Biological Effects of a Bipolar Radiofrequency-based Device Over Shoulder Cartilage (Alexsen)

March 12, 2020 updated by: Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Biological Effects of a Bipolar Radiofrequency-based Device Over Shoulder Cartilage - a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

In the non-weight bearing glenohumeral joint, focal chondral defects are encountered infrequently and are usually found in association with other pathologies, such as glenohumeral instability, postoperative chondrolysis, focal osteonecrosis, septic arthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, and rotator cuff tears. Several studies revealed that approximately one-third of patients with rotator cuff disease have concomitant articular cartilage lesions. Because the glenohumeral articular cartilage is one of the thinnest in the body, the overall accuracy of non-contrast MRI in detecting glenohumeral articular cartilage lesions is moderate and it is difficult to have an accurate characterization of a lesion my MRI. So, currently, arthroscopy is considered the ''gold standard'' for glenohumeral cartilage assessment. Even if the literature lacks high-quality evidence regarding the nonsurgical and surgical treatment options for patients with shoulder chondral defects, in these scenarios, where, in our experience, the most of the lesions are small, diffuse and of ICRS grade 2 or 3 (non-full thickness), arthroscopic debridement is a good option for addressing glenohumeral chondropathy. The main drawbacks with this type of procedure are the removal of underlying healthy cartilage and the potential lack of chondral surface smoothing. Alternatives used to perform arthroscopic chondral debridement is thermal application, carried out by the use of laser devices or the application of monopolar or bipolar radiofrequency (RF). As regards the glenohumeral joint, there are several studies that underlined the potential benefit of arthroscopic debridement in glenohumeral chondropathy and early stage of osteoarthritis, but the type of debridement used in all these studies was mechanical or not specified. Because recent studies showed that Compared to conventional MD, 50° RF treatment appears to be a superior method based on short- and medium-term clinical outcomes and the progression of knee osteoarthritis [11], we want to specifically evaluate the effects of RF in patients with grade II or III chondropathy found during arthroscopy for rotator cuff disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, therapeutic open blind randomized study. The enrollment of the patients will start immediately after the ethical committee approval. Considering our cases and our experience we plan to reach 40 patients (20 patients for group) which respect the inclusion and exclusion criteria in 2 months. We plan to enroll 6 more patients (3 for each group) in order to cover eventual loss of patients during the follow-up and these patients will be evaluated after surgery only if there will not be any losses among the initial 40 patients. During surgery, assessment of the chondropathy will be done and only patients with International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) grade 2 or 3 chondropathy will be enrolled. After addressing the rotator cuff pathology, the patient will be randomized and the radio-frequency (RF) debridement will be performed or not performed, so the patients will enter the control group (no RF) or the treatment group. The clinical evaluation will be performed by R.R., preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. At 3 months post-operatively an MRI will be obtained and assessed by an expert shoulder doctor with particular attention for the cartilage. All the data will be completed and analyzed in about 12-13 months after the enrollment is completed and we estimate to present the data by May 2020.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Milano
      • Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
        • Recruiting
        • Humanitas Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 50-70 years.
  2. Arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff disorders.
  3. Arthroscopic findings of ICRS grade 2 or 3 chondropathy.
  4. Ability to give informed consent according to the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH)-Good Clinical Practices (GCP), and national/local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis before surgery.
  2. Patients with ICRS grade 4 chondropathy.
  3. Patients who received subacromial decompression.
  4. Patients who received biceps tenodesis after tenotomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: RF
The bipolar radiofrequency-based chondroplasty device is used in the COBLATION mode (yellow) with The WEREWOLF system and the wand FLOW 50 in Lo mode (low) which are approved by the FDA for chondroplasty and debridement of the articular cartilage
Device: WEREWOLF COBLATION System
The bipolar radiofrequency-based chondroplasty device is used in the COBLATION mode (yellow) with The WEREWOLF system and the wand FLOW 50 in Lo mode (low) which are approved by the FDA for chondroplasty and debridement of the articular cartilage; fibrillations were removed and the surface was smoothed. This low energy and low suction setting minimizes damage to healthy chondrocytes surrounding and is therefore the preferred setting for the removal of articular cartilage.
Active Comparator: Control
The mechanical shaver is used to remove superficial fibrillations.
Procedure: control
mechanical debridement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of pain reduction
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
it will be assessed with numeric rating scale (NRS) questionnaire (0 no ain-10 thw worst pain).
12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
It will be evaluated during clinical examination using a goniometer in terms of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation with elbow at side (ER1), external rotation with elbow at 90° degree of abduction (ER2), and internal rotation (level reached from the hand on the back side)
12 months after surgery
Improvement of the subjective evaluation of the shoulder condition with the simple shoulder test (SST)
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
SST is a self-reported shoulder-specific questionnaire that measures functional limitations of the affected shoulder in patients with shoulder dysfunction. The SST consists of 12 questions with dichotomous (yes/ no) response options.
12 months after surgery
Improvement of the subjective evaluation of the shoulder condition and the pain with the Constant-Murley (CM) test
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient (100 best shoulder condition-0 worst shoulder condition).
12 months after surgery
Improvement of the shoulder condition with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
High resolution MRI will be acquired and evaluated by the radiologist
3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 831

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings