Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes in Chronic HBV Infection Patients With Low HBsAg Under Unplanned Intervention

July 20, 2019 updated by: Yao Xie, Beijing Ditan Hospital

Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes in Chronic HBV Infection Patients With Low HBsAg Loads Under Unplanned Intervention

All chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were diagnosed and treated in the liver disease department of the Hepatology Center of Beijing Ditan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University and those who received antiviral therapy (interferon and nucleoside analogues) reached HBsAg<100 IU/ml. The enrolled subjects were divided into the following six observation cohorts: 1) CHB patients in the immunological control period, without any clinical treatment intervention; 2) After interferon therapy, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, continued interferon therapy; 3) After interferon therapy, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, stopped interferon treatment; 4) After interferon therapy, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, sequential nucleoside analog treatment; 5) After nucleoside analogue treatment, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, sequential interferon treatment; 6) After treated with nucleoside analogues, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, continuing the nucleoside analog treatment. The follow-up observation period was 96 weeks under non-planned intervention. During the observation period, HBV indicators and biochemical indicators, serum AFP and liver imaging (liver ultrasound) were examined regularly. The main evaluation index was the incidence of HBsAg disappearance during the observation period. Secondary evaluation indicators: the rate of HBV DNA turning positive, the rate of HBeAg turning positive and hepatitis incidence. To observe the inactive carrier status of low HBsAg content and the incidence of HBsAg disappearance, clinical outcomes and influencing factors in patients with CHB under different antiviral interventions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a clinical observational cohort study. All chronic hepatitis B patients were diagnosed and treated in the liver disease department of the Hepatology Center of Beijing Ditan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University and those who received antiviral therapy (interferon and nucleoside analogues) reached HBsAg<100 IU/ml. The enrolled subjects were divided into the following six observation cohorts: 1) chronic Hepatitis B patients in the immunological control period, without any clinical treatment intervention in this cohort; 2) After interferon therapy, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, continued interferon therapy in this cohort; 3) After interferon therapy, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, stopped interferon treatment in this cohort; 4) After interferon therapy, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, sequential nucleoside analog treatment in this cohort; 5) After nucleoside analogue treatment, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, sequential interferon treatment in this cohort; 6) After treated with nucleoside analogues, HBsAg<100 IU/ml, continuing the nucleoside analog treatment in this cohort. The follow-up observation period was 96 weeks under non-planned intervention. During the observation period, HBV DNA loads, HBsAg/anti-HBs, HBeAg/anti-HBe and biochemical indicators, serum AFP and liver imaging (liver ultrasound) were examined regularly. The main evaluation index was the incidence of HBsAg disappearance during the observation period. Secondary evaluation indicators: the rate of HBV DNA turning positive, the rate of HBeAg turning positive and hepatitis incidence. To observe the inactive carrier status of low HBsAg content and the incidence of HBsAg disappearance, clinical outcomes and influencing factors in patients with CHB under different antiviral interventions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
420

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100015
        • Recruiting
        • liver disease center, Beijing Ditan Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg < 100 IU/ml in an inactive carrying state were enrolled and treated with antiviral therapy (interferon and nucleoside analogs). All patients with chronic hepatitis B infection were eligible for the diagnostic criteria of the Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (2015).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inactive carrier status and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with anti-viral therapy (interferon and nucleoside analogues) reaching HBsAg < 100 IU/ml.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • coinfection with other viruses including HCV, HDV, and HIV;
  • syphilis antibody positive;
  • co-exist other liver diseases including alcoholic liver disease, metabolic liver disease, fatty liver, drug induce liver injury, and autoimmune liver disease;
  • complication of cirrhosis or liver cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
chronic hepatitis B patients during the immune control period
Patients with chronic HBV infection during the immune control period do not have any clinical treatment intervention cohort
Therapy group A
After chronic hepatitis B patients were treated with interferon, HBsAg level of these patients < 100 IU / ml, and they continued to be treated with interferon
Drug: Interferon
chronic hepatitis B patients with interferon therapy
Therapy group B
After chronic hepatitis B patients were treated with interferon, HBsAg level of these patients < 100 IU / ml, and they stopped to be treated with interferon
Drug: Interferon
chronic hepatitis B patients with interferon therapy
Therapy group C
After chronic hepatitis B patients were treated with interferon, HBsAg level of these patients < 100 IU / ml, and they continued to be treated with sequential nucleoside analogues
Drug: Interferon
chronic hepatitis B patients with interferon therapy
Drug: nucleoside analogues
chronic hepatitis B patients with interferon therapy
Therapy group D
After chronic hepatitis B patients were treated with nucleoside analogues, HBsAg level of these patients < 100 IU / ml, and they continued to be treated with sequential interferon
Drug: Interferon
chronic hepatitis B patients with interferon therapy
Drug: nucleoside analogues
chronic hepatitis B patients with interferon therapy
Therapy group E
After chronic hepatitis B patients were treated with nucleoside analogues, HBsAg level of these patients < 100 IU / ml, and they continued to be treated with the nucleoside analogues
Drug: nucleoside analogues
chronic hepatitis B patients with interferon therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of HBsAg disappearance during the 96-week study in different observation cohorts
Time Frame: 96 weeks
The incidence of HBsAg disappearance during the 96-week study in different observation cohorts
96 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV DNA re-yang rate during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts
Time Frame: 96 weeks
HBV DNA re-yang rate and HBeAg re-yang rate during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts
96 weeks
HBeAg re-yang rate during the 96-week study
Time Frame: 96 weeks
HBeAg re-yang rate during the 96-week study
96 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
liver cancer during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
Time Frame: 96 weeks
liver cancer during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
96 weeks
Hepatitis episodes during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
Time Frame: 96 weeks
Hepatitis episodes during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
96 weeks
cirrhosis decompensation during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
Time Frame: 96 weeks
cirrhosis decompensation during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
96 weeks
its complications during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
Time Frame: 96 weeks
its complications during the 96-week study period in different observation cohorts Incidence
96 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Ditan Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yao Xie, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Beijing, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 20, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DTXY017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings