The Effect of the Low Fodmap Diet in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
The Effect of the Low Fodmap Diet on Gastrointestinal and Behavioral Problems in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- The Ohio State University Nisonger Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 6-17 age range
- Diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder
- Parent/Caregiver report of constipation and /or abdominal pain. • ROME IV criteria was utilized to identify constipation (defined as the presence of two of more of the following symptoms: Two or fewer stools per week, at least 1 episode of fecal incontinence per week, history of retentive posturing or excessive volitional stool retention, history of painful or hard bowel movements, presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum, history of large diameter stools that can obstruct the toilet) • ROME IV criteria was utilized to identify abdominal pain (defined as the fulfilled at least 4 times per month and include all of the following: episodic or continuous abdominal pain that does not occur solely during physiologic events (eg, eating, menses), insufficient criteria for irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, or abdominal migraine, the abdominal pain cannot be fully explained by another medical condition)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 6 and over 17 years old
- Having a specific restrictive diet to treat allergies or a specific chronic disease - Any history of abdominal surgeries
- Any history of chronic physiological GI disorders such as celiac, inflammatory bowel disease, eosinophilic esophagitis.
- Any chronic condition that may impact GI function such as thyroid disease, cystic fibrosis, or cardiac abnormalities
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low FODMAP Diet Group
The parent/caregiver was given detailed nutrition education by the investigator concerning the low FODMAP diet and was asked to implement for 2 weeks.
|
The low FODMAP diet group reduced the intake of FODMAP(fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols)
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group (Habitual Diet)
The parent/caregiver was asked to continue their child's usual dietary intake for 2 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Gastrointestinal Module-Parent Report
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Before the study period and at the end of the two weeks, the effect of the low FODMAP diet on the severity of GI disorders was assessed with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Gastrointestinal Module-Parent Report.
A 74-item survey with 14 scales items: stomach pain and hurt (6 items), discomfort when eating (5), food and drink limits (6), trouble swallowing (3), heartburn/reflux (4), nausea/vomiting (4), gas and bloating (7), constipation (14), blood in poop (2), diarrhea (7), worry about going poop (5), worry about stomachaches (2), medicines (4), and communication (5).
Total Score: Sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales.
Items are reverse-scored and transformed to a 0-100 scale so lower scores reflect worse GI dysfunction (As follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0).
Response choices are in Likert-scale format ranging from 0 to 4 (0=Never, 1=Almost Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=Almost Always).
|
2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of stool consistency
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Consistency of the stool were recorded for 3 days before the study period and the last three days of the study using the Bristol stool scale.
According to Bristol stool scale human stool is categorized into seven groups.
Types 1 and 2 are defined as indications of constipation, Types 6 and 7 are indications of diarrhea, and Types 3, 4, and 5 show normal stool consistency.
Daily stool consistency score was recorded.
This was averaged and compared to the baseline and two weeks.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Assessment of stool frequency
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Frequency of the stool were recorded for 3 days before the study period and the last three days of the study.
Daily number of stools were recorded.
This was averaged and compared to the baseline and two weeks.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Assessment of behavioral problems
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Behavioral problems were determined before the study period and end of the study (after two weeks) using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C).
ABC-C checklist have 5 domains: 1) Irritability (includes agitation, aggression and self-injurious behaviors, 15 items); 2) Social Withdrawal (16 items); 3) Stereotypies (7 items); 4) Hyperactivity (16 items); and 5)Inappropriate Speech (4 items).The ABC-C is a 58-item questionnaire for caregivers/parent/caregivers and each item is scored as 0 (never a problem), 1 (slight problem), 2 (moderately serious problem), 3 (severe problem).
it is not computed a total score based on the summation of all 58 items, as the subscales are largely independents.
Higher scores indicate a higher severity of behavioral problems.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Energy and Nutrient Intake
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The parent/caregiver recorded food consumption of children for three days before the study period and the last three days of the study.The data for the three day dietary record were entered into a computerized database.
Energy, macronutrients and micronutrients were calculated using The Food Processor SQL - ESHA Research.
2006
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marcia Nahikian-Nelms, PhD, Ohio State University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018H0543
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.