Warfarin Patient Self-management Implementation in the US Healthcare System

May 6, 2024 updated by: Daniel Witt, University of Utah

Overcoming Barriers to Warfarin Patient Self-management Implementation in the US Healthcare System

In the US, patients receiving warfarin therapy are rarely allowed to engage in patient self-management (PSM) which is less burdensome, less expensive, and safer than standard clinic-directed warfarin management. The long-term objective of our application is to improve the safety of ambulatory warfarin therapy through increasing the implementation of PSM.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the US, patients receiving warfarin therapy are rarely allowed to engage in patient self-management (PSM) which is less burdensome, less expensive, and safer than standard clinician-directed warfarin management. National and international evidence-based guideline panels strongly recommend PSM over other warfarin management methods for appropriate patients because it improves INR control, cuts risk of thrombosis and death by half without increasing bleeding risk, and increases patient satisfaction and quality of life. The reasons behind PSM underutilization in US settings have not been systematically assessed and validated. We will address this knowledge gap and provide foundational information for increasing PSM utilization within the US healthcare system. Our Aim 1 will assess and validate barriers and facilitators to PSM and evaluate their applicability to the US healthcare system; Aim 2 will develop and test PSM implementation strategies in US ambulatory care sites using rapid-cycle research methodology; and Aim 3 will assess implementation (feasibility, fidelity, adoption), clinical (effectiveness, safety, equity, patient-centeredness), and end-user (satisfaction) outcomes. The long-term objective of our application is to improve the safety of ambulatory warfarin therapy through increasing the implementation of PSM. Our research proposal is guided by an implementation science logic model that incorporates well-known implementation science frameworks to support the specific aims. Qualitative data collection and analysis for Aim 1 will be organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) a determinant framework that identifies five domains influencing implementation: Intervention, Inner Setting, Outer Setting, Individuals, and the Implementation Process. Constructs within each domain provide guidance on factors to identify and measure as potential implementation barriers or facilitators. PSM implementation activities in Aim 2 will be guided by the Quality Implementation Framework (QIF), which identifies the critical implementation process steps and specific actions related to these steps that can be utilized to achieve quality PSM implementation. Implementation strategies will be supported by the rapid-cycle research framework developed by the AHRQ Practice Based Research Network. Implementation outcomes in Aim 3 will be structured using the well-known Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. We will utilize a type III hybrid research design to test PSM implementation strategies while observing/gathering information on PSM-related clinical and economic outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92357
        • Recruiting
        • VA Loma Linda Healthcare System
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Completed
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Completed
        • University of Michigan
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age treated with warfarin for any indication for at least 9 months prior to enrollment
  • Demonstrate the willingness and ability to test their own INR using a home INR monitoring device or have same-day access to clinic-derived INR results (e.g., via electronic medical record secure messaging)
  • Willing to make independent decisions about warfarin dosing based on INR results
  • Able to perform INR tests at least every 2 weeks
  • Currently have and willing to maintain internet access for the duration of the study in order to complete online data collection forms
  • Have an anticipated duration of warfarin therapy of at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Goal INR range other than 2.0-3.0 or 2.5-3.5
  • Known poor adherence to warfarin therapy
  • Non-English speaking
  • Inability or refusal to provide written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Warfarin Patient Self-Management
Patients managing decisions relating to warfarin dose and next INR test based on the results of current INR test
Other: Patient self-management
Patient makes independent decisions regarding warfarin therapy changes using warfarin dosing tools
Active Comparator: Historical Control
Patients managed by anticoagulation providers prior to transitioning to warfarin patient self-management
Other: Usual care provided by anticoagulation providers
Normal care provided by anticoagulation providers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time in therapeutic INR range (TTR)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Percent time INR in the therapeutic range
Change from baseline at 6 months
Percent of patients transitioned to patient self-management
Time Frame: 6-months follow up
Percent of patients successfully transitioned to warfarin patient self-management
6-months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Episodes of major bleeding
Time Frame: 6-months follow up
Episodes of bleeding meeting ISTH definition for major bleeding
6-months follow up
Episodes of thromboembolic complications
Time Frame: 6-months follow
Objectively diagnosed stroke, venous thrombosis, systemic embolism
6-months follow
Mental and physical health-related quality of life scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Mental and physical domains of quality of life as measured by the SF-12 survey
Change from baseline at 6 months
Anticoagulation therapy knowledge scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Scores measured by the Anticoagulation Knowledge Survey Tool
Change from baseline at 6 months
Patient satisfaction survey scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Patient satisfaction as measured by the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale
Change from baseline at 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient self-management cost effectiveness
Time Frame: 3-month cycles
Cohort simulation Markov model compared to usual care
3-month cycles

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Utah

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Michigan
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
VA Loma Linda Health Care System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB_00141141

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings