account for a rigorous development process that will result in the creation of a beta version that would be tested in a randomized trial for effectiveness - to be addressed in a subsequent protocol

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

General Issues The most common contributors to relapse in schizophrenia and associated mental illnesses are medication non-adherence, social isolation, and inadequate supports. Driven to a large extent by system of care shortcomings and the many challenges presented by symptoms, the impacts of these problems are profound from individual to system levels. This is a global issue, and to date technology has not been substantively leveraged in generating solutions - despite evidence of substantial uptake of relevant technologies by relevant populations. To date, there are few products on the market that address the constellation of issues outlined above. It is an area where a nuanced approach is needed as this illness is highly diverse in presentation, attended by a number of social determinants of health that greatly affect outcomes and, quite commonly, ambivalence with respect to service provider and caregiver engagement. This scenario as it exists for schizophrenia stands in sharp contrast with the many thousands of applications developed for other mental health issues.

Cellphone Based Technologies and Schizophrenia There is a small, emergent literature that is examining the feasibility and outcomes of mobile applications that address schizophrenia. Broadly, targeted mobile and online applications in areas such as cognitive remediation (brain training games) have been found feasible and do not result in any noted risks in their use and there have been promising findings in outcome studies of emergent mHealth strategies for schizophrenia of the kind tested here.

Local Work in this Area to Date

Initial mapping of key domains relevant to an app in this area has been conducted based upon the experience of the collaborators and an understanding of the relevant practice literatures. This initial draft, which might be considered a 'paper prototype', let to the identification of the following needs:

The platform would:

  • Help prevent social isolation through personalized prompts, scheduling of activities, and connections to a range of resources relevant to social engagement
  • Enhance hopeful and informed engagement in the recovery process through functions that foster resilience and draw upon evidence based strategies to enhance wellness (e.g., personalized affirmations; tip sheets; relaxation exercises)
  • Facilitate automated support and link to caregivers
  • Encourage and check-in on daily essential activities for patients - addressing memory, attention, and initiation challenges that often occur as a part of this illness
  • Provide basic health/safety functionality and track level of wellness

Specifically, the app was designed to be made up of 4 functional areas:

  1. A needs assessment in order to determine care/interaction pathway, crisis planning and routine builders, accompanied by ongoing assessment to keep components relevant and engaging and to facilitate treatment planning and support by providers.
  2. Daily interactions and check-in functionality for self-determination of messaging, reward messaging, social interaction content.
  3. An algorithm to determine content based on ambient and interaction data content triggers and risk flagging built on evidence-based guidelines.
  4. Self-Management portal and caregiver dashboard.

Research Objective

This study was undertaken to engage in a rigorous process of feasibility testing. This will then be followed by a randomized trial of the beta version that will be generated through the process outlined in this protocol (will be the subject of a subsequent protocol and not addressed here). As such, the objective of this research is to capture and record the process of development of a functional, beta version of this technology. This test includes outcome data derived from 1 month of app use comprised of both qualitative feedback and quantitative outcome data. The objective is to determine feasibility prior to further trials and validation efforts.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1R8
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are 18 years of age or older
  • Have a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis
  • Own and regularly use a smart phone equipped with an Android operating system and a talk and data plan
  • Read and speak conversational English

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Use of mHealth Technology
This single arm of the study involves the provision of the mobile health technology entitled App4Independence.
Combination product: App4Independence

The mobile, app-based platform was designed to:

  • Help prevent social isolation through personalized prompts, scheduling of activities, and connections to a range of resources relevant to social engagement
  • Enhance hopeful and informed engagement in the recovery process through functions that foster resilience and draw on evidence based strategies to enhance wellness (e.g., personalized affirmations; tip sheets; relaxation exercises)
  • Encourage and check-in on daily essential activities for patients - addressing memory, attention, and initiation challenges that often occur as a part of this illness
  • Provide basic health/safety functionality and track level of wellness
  • Provide an anonymous peer-peer online network for strategy sharing
  • Provide an ambient sound detector to assist with identifying hallucinations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptomatology
Time Frame: 1 Month
The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) assesses the level of psychiatric symptomatology providing both total and subscale scores. All 53 items are 5-point likert with higher scores meaning higher symptomatology. For the overall score the total is used and can range from 0-212. Total scores from each of the 9 subscales are similarly used with higher scores meaning greater subscale symptomatology. Lowest scores for all are 0, with 20 the highest score for hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, psychoticism; 16 the highest score for interpersonal sensitivity; 24 the highest for obsessive compulsive, depression, anxiety; and 28 for somatization.
1 Month
Recovery Process Engagement
Time Frame: 1 month
Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (PROM) was used to assess degree of engagement in the recovery process. The prom has 30 items, all 5 point likert with higher scores meaning more recovery engagement. The metric is the total score (0-120)/4 to provide an adjusted score. There are no subscales.
1 month
Treatment Adherence
Time Frame: 1 month
Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) was used to examine implications of A4i for medication use. A total score ranging from 0-100 is provided with 100 indicating better adherence.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sean Kidd, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 8, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 84-2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available via a supplementary file in the publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Available upon publication indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Publically accessible.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings