Low-voltage Areas Defragmentation in Sinus Rhythm for Radiofrequency Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (SCAR-AF)

September 11, 2023 updated by: French Cardiology Society
This is a study evaluating the value of defragmentation of sinus rhythmic low voltage areas in addition to isolation of pulmonary veins in the removal of recurrent atrial fibrillation. The invasive procedure will be performed according to the procedures chosen by the rhythmologist and will in no way be modified by the patient's enrollment in the study. Similarly, the frequency of consultations, date and nature of the additional examinations will be defined by the physician, with the purpose of monitoring the patient.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Radiofrequency ablation has become standard practice in the approach strategy for the symptomatic treatment of atrial fibrillation. The interest of substrate ablation, completing the isolation of the pulmonary veins is controversial. The usual technique for the ablation of recurrent atrial fibrillation is primarily a disconnection of the pulmonary veins, which can be accomplished by isolating the veins one by one or two by two. The isolation of the pulmonary veins is followed most often by a defragmentation of the atrium (ablation of the substrate). The defragmentation is guided by a map of fragmented potentials, made through a topography catheter, to locate the most abnormal areas that are the target of ablation. This strategy requires extensive ablation of the left atrium, with a long procedure time and repeated many radiofrequency shots. On the one hand there is a risk of complication related to the duration of intervention, but also in the longer term of occurrence of flutter scar. In addition to pulmonary vein isolation, the goal is to identify patients with sinus rhythm atrial arrhythmogenic substrate. Once the sinus rhythm has been restored by electrical cardioversion or spontaneously, a voltage map is carried out to identify the most abnormal (low voltage) areas, and intra-atrial fragmented potentials are identified, either spontaneously or spontaneously by the extra-stimulus method. Ablation of these abnormal areas may lead to better long-term results, limiting prolonged radiofrequency shots and complications associated with longer procedure times.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
212

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Angers, France, 49100
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire D'Angers
      • Caluire-et-Cuire, France, 69300
        • Clinique de l'Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon
      • Lyon, France, 69007
        • Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc
      • Marseille, France, 13008
        • Hôpital Saint-Joseph
      • Marseille, France, 13012
        • Hôpital privé Beauregard
      • Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 92200
        • Clinique Ambroise Pare
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière
      • Saint-Denis, France, 93200
        • Centre Cardiologique du Nord
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • Clinique Saint Gatien

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients included in this protocol will be recruited by the centers that practice the procedure of ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation, by transcutaneous vein and trans-septal catheterization. Participation in this prospective observational study has been proposed to all centers practicing this procedure in France, regardless of the technique used. Inclusion in the study will be systematically offered to each patient who will benefit from this technique.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, no specific indication restrictions or equipment used and regardless of the outcome of the procedure
  • Patients participating in a biomedical research can participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women can not participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group 1
A group of patients who have pulmonary vein isolation alone, without low-voltage areas identified.
Procedure: Isolation of pulmonary veins
Low voltage areas are identified and treated by radiofrequency. Atrial fibrillation is treated by heat produced by an electric current: radio frequency. This is an intervention that consists of blocking abnormal electrical activity, especially in the pulmonary veins.
Group 2
A group of patients who have pulmonary veins isolation alone, with low-voltage areas identified but the complementary defragmentation will not be carried out.
Procedure: Isolation of pulmonary veins
Low voltage areas are identified and treated by radiofrequency. Atrial fibrillation is treated by heat produced by an electric current: radio frequency. This is an intervention that consists of blocking abnormal electrical activity, especially in the pulmonary veins.
Group 3
A group of patients who have pulmonary veins isolation, with low-voltage areas identified and the complementary defragmentation will be carried out.
Procedure: Isolation of pulmonary veins
Low voltage areas are identified and treated by radiofrequency. Atrial fibrillation is treated by heat produced by an electric current: radio frequency. This is an intervention that consists of blocking abnormal electrical activity, especially in the pulmonary veins.
Procedure: Ablation by radiofrequency of low-voltage areas
The defragmentation is guided by a map of fragmented potentials, made through a topography catheter, to locate the most abnormal areas that are the target of ablation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the success rate of the procedures
Time Frame: month 18
Comparison between the 3 study arms of the number of new episodes of symptomatic atrial fibrillation
month 18

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the efficiency of the procedures
Time Frame: Day 1
Comparison between the 3 study arms of the duration of the intervention (in minutes), the duration of fluoroscopy (in minutes), rate of X-ray doses delivered during the procedure (in mGym² (milligray per meter²), the induction of atrial fibrillation at the end of the procedure or not.
Day 1
Evaluation of the safety of the procedures
Time Frame: Day 1 / month 3 / month 6 / month 12 / month 18
Comparison between the 3 study arms of the number and type of events regarding the types of procedure: pericardial effusion, pericardial drainage, vascular complication, ischemic stroke, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, new atrial fibrillation episode, death.
Day 1 / month 3 / month 6 / month 12 / month 18

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
French Cardiology Society

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antoine LEPILLIER, MD, Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings