Stellate Ganglion Block and Cerebral Vasospasm (BLOCK-CVS)

March 12, 2024 updated by: Ruquan Han, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Effect of Early Stellate Ganglion Block for Cerebral Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Randomized Controlled Trial (BLOCK-CVS)

At present, cerebral vasospasm (cVS) is the main cause of delayed cerebral infarction (DCI), which leads to high disability and mortality rate after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. As a consequence, the key of reducing DCI is to prevent cVS. But unfortunately, despite years of efforts, the prevention and treatment of cVS is still a major clinical dilemma and various ways of treatment are still being explored. Recent studies have shown that stellate ganglion block (SGB) can dilate cerebral vessels and alleviate the impact of existing cVS. However, there is no study to evaluate the effect of early application of SGB on the improvement and prevention of cVS after aSAH.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cerebral vasospasm refers to the extensive segmental or diffuse contraction of cerebral vasculature after aSAH, and cerebral blood flow is significantly reduced, which can lead to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) or delayed ischemic neurological dysfunction (DIND). Past studies have shown that if cerebral vasospasm occurs in patients with aSAH, the proportion of ischemic brain injury can be as high as 20%-30%.Obviously, prevention and treatment of CVS are the key to reducing the disability and mortality of aSAH.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
202

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100070
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ruquan Han, M.D., Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range: 18-65 years old;
  • Within 48 hours after onset of aSAH,and planning surgical treatment(aneurysm clipping);
  • Preoperative Hunt-Hess grade 2-3
  • Sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA > grade III;
  • Patients with posterior circulation aneurysm, ophthalmic aneurysms or internal carotid aneurysms;
  • patients with multiple aneurysms;
  • Patients with severe coagulation dysfunction;
  • Patients with trauma and local infection in the nerve block area;
  • Local anatomic structure changes (neck structure changes caused by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery);
  • MCA stenosis or infarction was found by preoperative imaging;
  • Patients with poor temporal window signal revealed by preoperative TCD (clear waveform image could not be obtained);
  • Allergy to known local anesthetics;
  • Pregnant and lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention group
In addition to routine anesthesia management and surgical operations, a stellate ganglion block was performed before induction of anesthesia, and then receive standard care after operation. Related statistical indicators were collected prospectively.
Procedure: Stellate ganglion block
After the patient entered the operating room, early SGB will be performed by a designated experienced anesthesiologist using the B-ultrasound visualization technique. The intervention site is the ipsilateral side of the planned craniotomy site. After routine disinfection, 0.5% ropivacaine 8-10 mL will be injected into the surface of the longus colli muscle on the medial side of the prevertebral fascia at the level of the C6 anterior tubercle, and then the puncture point will be covered with sterile dressings. The success criteria of e-SGB are Horner's syndrome, which is characterized by a miosis, ptosis, enophthalmos, conjunctival hyperemia and facial reddishness without sweating. For the "camouflaging" arm, the anesthesiologist only covered the corresponding part of the patient with sterile dressings to confuse the follow-up, without any puncture. All patients will be admitted to the ICU after the operation and then receive the standard of care.
No Intervention: Blank control group
In this study, a blank control was used. Routine anesthesia management and surgical operation were used without any special interventions(only an camouflaging action), and then receive standard care after operation. Only relevant statistical indicators were collected prospectively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm during hospitalization
Time Frame: an average of 2 weeks
Symptomatic vasospasm is defined as new focal or global neurological dysfunction or a decrease in the Glasgow coma score by more than 2 points, and with angiographic vasospasm on TCD or CTA.
an average of 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital.
Time Frame: on the 90 days
Days
on the 90 days
The modified Rankin scale at discharge, 30days, and 90 days
Time Frame: on the 30 and 90 days
The modified Rankin scale ≤2 is defined as good prognosis
on the 30 and 90 days
All-cause mortality rate up to 90 days.
Time Frame: on the 90 days
The rate
on the 90 days
The incidence of CTA vasospasm on the days 3-5 after operation
Time Frame: on the days 3-5 after operation
Compared with the preoperative baseline, the corresponding vessel diameter narrowed by more than 30% or new segmental stenosis occurred, not related to atherosclerosis or mechanical artery stenosis caused by arterial clamps or coils.
on the days 3-5 after operation
The incidence of hypoperfusion in CTP diagnosis on the days 3-5 after operation
Time Frame: on the days 3-5 after operation
The incidence of hypoperfusion in CTP diagnosis
on the days 3-5 after operation
The incidence of new cerebral infarction observed on the days 90 after operation and discharge .
Time Frame: on the days 90 after operation and discharge
New cerebral infarction is defined only as the appearance of new low-density infarct shadow on CT image compared with preoperation.
on the days 90 after operation and discharge
The incidence of TCD vasospasm during hospitalization
Time Frame: on the days 3-5 after operation
The mean blood flow velocity (MFV) of the middle cerebral artery ≥ 120 cm/s or Lindegaard index (ratio of MFV of the middle cerebral artery to the internal carotid artery) ≥ 3.
on the days 3-5 after operation
The changes of he mean blood flow velocity (mBFV) after operation
Time Frame: on the days 3-5 after operation
the changes in the mean blood flow velocity (mBFV) of all large intracranial anterior circulation vessels
on the days 3-5 after operation
Postoperative delirium incidence during hospitalization
Time Frame: on the days 1-3 after operation
The rate
on the days 1-3 after operation
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction
Time Frame: At discharge，an average of 2 weeks
The rate
At discharge，an average of 2 weeks
The proportion of remedial treatment after CVS
Time Frame: At discharge，an average of 2 weeks
The rate
At discharge，an average of 2 weeks
Adverse events during hospitalization
Time Frame: At discharge，an average of 2 weeks
Myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, infection, SGB related complications, etc
At discharge，an average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ruquan Han, M.D., Ph.D, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Z191100006619068

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings