From Preserved, to Preservative-free Cyclosporine 0.1% Enhanced Triple Glaucoma Therapy

July 19, 2022 updated by: AGP Konstas, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Changing From Preserved, to Preservative-free Cyclosporine 0.1% Enhanced Triple Glaucoma Therapy: Impact on the Rate and Severity of Ocular Surface Disease

There is a lack of evidence on the impact of switching from a combined preserved anti-glaucoma regimen to a preservative-free (PF) one, while employing sufficiently robust OSD metrics. The investigators have therefore carried out a single center, prospective, crossover investigation to compare the 6-month effect of switching well controlled open-angle glaucoma patients with at least moderate glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease from preserved to triple preservative-free therapy with and without cyclosporine 0.1% dosed in the evening.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Halting and reversing glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease (GTR-OSD) will improve the success of long-term medical therapy, impacting millions of patients worldwide. Chronic medical therapy for glaucoma may be immensely benefitted by limiting disabling GTR-OSD, which would aid in the prevention of blindness. In 2015 a novel cationic formulation of cyclosporine A 0.1% was approved with once in the evening dosing in Europe. It is an effective, targeted immunomodulatory compound reducing inflammatory mediators and providing healing of the ocular epithelium. There remains however a paucity of published controlled evidence for GTR-OSD patients treated with this formulation. In addition, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of switching from a combined preserved anti-glaucoma regimen, to a preservative-free one, while employing sufficiently robust OSD metrics. The investigators have therefore carried out a single center prospective, crossover investigation to compare the 6-month effect of switching well controlled open-angle glaucoma patients with at least moderate GTR-OSD, from preserved to triple PF therapy with and without PF cyclosporine 0.1% dosed in the evening.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 55536
        • University Department of Ophthalmology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with well controlled open-angle glaucoma
  • Patients chronically treated for more than 6 months with preserved, branded, or generic, triple antiglaucoma therapy comprising latanoprost and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination
  • Subjects should have experienced at least 1 symptom of dry eye (soreness, scratchiness, dryness, grittiness, and burning)
  • Additionally, patients should demonstrate at least one of the objective signs for OSD at baseline: positive conjunctival staining with lissamine green and/or evidence of positive corneal staining with fluorescein (assessed with the 15-point Oxford scale),
  • Patients must show a BUT<8 seconds
  • On screening patients should show a Schirmer test without anesthesia (Schirmer-I test) ≥3 and ≤10 mm in 5 minutes.
  • When both eyes qualify the worse eye will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Best corrected visual acuity <1/10
  • Patients with severe dry eye disease or Sjogren's disease
  • Presence of eyelid abnormality, corneal disorder or abnormality, ocular surface metaplasia, filamentous keratitis, or corneal neovascularization
  • Patients who have undergone ocular surgery (of any type, including laser surgery), or ocular trauma within 4 months prior to screening
  • Subjects who had punctal occlusion, or diathermy within 3 months prior to screening or abnormality of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus.
  • Known allergy, or sensitivity to any of the study medications
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease, or history or active signs of ocular trauma, infection, inflammation, allergic disease, or herpes; corneal ulcers; recurrent erosions; or uveitis
  • Female patients will be excluded if they are pregnant, breastfeeding, planning a pregnancy, or are unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Triple preservative-free therapy with placebo in the evening
In this arm subjects will be randomized to topical therapy comprising preservative-free tafluprost drops dosed in the evening (20:30) and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination drops administered twice daily (8:00 and 20:00). Patients will use placebo (artificial tears) in the evening (21:00) for 6 months. At the end of this period patients will be crossed over to the other therapy (cyclosporine 0.1% in the evening)
Diagnostic test: Assessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale)
Corneal and conjunctiva staining will be recorded according to the Oxford grading scheme for ocular staining (0-15 score).
Drug: mean diurnal intraocular pressure-lowering
At the end of each 6-month period patients will undergo diurnal intraocular pressure assessment with both therapies.
Active Comparator: Triple preservative-free therapy with cyclosporine 0.1% in the evening
In this arm subjects will be randomized to topical therapy comprising preservative-free tafluprost drops dosed in the evening (20:30) and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination drops administered twice daily (8:00 and 20:00). Patients will use cyclosporine 0.1% drops in the evening (21:00) for 6 months. At the end of this period all patients will be crossed over to the other therapy (placebo in the evening)
Diagnostic test: Assessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale)
Corneal and conjunctiva staining will be recorded according to the Oxford grading scheme for ocular staining (0-15 score).
Drug: mean diurnal intraocular pressure-lowering
At the end of each 6-month period patients will undergo diurnal intraocular pressure assessment with both therapies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline in ocular staining (Oxford score)
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary efficacy endpoint for this crossover study will be the mean change from baseline in the total ocular staining score as determined by the 15-point Oxford scale of staining on the study eye.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean diurnal IOP
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean diurnal intraocular pressure with the two preservative-free therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.
6 months
Osmolarity
Time Frame: 6-months
Mean tear osmolarity with the two PF therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.
6-months
Matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) over-expression
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean MMP-9 over-expression with the two PF therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Andreas Katsanos, MD, PhD, University of Ioannina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 399

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Assessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings