The Effects of Manual Therapy in Hemophilic Patients

March 13, 2020 updated by: Necati Muhammed TAT, Necmettin Erbakan University

The Effectiveness of Manual Theraphy on Lower Extremity Joint Arthropathy in Patients With Hemophilia

Uncertainty about how to treat existing hemophilic arthropathy (HA) is the most important issue that will increase functionality and joint health. Recent studies have shown that MT can be used safely for improving joint health, pain and ROM with no bleedings in PwH with elbow and ankle HA. Unlike MT studies in hemophilia, we investigated the effects of MT on important parameters such as muscle strength (MS), functional level, joint health, functional independence score in hemophilia (FISH) and kinesiophobia. These parameters are closely related to functional level and quality of life of PwH. Therefore, evaluation of these parameters and determining the effects of the MT on these parameters are very important for both PwH and also clinicians.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of manual therapy in addition to home exercise program on hemophilia functional independence level, joint health, kinesiophobia, functional level, range of motion, muscle strength and pain level in hemophilic individuals with lower extremity joint arthropathy. Hemophilic arthropathy was developed in at least one of the lower extremity joints and aged between 18-30 years 17 severe type hemophilic men were participated in the study. The participants were divided into two groups as Home Exercise Group (HEG) and Manual Therapy Group (MTG) by randomization method. While the HEG was performed the exercise program at home, in addition to the same HEG manual therapy were applied to the MTG by the same physiotherapist 3 days a week for 1 hour. Both groups were followed for a total of 5 weeks and pre-treatment evaluations were repeated post-treatment. The joint health of the hemophilics in both groups were evaluated with Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), their kinesiophobia level were evaluated with Tampa Kinesophobia Scale, their functionality with the Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH). In addition, Functional Reach, Timed Up and Go and 5 Times Sit-to- Stand tests were used for functional level. The range of motion was evaluated with a goniometer, muscle strength was measured with a digital dynamometer and pain level was assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Number of hemarthrosis decreased in both groups.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Sarıcam
      • Adana, Sarıcam, Turkey, 01330
        • Cukurova University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hemophilia who have arthropathy developed in any of the lower extremity joints due to severe hemophilia and to be receiving regular prophylaxis (3*1500 IU/ per week), but not having regular physical activity and sports.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hemophilia who had any disease related to connective tissue, any surgery that affects lower limb function (joint debridement, fracture, prosthesis), any neurological disease or cognitive impairment that may affect functional level, any sensorial loss of peripheral nerve injury and did not attend their sessions and evaluations regularly.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Manual Therapy
The experienced physiotherapist has applied manual therapy (MT) to the arthropathic joints. MT was started with myofascial release techniques (MRT), then continued with mobilization techniques using Kalternborn. Superficial MRT consisted of 3 strokes, via manual movement on the tissue, encourage release of the superficial fascia. In the Kalternborn mobilization technique, Grade I-II mobilization was applied with traction without using a strap. The same exercises given to the home exercise group were given to the patients in this group as well.
Other: Manual therapy
Both groups received for 3 sessions per week, a total of 5 weeks. Home exercises were performed by the patient for 30 minutes at home.In home exercises active ROM for warm-up (5 min), passive stretchening (5 min), strengthening exercises (10 min), proprioceptive and balance exercises (10 min). In manual therapy group, myofascial release techniques (MRT) and Kalternborn mobilization techniques lasted about one hour. In MRT, each manuever was applied for 2 mins and 3 times. The superficial strokes were performed, assisted by slight movements of joints. MRT to posterior capsule of the knee, ligaments, iliotibial tractus, plantar fascia, metatarsal, tarsals, and toes. Kalterborb mobilization tecnqiues; posterior gliding for restricted knee flexion, anterior gliding for restricted knee extension,talocrural posteior gliding for dorsal flexion, talocrural anterior gliding for plantar flexion.3 * 10 repetitions, 20 sec of per reps and 10 sec of interval.
Other Names:
  • Home exercise
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Home Exercise
The home exercises (HE) consisted of active ROM exercises, passive stretching exercises, progressive resistive exercises, weigh-bearing and stance exercises were performed by the patient for 30 minutes at home.
Other: Manual therapy
Both groups received for 3 sessions per week, a total of 5 weeks. Home exercises were performed by the patient for 30 minutes at home.In home exercises active ROM for warm-up (5 min), passive stretchening (5 min), strengthening exercises (10 min), proprioceptive and balance exercises (10 min). In manual therapy group, myofascial release techniques (MRT) and Kalternborn mobilization techniques lasted about one hour. In MRT, each manuever was applied for 2 mins and 3 times. The superficial strokes were performed, assisted by slight movements of joints. MRT to posterior capsule of the knee, ligaments, iliotibial tractus, plantar fascia, metatarsal, tarsals, and toes. Kalterborb mobilization tecnqiues; posterior gliding for restricted knee flexion, anterior gliding for restricted knee extension,talocrural posteior gliding for dorsal flexion, talocrural anterior gliding for plantar flexion.3 * 10 repetitions, 20 sec of per reps and 10 sec of interval.
Other Names:
  • Home exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemophilia Joint Health Score
Time Frame: 5 week
We used the index point of joints. Score ranged from 0 to 20. Low score indicates the good joint health
5 week
Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia
Time Frame: 5 week
We used the functional independence of patients. Score ranged from 0 to 32. High score indicates the functional independence.
5 week
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: 5 week
Score higher than 37 were associated with a high degree of kinesiophobia.
5 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of motion
Time Frame: 5 week
Joint range was measured with a universal goniometer.
5 week
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 5 week
It was measured with hand-held dynamometer.
5 week
Numerical Pain Scale
Time Frame: 5 week
It was used for assessment of activity and resting pain.
5 week
Frequency bleeding
Time Frame: 5 week
It was evaluated from the diaries kept by the patients
5 week
Functional Reach
Time Frame: 5 week
It was used to assess dynamic balance.
5 week
Timed Up and Go
Time Frame: 5 week
It was used to evaluate functional mobility, dynamic balance, fall risk and postural stability.
5 week
5 Times Sit to Stand
Time Frame: 5 week
It was evaluated the functional strength of lower extremity, transitive movements, balance and fall risk.
5 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Necmettin Erbakan University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Filiz CAN, Professor, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
  • Study Director: Ilgen SASMAZ, Professor, Cukurova University
  • Study Director: Ali Bulent ANTMEN, Professor, Acıbadem Adana Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 12, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 15, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Necmettin Erb. Physiotherapy-2

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings