An Evaluation of the Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) Intervention (FACT)

March 3, 2024 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Evidence of Efficacy of the Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) Intervention

This is a pilot feasibility and acceptability study to inform the development and testing of a novel communication intervention to support parents in their communication with children about cancer. The research questions to be answered by this study are whether the intervention being tested can be feasible and acceptable, and provide preliminary estimates of improvement in parental psychological distress.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-arm, single center pilot study using a pretest-posttest design to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a psychosocial intervention, Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT). The purpose of the intervention is to decrease parental anxiety by facilitating parental communication about cancer with their children. The primary hypothesis being tested is that an intervention that assists parents with their communication needs with their children can be feasible, acceptable, and reduce parental psychological distress. Findings from this study will inform a future grant application to further test this intervention in a randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • University of North Carolina Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent reviewed and signed;
  • Age equal to or above 18 years;
  • Ability to understand and comply with study procedures;
  • Be a parent, primary caregiver, or guardian of at least one child between the ages of 3-19 years old with whom the subject has regular contact. The child must have cognitive ability to understand verbal communication;
  • Have a new or recurrent diagnosis of invasive solid tumor malignancy within the past 6 months or have a solid tumor cancer diagnosis with disease that is either stage IV or equivalent;
  • Have a cancer diagnosis that is likely to require systemic anti-neoplastic therapy, non-office based surgical intervention, radiation therapy, or palliative care/hospice within the next three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete self-report instruments due to illiteracy, neurologic illness, inability to speak or read English, or other causes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: FACT
Patients will receive access to intervention materials.
Behavioral: FACT
Customized communication guidance to help parents with cancer talk about their cancer with their children.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of the Intervention Measured by the Study Visit Satisfaction Form FACT Was Helpful
Time Frame: 14 days
Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed through participants' satisfaction ratings used a study-specific satisfaction scale, "Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) satisfaction scale." Four-items (0=not at all, 3=very), higher scores indicate more satisfaction.
14 days
Acceptability of the Intervention Assessed Via Semi-structured Interviews
Time Frame: 14 days
Participants were interviewed about their experiences with the study intervention using semi-structured interviews. Parents' comments on the intervention "helped them feel more comfortable and prepared to talk with their children about their illness" were graded as participants overall intervention satisfaction.
14 days
Acceptability of the Intervention Measured by the Study Visit Satisfaction Form-FACT Was Useful
Time Frame: 14 days
Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed through participants' satisfaction ratings used a study-specific satisfaction scale, "Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) satisfaction scale." Four-items (0=not at all, 3=very), higher scores indicate more satisfaction.
14 days
Acceptability of the Intervention Measured by the Study Visit Satisfaction Form Content Was Important
Time Frame: 14 days
Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed through participants' satisfaction ratings used a study-specific satisfaction scale, "Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) satisfaction scale." Four-items (0=not at all, 3=very), higher scores indicate more satisfaction.
14 days
Acceptability of the Intervention Measured by the Study Visit Satisfaction Form- Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 14 days
Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed through participants' satisfaction ratings used a study-specific satisfaction scale, "Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT) satisfaction scale." Four-items (0=not at all, 3=very), higher scores indicate more satisfaction.
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Screening
Time Frame: Baseline
The number of subjects who were screened, recruited, and retained in the study were reported.
Baseline
Feasibility of Recruitment
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of patients who enroll in the study
Baseline
Communication Self-efficacy Measured by the Adapted Communication Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days, 84 days
Assess the change in patient's communication self-efficacy. The adapted Communication Self-Efficacy scale is a 9-item Visual Analogue Scale assessing parent's confidence in their ability to tell their child about parental medical illness. The score range is 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher confidence.
Baseline, 14 days, 84 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eliza Park, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 27, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 27, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LCCC2030

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings