Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss
Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss Post-Approval Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
- Recruiting
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
-
Contact:
- Kari Smilsky, M.CI.Sc.
- Phone Number: 416-480-6100
- Email: kari.smilsky@sunnybrook.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Kari Smilsky, M.CI.Sc.
-
-
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Withdrawn
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242-1078
- Recruiting
- University of Iowa
-
Contact:
- Camille Dunn, PhD
- Phone Number: 319-353-8776
- Email: camille_dunn@uiowa.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Camille Dunn, PhD
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10003
- Recruiting
- New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
-
Contact:
- Samantha Udondem, MPH
- Phone Number: 347-978-3973
- Email: samantha.udondem@mountsinai.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Maura Cosetti, MD
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517
- Active, not recruiting
- University of North Carolina
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
- Recruiting
- Virginia Mason Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Kelly Robertson
- Phone Number: 206-287-6263
- Email: Kelly.Robertson@virginiamason.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Daniel Zietler, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Five years of age or older at the time of implantation
- Unilateral profound hearing loss, as defined by a pure-tone average (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) of 90 dB or greater in the ear to be implanted
- Sensorineural hearing loss in the ear to be implanted, as defined by an air-bone gap less than or equal to 10 dB at two or more frequencies out of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz and a diagnosed pathology of the outer or middle ear
- Normal hearing or mild to moderate hearing loss in the non-implanted ear, as defined by a pure-tone average (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) of 55 dB or less
- Word recognition in the ear to be implanted of 5% or less on CNC word score in quiet
- Previous experience with an appropriately-fit Contralateral Routing of Signal (CROS) hearing aid, BI-Contralateral Routing of Signal (CROS) hearing aid, bone conduction, or traditional hearing aid, as deemed appropriate by investigator
- Fluent in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Duration of profound hearing loss of 10 years or more
- Absence of cochlear development or non-functionality of cochlear nerve
- Other retrocochlear hearing loss
- Evidence of severe cochlear malformation (i.e., common cavity or ossification)
- External or middle ear infection
- Suspected developmental or cognitive concern
- Other medical contraindication for surgery or anesthesia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Study Procedure
|
Cochlear implant and audio processor
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Long-term performance of the Cochlear Implant System will be assessed through speech perception testing in noise completed through three years (36 months) post implantation
Time Frame: Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
The primary effectiveness endpoint will be change on speech in noise when speech is presented to the front and noise is presented to the acoustic hearing (contralateral) ear.
The pre-operative, best-aided score will be compared to the 12-month and 36-month CI score for AzBio sentences in noise(range of score 0-100, higher score is better).
Improvement is defined as greater than or equal to 10 percentage points.
|
Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Long term performance of the Cochlear Implant System will be summarized through speech perception testing in noise completed through three years (36 months) post implantation
Time Frame: Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
Speech in noise in two spatial conditions will demonstrate similar performance from the pre-operative, best-aided score to the CI score at 12 and 36 months post-activation.
AzBio sentence in noise score will be summarized for two conditions: speech and noise presented from the front as well as speech presented to the front and noise presented to the CI ear.(Range of score 0-100, higher score is better)
|
Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
|
Long term performance of the Cochlear Implant System will be assessed through speech perception testing in quiet completed through three (36 months) post implantation
Time Frame: Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
Speech perception in quiet will be summarized for the CI ear as well as the contralateral ear at the pre-operative, 12-month, and 36-month intervals.
The CI ear is expected to demonstrate improvement (greater than or equal to 10 percentage point change), while the contralateral ear is expected to demonstrate no change.
(Range of score 0-100, higher score is better)
|
Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
|
Long term subjective benefit of the Cochlear Implant System will be assessed through three years (36 months) post implantation
Time Frame: Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
Subjective data will be collected via the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).
Responses will be summarized from the pre-operative, 12-month, and 36-month intervals.(Range of score 0-10, lower score is better)
|
Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
|
Long term safety will be evaluated for all study subjects through three (36 months) years post implantation
Time Frame: Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
Safety will be assessed by collecting and reporting device-related adverse events occurring throughout the study.
This will be summarized and reported as the number and proportion of subjects experiencing an adverse device event.
|
Three years (36 months) post implantation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Vermeire K, Van de Heyning P. Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(3):163-71. doi: 10.1159/000171478. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
- Van de Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D. Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Sep;117(9):645-52. doi: 10.1177/000348940811700903.
- Arndt S, Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F, Beck R, Wesarg T. Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. HNO. 2017 Aug;65(Suppl 2):98-108. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0297-5.
- Arndt S, Prosse S, Laszig R, Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F. Cochlear implantation in children with single-sided deafness: does aetiology and duration of deafness matter? Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:21-30. doi: 10.1159/000380744. Epub 2015 May 19.
- Buss E, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, King ER, Deres EJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD. Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518771173. doi: 10.1177/2331216518771173.
- Dillon MT, Buss E, Rooth MA, King ER, Deres EJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD. Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss. Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(4-5):259-271. doi: 10.1159/000484079. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
- Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Jan;24(1):73-8. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200301000-00015.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P000025/S113
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.