Preventive Treatment Of Latent Tuberculosis Infection In People With Diabetes Mellitus (PROTID)

March 27, 2023 updated by: Dr. Nyanda Elias Ntinginya

A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Prevention of Tuberculosis in People With Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases susceptibility to Tuberculosis (TB) and worsens TB patient outcomes. The number of patients with combined TB and DM now outnumbers that of combined TB and HIV and it has been estimated that 15-30% of TB disease may be attributable to diabetes globally. This may be expected to rise substantially as DM prevalence increases. Treatment of Latent TB Infection (LTBI) in this population will likely have a significant clinical benefit. Similar to HIV-infected individuals, those with DM might benefit from therapy to prevent the development of TB disease. Current international guidelines do not recommend LTBI management in people with DM, but this is because no studies have examined the risk-benefit ratio of such an intervention. To date, no RCTs have been conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of preventive treatment of LTBI in DM patients. Based on evidence on effectiveness, safety, and treatment completion rates, 3HP has been selected as the regimen of choice for this study of African people living with DM. People living with DM will be randomized to 3HP or placebo to determine the efficacy of 3HP in the prevention of TB disease in this population. PROTID's preventive treatment of LTBI among people with DM will generate the first solid evidence to support or refute the use of preventive treatment against TB in people with DM.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3000

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Enrolled in diabetes care with a history of DM and current use of anti-diabetic medication ('known DM'); OR in the absence of anti-diabetic medication an HbA1c of =6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or a fasting venous plasma glucose of =7.0 mmol (126 mg/dl). For those with no previously known DM a repeat test above the diagnostic cut-point is required to confirm the diagnosis ('new DM')
  2. Adult (18 years or older)
  3. Diagnosed with LTBI, defined as a positive IGRA test or TST reactivity =10 mm
  4. Voluntarily signed Informed Consent Form
  5. If sexually active, willing to use an effective contraceptive method for the duration of preventive therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Weight <45 kg
  2. Previous TB disease, defined as either bacteriologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed and treated
  3. Treatment with a rifamycin medication or isoniazid in the previous 2 years.
  4. Diagnosis of probable or definite TB during screening
  5. Confirmed HIV-infection or receiving antiretroviral treatment
  6. Liver dysfunction, defined as serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level 5 times the upper limit of normal
  7. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 3 months, or lactating
  8. Known allergy/sensitivity or any hypersensitivity to components of study drugs or their formulation
  9. Other conditions inapplicable for participation in this study, such as likely to fail to adhere to study commitment or to complete the whole study, at the discretion of the site investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Isoniazid and Rifapentine (INH-RPT)
Participants in intervention arm will receive an oral combination of rifapentine (RPT, 900 mg) and isoniazid (INH, 900 mg), once-weekly for 12 weeks.
Drug: Isoniazid and Rifapentine (INH-RPT)
Oral combination of rifapentine (RPT, 900 mg) and isoniazid (INH, 900 mg), once-weekly for 12 weeks.
Other Names:
  • 3HP
Placebo Comparator: Control
Participants in the control arm will receive placebo once weekly for 12 weeks.
Drug: Placebo
Participants in the control group will receive placebo once weekly for 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First diagnosis of TB
Time Frame: Through study completion, median of 33 months follow-up
The primary outcome will compare the rate of occurrence of TB disease (defined as definite or probable TB) in treatment and control groups. Definite TB disease will be confirmed by a culture or Xpert positive result for M. tuberculosis. Probable TB will be diagnosed according to an algorithm that takes into account symptoms, chest x-ray reading, sputum smear, histology and verbal autopsy results.
Through study completion, median of 33 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of possible, probable or definite TB disease
Time Frame: At least 24 months post randomisation
At least 24 months post randomisation
Occurrence of an adverse event
Time Frame: From randomisation to 60 days after end of study treatment
From randomisation to 60 days after end of study treatment
Treatment completion
Time Frame: Defined as > 11 of 12 doses of treatment over no more than 16 weeks.
Defined as > 11 of 12 doses of treatment over no more than 16 weeks.
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: At least 24 months post randomisation
At least 24 months post randomisation
Occurrence of possible, probable, or definite TB, or death
Time Frame: At least 24 months post randomisation
Occurrence of possible, probable, or definite TB, or death, noting that a proportion of deaths are likely to be due to TB but not possible to confirm through verbal autopsy and clinical notes review.
At least 24 months post randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dr. Nyanda Elias Ntinginya

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
King's College London
Makerere University
Stichting Katholieke Universiteit- Radboudumc (RUMC), Netherlands
Otago University, New Zealand
St George's, University of London, United Kingdom
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (KCMUCo), Tanzania
Uganda Martyrs Hospital Lubaga, Uganda

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NIMR-MB-002

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings