Preoperative Abdominal Enhanced CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Gastric Cancer
Preoperative Abdominal Enhanced CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT to Detect Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in High-Risk Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Single-Center, Comparative Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Chang-ming Huang, MD
- Phone Number: +86-13805069676
- Email: hcmlr2002@163.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Zu-Kai Wang, MD
- Phone Number: +86-15659036263
- Email: 413966027@qq.com
Study Locations
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Gastric Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age from 18 to 75 years
- Primary gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary, tubular, mucinous, signet ring cell, or poorly differentiated) confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
- The clinical tumor stage before PET/CT scan was evaluated as cT4/N+/M0-1, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition
- Performance status of 0 or 1 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale (ECOG)
- American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) class I, II, or III
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Severe mental disorder
- History of previous abdominal inflammatory diseases (such as peritonitis, pancreatitis, cholecystitis, inflammatory bowel disease)
- History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months
- History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months
- History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month
- Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer
- Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)<50% of predicted values
- History of allergy to tracer agents of PET/CT
- History of allergy to contrast agents of CT
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scan after abdominal enhanced CT
After the patient received abdominal enhanced CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT were further performed.
The interval between 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was 2 days to 1 week.
|
Each subject receives a single intravenous injection of 68Ga-FAPI, and undergo PET/CT imaging after 18F-FDG PET/CT scan during 2 days and 1 week.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic efficacy for peritoneal carcinomatosis
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for peritoneal carcinomatosis in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and abdominal enhanced CT
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax (for PET/CT only)] for peritoneal carcinomatosis
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for peritoneal carcinomatosis in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT
|
One month after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Predictive value for peritoneal carcinomatosis by using radiomic algorithm
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Prediction value of three kinds of imaging examination for peritoneal carcinomatosis by using radiomic algorithm
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Diagnostic efficacy for primary lesions
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for primary lesions in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and abdominal enhanced CT
|
One month after surgery
|
|
SUVmax (for PET/CT only) for primary lesions
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for primary lesions in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Diagnostic efficacy for metastatic lymph nodes
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for metastatic lymph nodes in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and abdominal enhanced CT
|
One month after surgery
|
|
SUVmax (for PET/CT only) for metastatic lymph nodes
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for metastatic lymph nodes in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Correlation between the expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and 68Ga-FAPI uptake in different pathological types of peritoneal carcinomatosis
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Analyzing the correlation between the SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI in peritoneal carcinomatosis with different pathological types and FAP identified by pathological examinations
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Correlation between the expression of FAP and 68Ga-FAPI uptake in different pathological types of primary lesions
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Analyzing the correlation between the SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI in primary lesions with different pathological types and FAP identified by pathological examinations
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Correlation between the expression of FAP and 68Ga-FAPI uptake in different pathological types of metastatic lymph nodes
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Analyzing the correlation between the SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI in metastatic lymph nodes with different pathological types and FAP identified by pathological examinations
|
One month after surgery
|
|
Predictive value of conversion therapy efficacy
Time Frame: One month after surgery
|
Predictive value of three kinds of imaging examination for gastric cancer in conversion therapy response assessment
|
One month after surgery
|
|
1-year progression-free survival rate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The relationship between three kinds of imaging examination and the patient's 1-year progression-free survival rate
|
12 months
|
|
1-year progression patterns
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The relationship between the three types of imaging examinations and the patient's 1-year progression patterns
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Chang-Ming Huang, MD, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrell MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014 Jun;8(5-6):454-63. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300095. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
- Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, Adeberg S, Rathke H, Rohrich M, Winter H, Plinkert PK, Marme F, Lang M, Kauczor HU, Jager D, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Giesel FL. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019 Jun;60(6):801-805. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227967. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
- Pang Y, Zhao L, Luo Z, Hao B, Wu H, Lin Q, Sun L, Chen H. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG Uptake in Gastric, Duodenal, and Colorectal Cancers. Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):393-402. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020203275. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
- Chen H, Pang Y, Wu J, Zhao L, Hao B, Wu J, Wei J, Wu S, Zhao L, Luo Z, Lin X, Xie C, Sun L, Lin Q, Wu H. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F] FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jul;47(8):1820-1832. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04769-z. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
- Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020 Aug 29;396(10251):635-648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5.
- Roukos DH. Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer management. Cancer Treat Rev. 2000 Aug;26(4):243-55. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0164.
- Burbidge S, Mahady K, Naik K. The role of CT and staging laparoscopy in the staging of gastric cancer. Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar;68(3):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
- Nakagawa S, Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H. Role of staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2007;10(1):29-34. doi: 10.1007/s10120-006-0406-3. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
- Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, D'Amico TA, Das P, Denlinger C, Fakih MG, Fuchs CS, Gerdes H, Glasgow RE, Hayman JA, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Keswani RN, Kleinberg LR, Korn WM, Lockhart AC, Meredith K, Mulcahy MF, Orringer MB, Posey JA, Sasson AR, Scott WJ, Strong VE, Varghese TK Jr, Warren G, Washington MK, Willett C, Wright CD, McMillian NR, Sundar H; National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 May 1;11(5):531-46. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0070.
- Smyth E, Schoder H, Strong VE, Capanu M, Kelsen DP, Coit DG, Shah MA. A prospective evaluation of the utility of 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging locally advanced gastric cancer. Cancer. 2012 Nov 15;118(22):5481-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27550. Epub 2012 May 1.
- Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ. Cell surface glycoprotein of reactive stromal fibroblasts as a potential antibody target in human epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(18):7235-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7235.
- Rettig WJ, Su SL, Fortunato SR, Scanlan MJ, Raj BK, Garin-Chesa P, Healey JH, Old LJ. Fibroblast activation protein: purification, epitope mapping and induction by growth factors. Int J Cancer. 1994 Aug 1;58(3):385-92. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910580314.
- Kim JH, Jang YJ, Park SS, Park SH, Kim SJ, Mok YJ, Kim CS. Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for T4 gastric cancers. Asian J Surg. 2009 Oct;32(4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60395-X.
- Kurita N, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, Iwata T, Nishioka M, Yoshikawa K, Miyatani T, Higashijima J, Nakao T. Predictive factors of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010 Jul-Aug;57(101):980-3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Peritoneal Diseases
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Stomach Diseases
- Abdominal Neoplasms
- Stomach Neoplasms
- Carcinoma
- Peritoneal Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FUGES-021
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.