Photographic Posture Analysis in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Reliability of Photographic Posture Analysis in Children With Cerebral Palsy and Its Relationship With Trunk Control and Motor Functions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Etimesgut
-
Ankara, Etimesgut, Turkey, 06790
- Baskent University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 5-12 years,
- Diagnosed as spastic diplegia or hemiplegia,
- Having a level of "I, II, III" according to GMFCS
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children who could not cooperate,
- Have undergone spinal surgery, had botulinum toxin (BoNT) and surgical treatment in the last 6 months
- Had another neurodevelopmental or congenital disease other than CP
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Children with Cerebral Palsy
Aged 5-12 years, diagnosed as spastic diplegia or hemiplegia , having a level of "I, II, III" according to GMFCS
|
Postural evaluation was done using the photographic method.
All measurements were made by two researchers experienced in postural analysis evaluation.
Canon camera and national geographic tripod with double spirit level were used for evaluation.
The camera was placed on a 115 cm high tripod, 1.5 m away from the subjects.
Spirit levels have been adjusted so that the tripod is completely flat on the ground.
The tripod was taped to the floor to maintain the same distance between the camera and the participants.
Six photographs of each child whose feet on the ground, in a free-sitting position, 3 from the front and 3 sides were taken by the researchers.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Photographic Posture Analysis
Time Frame: 45-60 minutes
|
Postural evaluation was done using the photographic method.
All measurements were made by two researchers experienced in postural analysis evaluation.
Canon camera and national geographic tripod with double spirit level were used for evaluation Six photographs of each child whose feet on the ground, in a free-sitting position, 3 from the front and 3 sides were taken by the researchers
|
45-60 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)
Time Frame: 30-40 minutes
|
Trunk control was evaluated with Trunk Control Measurement Scale is a scale that measures the static and dynamic sitting balance in children with CP.
It consists of 15 items in total, 1-5 items measure Static Sitting Balance, 6-15 items measure dynamic sitting balance.
Static sitting balance assesses the ability of children to maintain the trunk posture as they move their upper and lower limbs in the sitting posture.
Dynamic sitting balance is divided into two sub-scales; selective motion control scale and dynamic reach scale.
The maximum score that can be obtained from the test is 58.
Higher scores perform better.
|
30-40 minutes
|
|
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: 30-45 minutes
|
GMFM-88 is a standardized observational test designed to measure the motor development levels of children with SP and their changes over time.
It consists of five main headings and 88 items: lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; walking, running, and jumping.
17 of the 88 items are on the lying and rolling part, 20 on the sitting part, 14 on the crawling and kneeling part, 13 on the standing part, and 24 on the walking, running, and jumping part.
Likert scale is used in scoring.
The child gets 0 points if he / she cannot start the movement, 1 if he / she can start the movement independently, 2 if he / she can partially complete the movement, and 3 if he / she can complete the movement independently.
A 5-year-old child with normal development is expected to score full of 88 items.
The GMFM-88 was administered to the children by therapists trained in its use and tested to ensure an adequate level of competence by using a criterion test videotape
|
30-45 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Nilay Çömük Balcı, Pt,PhD, Baskent University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KA19/126
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.