Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy First vs. Standard Algorithm in Patients With Melena (FIRM)

September 27, 2020 updated by: Zhuan Liao, Changhai Hospital

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy First vs. Standard Algorithm in Patients With Melena (FIRM Trial): a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

MCE first algorithm is not inferior to standard of care algorithm in terms of further bleeding in hemodynamically stable patients with acute overt and non-hematochezia GI bleeding.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Presenting to the outpatient department or emergency department with melena (without hematemesis) within the previous 48 hours
  • Hemodynamically stable (blood pressure > 100/60 mmHg and heart rate < 100 bpm) at presentation
  • No endoscopy performed after the new onset of melena

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting with hematochezia and/or hematemesis within the previous 48 hours of presentation
  • Hemodynamically stable after initial volume resuscitation
  • Drop of hemoglobin level ≥ 2 g/dL/day, and/or need of transfusion ≥ 2 units of packed red blood cells per day
  • Contraindications of CE (e.g. dysphagia, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal stricture, known or suspected gastric or small bowel obstruction or perforation, gastroparesis, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or abdominal surgery altering gastrointestinal anatomy, or post-abdominal radiation, etc.)
  • Presence of internal cardiac defibrillator (ICD), pacemaker and/or other implanted electronic devices (cochlea, drug infusion pump, nerve stimulator, etc.) or magnetic metal foreign bodies; possibility of requiring an MRI examination prior to capsule excretion
  • Patients who cannot undergo surgery in the event of capsule retention
  • Pregnant and/or lactating women
  • Patients with altered mental status (such as hepatic encephalopathy)
  • Patients moribund from terminal malignant diseases or other end-stage illnesses with a limited life expectancy
  • Unable to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: MCE first group
Patients randomized to the "MCE first group" will have a MCE deployed as the first detection method.
Diagnostic test: MCE first
Patients randomized to the "MCE first group" will have a MCE deployed as soon as possible once confirmed to fast for at least 8 hours.
NO_INTERVENTION: standard of care group
For patients randomized to the Standard Care Group, gastroenterologists choose which procedures to perform and when to perform them based on their interpretation of the patient's presentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of bleeding lesions detection.
Time Frame: 1 month
Detection rate of bleeding lesions is defined as proportion of patients in whom a potential bleeding lesion is identified. Visualization of gross blood (fresh/coffee grounds) without any lesion will not be considered as a positive diagnosis. The panel will provide a diagnosis based upon the lesion presenting the highest potential for bleeding if there are many lesions detected.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The time of the bleeding lesions detected from admission
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
The number of procedures patients underwent for detection of the bleeding lesions
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
The number of colonoscopy needed
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Rate of therapeutic intervention required of all patients
Time Frame: 1 month
Therapeutic interventions include therapeutic endoscopy, radiologic intervention or surgery.
1 month
The length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
The cumulative direct cost of hospitalization
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Time to therapeutic intervention from presentation
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
The rate of recurrent bleeding within 30 days of discharge
Time Frame: 1 month
Further bleeding is defined as overt (hematemesis, melena or hematochezia) or occult (anemia or fecal occult blood positive) bleeding requiring subsequent hospitalization or transfusion, and/or signs of hypovolemic shock (systolic blood pressure of <100 mmHg and pulse rate >100 per min) or a drop-in hemoglobin level of >2g/dL per 24hours.
1 month
The all-cause mortality within 30 days of discharge
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Transfusion rate
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Changhai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MCE-melena-2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings