Evaluation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Right Operculum 3 (OP3) in Permanent Non-pulsatile Disabling Tinnitus (TINNOP3-DBS) (TINNOP3-DBS)

December 10, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
This pilot study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment of unilateral or bilateral, non-pulsatile, disabling, tinnitus, without vestibular dysfunction, using Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the parieto-insular right operculum 3 (OP3) in a cross-over, double study design.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjective, non-pulsatile, permanent, severe, tinnitus, refractory to all treatment are very disabling. They can lead to serious depression and suicidal behavior, which justifies the development of innovative therapeutic options. Current management is essentially based on psychological therapy and / or prosthetic, to improve for hearing loss that can be frequently associated. In fact, the main objective is habituation for these patients, but when the tinnitus is too intense, it is impossible. Three recent publications in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have reported a novel physiopathological hypothesis to explain the appearance of subjective tinnitus. They highlight the prominent role of the right operculum 3 (OP3), a deep opercular region (parieto-insular junction) in the emergence of this symptom. The investigators hypothesize that inhibition of this region using high frequency stimulation could, significantly improve the intensity of the symptom and consequently their quality of life in this selected population.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between 18 and 75 years old,
  2. Uni or bilateral permanent non-pulsatile tinnitus, without associated vestibular pathology, with or without hearing loss,
  3. Severe tinnitus resistant to treatment failure,
  4. Tinnitus intensity on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ≥ 7,
  5. Presenting a quality of life score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire> 76 (= grade 5),
  6. Social security affiliates or beneficiaries of such a scheme
  7. Informed and written consent signed by the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Vestibular dysfunction (balance disorder),
  2. Epilepsy,
  3. Intercurrent serious pathology,
  4. Brain tumor,
  5. Contraindication to surgery or anesthesia,
  6. History of cerebral infection with herpesvirus,
  7. With a contraindication to the practice of MRI, MEG, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan,
  8. Under anticoagulants and antiaggregants (Anti vitamin K, low molecular weight heparin, aspirin and derivatives, clopidogrel antiplatelet agents and assimilated, new oral anticoagulants (NACO)) for which a therapeutic window can not be opened within 3 months before and after the surgery,
  9. Included in another therapeutic protocol,
  10. Progressive dementia or psychiatric illness,
  11. Presenting a suicidal risk deemed important for less than 3 months (Montgomery and Asberg depression scale (MADRS): suicidality item (item 10) score> 2),
  12. Enforced hospitalisation,
  13. Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding, lack of contraception in patients with the capacity to procreate,
  14. Subject to a legal protection measure,
  15. Deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision,
  16. Isolated patient without any contact in case of emergency.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) activated
Patients with severe permanent non-pulsatile tinnitus treated by Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in position ON
Device: DBS
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the parieto-insular region at the level of the right operculum 3 (OP3)
Other: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) non-activated
Patients with severe permanent non-pulsatile tinnitus treated by Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in position OFF
Device: DBS
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the parieto-insular region at the level of the right operculum 3 (OP3)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of the treatment using Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the right operculum 3 (OP3).
Time Frame: 2.5 months
Difference in intensity of tinnitus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0/10 : higher scores mean better outcome] between the end and the beginning of each of the two periods of the crossover.
2.5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of DBS Treatment on Emergent Adverse Events (Tolerance) after surgical intervention and stimulation following the implantation of the DBS medical device.
Time Frame: 15 months
Emergent Adverse events (partial or general epileptic seizures, worsening of tinnitus, surgical complications, ...): 1) post-operative computed tomography (CT); 2) Clinical evaluation.
15 months
Evaluation of the subjective effect of stimulation on quality of life.
Time Frame: 15 months
Scores on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire [0/100 : higher scores mean worse outcome] at 6 months (early phase) and at 15 months compared to the preoperative THI of the same patient.
15 months
Evaluation of the subjective effect of stimulation on anxiety / depression.
Time Frame: 15 months
Scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) [0/21 : higher scores mean worse outcome] at 6 months (early phase) and at 15 months compared to preoperative HAD of the same patient.
15 months
Changes comparison of the connectivity of OP3 explored by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) at 1.5 T.
Time Frame: 15 months
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging records (fMRI 1.5 T) performed preoperatively and at 15 months postoperatively.
15 months
Connectivities changes of the right OP3 measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG) at baseline 'preoperatively) and the post op (within 1 week) and at long term follow up (15 months) with active stimulation (ON) and inactive (OFF) during MEG recording.
Time Frame: 15 months
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records at baseline (preoperatively) and the post op (within 1 week) and at long term follow up (15 months) with active stimulation (ON) and inactive (OFF) during MEG recording.
15 months
Characterization of the Local Field Potential (LFP) recorded and correlations with tinnitus features perceived by the patient, based on their intensity and characteristic.
Time Frame: One week
Local Field Potential (LFP) records on the electrode when the patient perceives tinnitus features 1) intraoperatively 2) before the implantation of the stimulator.
One week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Grenoble

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Commissariat A L'energie Atomique
Équipe 5 Neuroimagerie et perfusion cérébrale, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 10, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 38RC18.208
  • 2019-A01562-55 (Other Identifier: ANSM ID RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings