Warfarin Patient Self-management Implementation in the US Healthcare System

March 29, 2023 updated by: Daniel Witt, University of Utah

Overcoming Barriers to Warfarin Patient Self-management Implementation in the US Healthcare System

In the US, patients receiving warfarin therapy are rarely allowed to engage in patient self-management (PSM) which is less burdensome, less expensive, and safer than standard clinic-directed warfarin management. The long-term objective of our application is to improve the safety of ambulatory warfarin therapy through increasing the implementation of PSM.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the US, patients receiving warfarin therapy are rarely allowed to engage in patient self-management (PSM) which is less burdensome, less expensive, and safer than standard clinician-directed warfarin management. National and international evidence-based guideline panels strongly recommend PSM over other warfarin management methods for appropriate patients because it improves INR control, cuts risk of thrombosis and death by half without increasing bleeding risk, and increases patient satisfaction and quality of life. The reasons behind PSM underutilization in US settings have not been systematically assessed and validated. We will address this knowledge gap and provide foundational information for increasing PSM utilization within the US healthcare system. Our Aim 1 will assess and validate barriers and facilitators to PSM and evaluate their applicability to the US healthcare system; Aim 2 will develop and test PSM implementation strategies in US ambulatory care sites using rapid-cycle research methodology; and Aim 3 will assess implementation (feasibility, fidelity, adoption), clinical (effectiveness, safety, equity, patient-centeredness), and end-user (satisfaction) outcomes. The long-term objective of our application is to improve the safety of ambulatory warfarin therapy through increasing the implementation of PSM. Our research proposal is guided by an implementation science logic model that incorporates well-known implementation science frameworks to support the specific aims. Qualitative data collection and analysis for Aim 1 will be organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) a determinant framework that identifies five domains influencing implementation: Intervention, Inner Setting, Outer Setting, Individuals, and the Implementation Process. Constructs within each domain provide guidance on factors to identify and measure as potential implementation barriers or facilitators. PSM implementation activities in Aim 2 will be guided by the Quality Implementation Framework (QIF), which identifies the critical implementation process steps and specific actions related to these steps that can be utilized to achieve quality PSM implementation. Implementation strategies will be supported by the rapid-cycle research framework developed by the AHRQ Practice Based Research Network. Implementation outcomes in Aim 3 will be structured using the well-known Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. We will utilize a type III hybrid research design to test PSM implementation strategies while observing/gathering information on PSM-related clinical and economic outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92357
        • Not yet recruiting
        • VA Loma Linda Healthcare System
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age treated with warfarin for any indication for at least 9 months prior to enrollment
  • Demonstrate the willingness and ability to test their own INR using a home INR monitoring device or have same-day access to clinic-derived INR results (e.g., via electronic medical record secure messaging)
  • Willing to make independent decisions about warfarin dosing based on INR results
  • Able to perform INR tests at least every 2 weeks
  • Currently have and willing to maintain internet access for the duration of the study in order to complete online data collection forms
  • Have an anticipated duration of warfarin therapy of at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Goal INR range other than 2.0-3.0 or 2.5-3.5
  • Known poor adherence to warfarin therapy
  • Non-English speaking
  • Inability or refusal to provide written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Warfarin Patient Self-Management
Patients managing decisions relating to warfarin dose and next INR test based on the results of current INR test
Patient makes independent decisions regarding warfarin therapy changes using warfarin dosing tools
Active Comparator: Historical Control
Patients managed by anticoagulation providers prior to transitioning to warfarin patient self-management
Normal care provided by anticoagulation providers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time in therapeutic INR range (TTR)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Percent time INR in the therapeutic range
Change from baseline at 6 months
Percent of patients transitioned to patient self-management
Time Frame: 6-months follow up
Percent of patients successfully transitioned to warfarin patient self-management
6-months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Episodes of major bleeding
Time Frame: 6-months follow up
Episodes of bleeding meeting ISTH definition for major bleeding
6-months follow up
Episodes of thromboembolic complications
Time Frame: 6-months follow
Objectively diagnosed stroke, venous thrombosis, systemic embolism
6-months follow
Mental and physical health-related quality of life scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Mental and physical domains of quality of life as measured by the SF-12 survey
Change from baseline at 6 months
Anticoagulation therapy knowledge scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Scores measured by the Anticoagulation Knowledge Survey Tool
Change from baseline at 6 months
Patient satisfaction survey scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months
Patient satisfaction as measured by the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale
Change from baseline at 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient self-management cost effectiveness
Time Frame: 3-month cycles
Cohort simulation Markov model compared to usual care
3-month cycles

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Patient self-management

3
Subscribe