Early Treatment of Cytokine Storm Syndrome in Covid-19

August 1, 2023 updated by: W Winn Chatham, University of Alabama at Birmingham
This proposal addresses the problem of preventing the very high mortality and morbidity associated with the development of Cytokine Storm Syndrome (CSS) associated respiratory failure in Covid-19 infection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The first aim of this project is to determine whether rapidly assayed early clinical laboratory markers of CSS (eCSS: leucopenia, lymphopenia, and elevated ferritin, d-dimer, LDH, CRP, and AST/ALT) in patients admitted to the hospital with respiratory compromise in the setting of Covid-19 infection can accurately identify patients with CSS as defined by validated CSS case definitions (H-Score, aHLH-2004). Confirmation of eCSS predictive of evolving CSS will identify patients at risk for rapid deterioration of lung function and inform early initiation of treatment for CSS. Genotyping studies will also be performed on patients with confirmed CSS to determine whether perforin pathway mutations commonly present in CSS associated with other disorders are present. The second aim is to determine whether early treatment with rhIL-1Ra (anakinra) in patients admitted to the hospital with markers of CSS improves or prevents deterioration of respiratory dysfunction and prevents the development of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years old or older
  2. Molecular (pcRNA) diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
  3. Chest imaging studies consistent with Covid-19 pneumonia
  4. Hyperferritinemia (>700 ng/ml)
  5. History of fever >38 degrees C

  6. Any three of the following:

    1. Elevated d-dimer (> 500 ng/ml)
    2. thrombocytopenia (< 130,000/mm3)
    3. leucopenia (WBC <3500/mm3) or lymphopenia (<1000/mm3)
    4. elevated AST or ALT (> 2X ULN)
    5. elevated LDH (> 2X ULN)
    6. CRP > 100 mg/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in other investigational treatment protocols for Covid-19 infection
  2. Culture confirmed active bacterial infection requiring antibiotic therapy
  3. On mechanical ventilation
  4. Previous known hypersensitivity reaction to anakinra
  5. Previous known hypersensitivity reaction to E Coli derived proteins
  6. Pregnant or breast-feeding females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Anakinra Group
The active treatment group will receive anakinra 100 mg subcutaneously every 6 hours for period of 10 days. For subjects meeting complete response criteria at 5 days, dosing will be decreased to 100 mg twice daily for the remaining 5 days.
Drug: Anakinra
The active treatment group will receive anakinra 100 mg subcutaneously every 6-12 hours for a period of 10 days
Other Names:
  • recombinant human IL-ra (rhIL-1ra)
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
The control group will receive normal saline placebo subcutaneously every 6 hours for period of 10 days. For subjects meeting complete response criteria at 5 days, dosing will be decreased to twice daily for the remaining 5 days.
Drug: Normal saline
The control group will receive normal saline placebo subcutaneously every 6-12 hours for period of 10 days
Other Names:
  • NS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjects Discharged From the Hospital Alive and Without the Need for Mechanical Ventilation.
Time Frame: Variable up to Day 28
Percentage of subjects discharged from hospital alive and who did not require intubation and mechanical ventilation
Variable up to Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects With 25% Change (Decrease) in Cytokine Storm Markers at 48-72 Hours After Dosing With Study Agent
Time Frame: 48 hours after taking initial dose of anakinra/placebo
25% change (decrease) in noted baseline elevations of serum ferritin and CRP measured 48-72 hours after following initial dosing of anakinra/placebo.
48 hours after taking initial dose of anakinra/placebo
Percentage of Subjects Without Increase in Oxygen Requirement and no Increase in Oxygen Delivery/Respiratory Support Measures After 48 Hours.
Time Frame: Day 2 (48 hours)-Day 10 (240 hours)
Supplemental oxygen requirement to maintain oxygen saturation >90% stable or decreased without escalation of respiratory support measures (addition of CPAP, initiation of mechanical ventilation)
Day 2 (48 hours)-Day 10 (240 hours)
Patients Requiring Minimal Oxygen Support at Day 10
Time Frame: 0-10 days
Percentage of participants requiring no more than 2 L/min nasal canula oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation >93% by Day 10
0-10 days
Percentage of Subjects With Resolution of Laboratory Markers of Cytokine Storm Syndrome
Time Frame: Day 10
Normalization or ≥ 75% improvement by Day 10 (120 hours) in each (all) of the following laboratory CSS attributes elevated beyond the normal range at randomization: ferritin, d-dimer, CRP, and LDH.
Day 10
Percentage of Subjects Who Develop Bacterial or Fungal or Non-Covid-19 Viral Infection
Time Frame: Day 0-28
Occurence of new bacterial or fungal or viral infection through the time of hospital discharge or Day 28.
Day 0-28
Absence of Supplemental Oxygen Requirement at Day 10
Time Frame: 0-10 Days
Percentage of participants able to maintain oxygen saturation >93% on room air by Day 10
0-10 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Walter W Chatham, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Chatham-Cytokine Covid-19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Contact PI by e-mail for protocol specifics Submission of results for peer reviewed publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

During study enrollment

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

wchatham@uabmc.edu

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings