RELATE - Efficacy and Feasibility of a Cognitive Behavioural Module for Distressing Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (RELATE)

August 24, 2024 updated by: Matthias Pillny, University of Hamburg-Eppendorf

RELATE - A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cognitive Behavioural Module for Distressing Auditory Verbal Hallucinations

Auditory hallucinations (AH) are associated with distress and reduced functioning. Psychological interventions show some promising effects on psychopathology but have been less successful in reducing AH related distress, which patients report to be a priority. Research suggests that distress is associated with the hearer relating to AH in a passive and subordinate manner. A novel approach thus teaches assertive responses to AH through the use of experiential role-plays. A single centre pilot study in the United Kingdom evidenced a large effect of this approach on AH distress but independent multicentre studies are required to ascertain effectiveness across different settings. The planned feasibility trial aims to estimate the expected effect for a subsequent fully powered prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, two-armed, multicentre, open trial set up to demonstrate that adding a Relating Module (RM) to Treatment as Usual (TAU) is superior to TAU alone. Feasibility questions relate to patient recruitment, therapist training and therapy monitoring in different types of psychological and psychiatric outpatient facilities.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Auditory hallucinations (AH) are associated with distress and reduced functioning. Psychological interventions show some promising effects on psychopathology but have been less successful in reducing AH related distress, which patients report to be a priority. Research suggests that distress is associated with the hearer relating to AH in a passive and subordinate manner. A novel approach thus teaches assertive responses to AH through the use of experiential role-plays. A single centre pilot study in the United Kingdom evidenced a large effect of this approach on AH distress but independent multicentre studies are required to ascertain effectiveness across different settings. The planned feasibility trial aims to estimate the expected effect for a subsequent fully powered prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, two-armed, multicentre, open trial set up to demonstrate that adding a Relating Module (RM) to Treatment as Usual (TAU) is superior to TAU alone. Feasibility questions relate to patient recruitment, therapist training and therapy monitoring in different types of psychological and psychiatric outpatient facilities. A total of 75 patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (ICD-10, F2) and persistent distressing AH will be recruited across 4 sites and receive either 16 50-minute sessions of RM plus TAU or TAU alone within a 5-months period. Assessments will take place at baseline, at 5 months (post-intervention) and at 9 months (primary outcome).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
85

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Benjamin Franklin Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
      • Bremen, Germany, 28759
        • Jacobs University Bremen
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20146
        • Psychotherapeutische Hoschschulambulanz Universität Hamburg
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20251
        • Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
    • Sachsen
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, 04109
        • Universität Leipzig

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants will;

  1. have a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (ICD-10, F2, confirmed by SCID-5)
  2. patients will be reporting distressing AH for at least six months (to be beyond the startle and adjustment phase ) and score ≥ 3 on either item 8 or item 9 of the PSYRATS-AH;
  3. be ≥ 16 years of age
  4. be judged able to understand the full implications of their decision by the responsible psychiatrist or clinical psychologist.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participant must not:

  1. have AH with a clear organic cause (e.g. brain disease or injury):
  2. have exclusively hypnagogic or hypnopompic AH,
  3. have a primary diagnosis of acute substance dependence (F1x.2)
  4. have completed a course of CBT for psychotic symptoms during the past year within which distressing AH have been targeted
  5. be currently participating, or be confirmed to participate in another interventional study in which they are receiving an intervention which utilizes psychological therapy ;
  6. be non-German speaking to the degree that the participant is unable to fully understand and answer assessment questions or give informed consent;
  7. be at immediate and serious risk to self or other.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Relating module + Treatment as usual
Participants in this arm will receive 16 weekly sessions with Relating Therapy (RT) over 5 months in addition to their treatment as usual.
Behavioral: Relating Therapy
Relating Therapy (RT) is a symptom-specific behaviourally oriented intervention that targets interpersonal relating as a key mechanism associated with auditory hallucination distress. The aim is that patients learn to relate more assertively within the difficult relationships they have with both the auditory hallucinations and other people. The RT will follow a treatment manual consisting of three phases: 1. Socialization to relating therapy and its implications; 2. Exploration of themes within the relational history of the participant and their experience of relationships with AH, and interpersonal relating within the family and social environment (identifying any prominent themes, such as abuse, disempowerment, or rivalry); 3. Exploration and development of assertive approaches to relating to AH and other people.
Other: Treatment as usual
TAU will include medication management, supportive brief counselling sessions and various types of psychosocial (e.g. social work guided support, peer support) and monitoring provided by Mental Health Services, with individual and family psychological therapies offered occasionally. Individual therapies may include CBT or psychodynamic interventions. To amend for the heterogeneity of TAU across centres, the type and extent of any treatment received will be protocolled at T1 and T2.
Active Comparator: Treatment as usual
Treatment as usual will include medication management, supportive brief counselling sessions and various types of psychosocial (e.g. social work guided support, peer support) and monitoring provided by Mental Health Services, with individual and family psychological therapies offered occasionally. Individual therapies may include Cognitive Behavior Therapy or psychodynamic interventions.
Other: Treatment as usual
TAU will include medication management, supportive brief counselling sessions and various types of psychosocial (e.g. social work guided support, peer support) and monitoring provided by Mental Health Services, with individual and family psychological therapies offered occasionally. Individual therapies may include CBT or psychodynamic interventions. To amend for the heterogeneity of TAU across centres, the type and extent of any treatment received will be protocolled at T1 and T2.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales-AH-Distress factor score (PSYRATS-AH)
Time Frame: 9 months after baseline assessment
Auditory hallucination associated distress. The distress factor score of the PSYRATS-AH is the primary outcome as this is what has been prioritized by patients and is relevant to functioning. Confirmatory analysis will be conducted based on the intent-to-treat population (ITT), defined on the basis of the ITT principle. The aim is to show that the intervention group is superior to the control meaning that the mean score at 9 months adjusted for the baseline value is lower in the intervention group than in the control group. Lower scores indicate less distress.
9 months after baseline assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Budget Measure
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Time that ist spent in social and vocational activities
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
EuroQuol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Health-related quality of life
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Patients are interviewed about thoughts of wanting to complete suicide, active suicidal thoughts and intent to act on such thoughts (suicidal ideation, items 1-5) as well as about preparatory acts, aborted, interrupted or actual attempts (suicidal behaviour, 6-9). Completed suicide is rated on item 10. Scores on this scale range from 0 to 43 with higher scores indicating higher suicidal ideation
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Number of rehospitalizations
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Number of hospitalizations after study enrollment
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
he Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales - PSYRATS-AH-Frequency
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Frequency of auditory hallucinations. Ranges from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher frequency of auditory hallucinations
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Self-report scale measuring depressive symptoms. Total score ranges from 0 to 21with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Voice and You (VAY)
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
To analyse whether the putative intervention effect is explicable by the changes in the processes targeted (improved relating to AH), two self-report scales will measure relating to AH. The VAY is a 29-item measure of interrelating between the hearer and their predominant voice (see above for a description of the development of this measure). Relating is measured across four scales; two concerning the hearer's perception of the relating of the voice-voice dominance and voice intrusiveness; and two concerning the relating of the hearer-hearer distance and hearer dependence. Each item is measured on a four-point scale (0-3). Higher scores indicate more negative relating.
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Relating to Voices/Others Questionnaires (APPROVE)
Time Frame: 5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
The APPROVE consists of two separate scales: A 46-item measure of relating to voices (Approve-Voices); and a 46-item measure of social relating (Approve-Social). The items were preceded by an introductory text inviting participants to "please select the answer that best reflects your typical response to [voices/other people] on the scale 0 (disagree completely) to 10 (agree completely). Where the item is not relevant to you then please select the not applicable (N/A) option". The following instruction - "When [voices/other people] are being difficult (e.g., treating me badly), I respond by: (...)" is presented before the list of the items (e.g., "Hearing what they are saying but also stating my own views").
5 and 9 months after baseline assessment
Feasibility recruitment
Time Frame: through study completion, approximately two years after recruitment commenced
Will count the number of patients referred within each site, number of self-referrals within each site, number of referred patients within each site found to be eligible, number and proportion of consenting and eligible participants who attend 5-month and 9 month assessment within each site
through study completion, approximately two years after recruitment commenced
Feasibility completeness
Time Frame: through study completion, approximately 3 years after first participant has been randomized
Will count the number and proportion of consenting participants within the RM condition who reach the point of therapy 'exposure' (attended at least 8 of 16 therapy sessions), percentage of complete of data sets
through study completion, approximately 3 years after first participant has been randomized
Therapist adherence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 weeks after baseline assessment
All therapy sessions will be audio-recorded. For the first participant for each therapist, one recording from the early phase of therapy (sessions 1-6) and one recording from a later phase of therapy (sessions 7-14) will be randomly selected by the trial manager. The recordings will be translated, transcribed and sent to Dr Hayward for review. Therapist adherence to the treatment protocol will be assessed by Dr. Hayward who will assess two randomly selected recordings per therapist. Adherence will be rated using an adapted version of the Cognitive Therapy Scale for Psychosis (CTS-psy). Items F, G, and H have been adapted to include relating specific items in place of cognitive therapy (e.g. "Focus on the link between cognition and affect" was replaced with "focus on the effects of the patient engaging in different patterns of relating").
through study completion, an average of 4 weeks after baseline assessment
Safety monitoring
Time Frame: through study completion; 9 months after baseline assessment
Will count the number of adverse events and serious adverse events
through study completion; 9 months after baseline assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Hamburg-Eppendorf

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
University of Leipzig
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tania M Lincoln, Prof. Dr., Universität Hamburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 419676143

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

only upon request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders

Clinical Trials on Relating Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings