Temperature Gradients for Sepsis Severity and Fluid Resuscitation (sepsis)

August 25, 2019 updated by: Zhongqing Chen, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

A Prospective, Single-center Study of Temperature Gradients for Sepsis Severity and Fluid Resuscitation

The assessment and treatment of Septic Shock (SS) is a thorny issue in current care. Fluid resuscitation is one of the key measures for SS treatment. Current fluid resuscitation is dominated by empirical treatment or early target-directed therapy. The former has a clear goal of recovery, and the latter is complicated to implement and has many complications. It is known that patients with SS due to insufficient tissue perfusion, the distribution of blood flow in the peripheral center to the center, may lead to an increase in the central-peripheral-room temperature difference, suggesting that this index has potential value for direction of fluid resuscitation. This study intends to measure the severity of SS and efficacy of fluid resuscitation by measuring the "central-peripheral-room temperature" gradient of patients as well as comparing temperature gradient with hemodynamic indexes (PICCO) and indexes of ultrasound capacity assessment, providing more convenient indicators for sepsis and fluid resuscitation assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Sepsis remains a great challenge for clinicians. Early and timely fluid resuscitation is the basic measure for the treatment of sepsis. It is important to quickly diagnose the severity of sepsis and evaluate the effects of fluid resuscitation. Existing monitoring methods such as blood pressure, urine volume, blood lactate, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume variability (SVV), etc. have certain limitations or invasive disadvantages. Clinically, effective and convenient non-invasive means are needed for monitoring. Present research revealed that microcirculatory dysfunction and tissue hypoperfusion have a very important role in the pathophysiological mechanism of sepsis, and will be associated with severe organ dysfunction, which is closely related to serious adverse prognosis. Importantly, tissue hypoperfusion can cause central and peripheral body temperature changes. Studies have shown that clinical assessment of peripheral skin temperature can identify potential severe organ dysfunction in patients with stable hemodynamics. The latest study found that patients with septic shock have greater central-peripheral body temperature differences than sepsis patients, and the temperature difference between peripheral-room temperature is smaller. That is, the central-peripheral-room temperature gradient changes show a reduction of tissue perfusion, suggesting microcirculatory disorders and organ dysfunction. In addition, the body temperature gradient is simple and non-invasive, and is a bedside indicator that predicts tissue perfusion.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
205

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Recruiting
        • Nanfang Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study subjects were patients with sepsis and/or septic shock in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Southern Hospital from September 2019 to September 2022.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 17 years old.
  • Patients with sepsis or septic shock who meet the diagnostic criteria for sepsis 3.0 and who are routinely treated according to 《Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016》.
  • Get informed consent within 2 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years old.
  • A confirmed pregnancy or urine pregnancy test is positive.
  • Patients with septic shock at low temperature (central body temperature <35 °C).
  • The informed consent of the legal representative of the subject was not obtained.
  • Known liver disease affecting peripheral perfusion assessment, such as vascular occlusive vasculitis, multiple arteritis, and Raynaud's disease.
  • Any disease that restricts the use of fluid resuscitation, such as: heart failure, major cardiac surgery, post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, severe heart disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day mortality
Time Frame: three years
Rate of all-caused mortality at 28 days
three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU Length of stay
Time Frame: three years
Days of participants stay in the intensive care unit (ICU)
three years
Hospital Length of stay
Time Frame: three years
Days of participants stay in hospital
three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018cr047
  • 320.6750.18431 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Wu Jieping Fund)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings