Advanced Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (ACST)

September 10, 2020 updated by: University College, London

Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of Advanced Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (ACST) for People With Moderate to Severe Dementia

This study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) for an evidence-based intervention for people with moderate to severe dementia. The psychosocial intervention is adapted from Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) and developed within the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The World Health Organization calls for an increase of psychosocial interventions for dementia-a global epidemic. Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) is the only non-pharmacological therapy recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for improving cognition for mild to moderate dementia. However, there is little guidance on how to maximise cognition for severe dementia. Advanced Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (ACST) will be the first evidence-based complex intervention for moderate to severe dementia developed within the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework and building upon CST's key principles. This feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to 1) evaluate the feasibility of ACST 2) explore if ACST can improve the cognitive function, and QoL, as well as other outcomes including behaviour, engagement, and communication, for people with moderate to severe dementia. A sample of 32 participants will be recruited, where 16 will be randomly allocated to ACST, and 16 to treatment as usual (TAU). Data will be collected pre and post the 7-week intervention period. Improving cognition and QoL for people with moderate to severe dementia is vital because dementia's prevalence is projected to reach 152 million by 2050, resulting in excessive excess disability.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18
  2. Diagnosis of dementia, according to the DSM-IV
  3. SMMSE ≤ 12
  4. Ability to communicate in English
  5. Ability to complete outcome measures
  6. Not having major physical illness or disability that affects participation
  7. Consultee is willing and able to provide written informed consent if the participant is not able to provide consent.
  8. Ability to remain in a group for around an hour (e.g. no challenging behaviour)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Illness and disability that affects participation (as deemed by the researcher or attending care home staff)
  2. SMMSE < 5
  3. Participation in other psychosocial intervention studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Advanced Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
Advanced Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (ACST), a psychosocial intervention, is the modified version of CST for people with moderate and severe dementia. Activities consist of more multisensory stimulation elements than the original CST. ACST will be prescribed to participants 45-minutes per week, biweekly for 7 weeks. The intervention will be delivered by two facilitators, such as a research staff, clinical psychologist trainee or care home staff.
Other: Advanced Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
An adapted version of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for people with moderate to severe dementia.
No Intervention: Treatment as usual
Standard care in care homes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment (feasibility of ACST)
Time Frame: Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Feasibility of recruitment by successful recruitment of the target sample of 32 in a 24-month period.
Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Retention rate (feasibility of ACST)
Time Frame: Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Retention rate of at least 75% of participants at 8-week follow-up.
Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Negative or adverse events (acceptability of ACST)
Time Frame: Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Any negative or adverse events related to the intervention
Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Intervention fidelity (acceptability of ACST)
Time Frame: Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Facilitator's completion of the fidelity checklist following each session
Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Intervention fidelity (acceptability of ACST)
Time Frame: Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years
Video recording of all sessions and an independent researcher rating fidelity with a random 10% of the recordings.
Descriptive data will be collected during the study and analysed post-intervention; through study completion, 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cognitive function
Time Frame: Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Exploratory primary outcome; measured pre and post intervention with Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (Molloy & Standish, 1997) and Test for Severe Impairment (Albert & Cohen, 1992). SMMSE has 11 questions with scores from 0 to 30, where a low score indicates poor performance. TSI has six domains: motor performance, language comprehension, language production, memory, general knowledge, and conceptualisation. Each domain has a maximum score of 4, and a higher score indicates better cognitive ability.
Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Exploratory primary outcome; measured pre and post test with Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) (Logsdon et al., 2002). QoL-AD has 13-items, and a sum score range from 13 to 52; higher score denotes better quality of life.
Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Change in behaviour
Time Frame: Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Exploratory secondary outcome; measured pre and post test with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (Cummings et al., 1997). NPI consists of 12 domains. Each question asks for a frequency of symptoms on a 4-point score, severity on a 3-point score, and distress on a 5-point scale. Higher score denotes higher frequency and severity.
Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Change in communication abilities
Time Frame: Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Exploratory secondary outcome; measured pre and post test with the Holden Communication Scale (Holden & Woods, 1995). Each item contains is on a 5 point scale, and the questionnaire has a maximum score of 48, where a higher score indicates difficulties in communication.
Pre test (baseline: week 0) and post test (week 8)
Change in engagement
Time Frame: Evaluated by facilitator after every other session, and independent researcher through recordings; through study completion, up to 24-months
Exploratory secondary outcome; measured with the Group Observational Measurement of Engagement Tool (Cohen-Mansfield et al., 2017). GOME consists of 5-domains: attendance, engagement, active participation, attitude, and sleep. Each item is measured on a 4- or 7-point Likert scale from 0, none of the time, to 6, all of the time.
Evaluated by facilitator after every other session, and independent researcher through recordings; through study completion, up to 24-months
Change in overall well-being
Time Frame: Evaluated by assessor through video recordings for every session; through study completion, 2 years
Exploratory secondary outcome; measured with the Adapted Greater Cincinnati Chapter Well-Being Observation Tool (Adapted GCCWBOT) (Kinney & Rentz, 2005). The facilitator or independent researcher will assess 4 participants at a time. Each evaluation will be 62 minutes, and 8 domains will be assessed: interest, attention, pleasure, self-esteem, normalcy, disengagement, sadness, and negative affect.
Evaluated by assessor through video recordings for every session; through study completion, 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University College, London

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Aimee Spector, PhD, DClinPsych, University College, London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 134729

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Study results and IPD will be published in a doctoral thesis, peer-reviewed journals, and presented at conferences, and disseminated to the public through information sheets. Participants who indicate their interest in receiving further information regarding dissemination will be sent a letter with the main findings of the study upon completion. Other researchers can email authors for IPD.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Email authors

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Advanced Cognitive Stimulation Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings