Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation During Awake Endotracheal Intubation

November 28, 2022 updated by: SanQing Jin, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Comparison Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation When Combined With Midazolam and Remifentanil During Awake Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study

The purpose of this study is to compare the sedation effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol when they are both combined with midazolam and remifentanil during awake endotracheal intubation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Awake intubation is one of the best strategy guaranteed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines for the management of patients with anticipated difficult airways. Hemodynamic stability, optimal intubating conditions, patients' comfort, amnesia and preservation of patents' spontaneous respiration are critical for awake intubation. Sedation is one of the key elements for this technique. Intravenous midazolam, propofol, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are commonly used as sedatives during awake intubation. These agents are not preferred to be used alone but in combination with each other for the purpose of minimizing their respective side effects. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation during awake endotracheal intubation when they are both combined with midazolam and remifentanil.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
        • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-65 Years old;
  2. scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with oral tracheal intubation;
  3. The American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) grade is I or II, and the cardiac function is 1-2;
  4. Body mass index (BMI) 18-30 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients have severe cardiac diseases (cardiac function grading greater than grade 3/arrhythmia including sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrioventricular block, frequent ventricular premature, multiple ventricular premature, ventricular premature R on T, ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter/acute coronary syndrome) or respiratory failure or hepatic failure or renal failure;
  2. body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 or <18 kg/m2;
  3. Patients with poor blood pressure control (receive regular antihypertensive medical treatment but still have systolic blood pressure > 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg);
  4. Patients with a higher risk of reflux and aspiration, such as full stomach, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastroparesis, and pregnant women;
  5. Patients have schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, intellectual disability, hearing impairment.;
  6. Patients who take sedative and analgesic drugs for a long time;
  7. Patients who are allergic to propofol, dexmedetomidine, midazolam or remifentanil
  8. Patients who are expected to be difficult to intubate;
  9. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials, or who refuse to sign informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group DMR
dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Drug: dexmedetomidine combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Patients in this group will receive a bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously, and then a loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil and 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine over 5 min via separate syringe pumps.
Other Names:
  • dexmedetomidine-midazolam-remifentanil
Active Comparator: Group PMR
propofol combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Drug: propofol combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Patients in this group will receive a bolus of midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously, and then a loading dose of 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil and 0.33 mg/kg propoful over 5 min via separate syringe pumps.
Other Names:
  • propofol-midazolam-remifentanil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
blood pressure
Time Frame: During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min
systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean blood pressure (MBP) shown in the monitor.
During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intubation condition score
Time Frame: During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min
Assessment of the intubation condition according to the scale of the modified Erhan's intubation condition score which includes jaw relaxation, laryngoscopy, vocal cord position, and patient's response (coughing, limb movement) to intubation and inflation of the intubation tube cuff.
During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
degree of coughing
Time Frame: During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min.
Grade assessment of coughing during the peri-intubation period (1 = No cough and limb activity, 2 = Intermittent cough with slight activity of chest and abdomen, 3 = Continuous cough with large amplitude activity of chest and abdomen, no limb activity, 4 = Continuous cough with large amplitude activity of chest and abdomen and limbs)
During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min.
heart rate
Time Frame: During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min.
Heart rate shown in the monitor
During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min.
pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Time Frame: During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min.
SpO2 shown in the monitor
During the procedure of general anesthesia induction, expected an average of 20 min.
level of recall
Time Frame: postoperative follow-up visit 24 hours after the operation, expected an average of 5 min.
At the 24-h postoperative follow-up visit, patients will be interviewed to assess their recall of pre-anesthesia events, administration of topical anesthesia, endoscopy and intubation.
postoperative follow-up visit 24 hours after the operation, expected an average of 5 min.
satisfaction score
Time Frame: postoperative follow-up visit 24 hours after the operation, expected an average of 5 min.
At the 24-h postoperative follow-up visit, patients will be interviewed to assess their satisfaction about the procedure of awake intubation (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor).
postoperative follow-up visit 24 hours after the operation, expected an average of 5 min.
adverse events
Time Frame: postoperative follow-up visit 24 hours after the operation, expected an average of 5 min.
At the 24-h postoperative follow-up visit, patients will be interviewed to assess the adverse events related to endotracheal intubation (postoperative hoarseness or sore throat)
postoperative follow-up visit 24 hours after the operation, expected an average of 5 min.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E2020154

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings