Assessing the PrEP Care Cascade Among Black Men and Transwomen in the Southeastern US

August 17, 2026 updated by: Lisa Eaton, University of Connecticut

PrEP Connected Study

The proposed research aims to assess the multiple forms and paths of stigma and substance use as they relate to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use for HIV prevention. How stigma and an evolving public health landscape impact PrEP use among Black sexual minorit men who use substances is unknown. The current application focuses on addressing critical and novel questions to improving the essential building blocks of biomedical prevention approaches by providing crucial information for enhancing interventions to lower HIV prevalence among substance using Black sexual minority men.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

HIV incidence among Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in the southeastern United States is one of the highest in the world. Our research team has conducted studies with BMSM in Atlanta that have demonstrated 35% HIV prevalence and over 5% annual HIV incidence. Although PrEP is highly effective for preventing HIV transmission, it is not reaching BMSM. The failures in our ability to engage BMSM in PrEP use are highly problematic given the alarming rates of HIV transmission among this group. Of particular concern is the impact of substance use as a barrier in PrEP linkage, uptake, adherence, and persistence. Substance use is common among BMSM in our study, with 43% (n=204/474) reporting recent substance use. Further complicating PrEP use is the potential impact of COVID-19 on health care access, health care infrastructure, and sex behavior. The need to better understand PrEP use in the context of our new health care landscape is critical to making advances in PrEP use. At this point, assessing how substance use impacts PrEP use is challenging because PrEP implementation is so low among this group. The current study aims to provide substance using BMSM with evidence-based PrEP engagement counseling to address barriers to accessing PrEP (not for intervention testing, but for facilitating PrEP use) and to assess the multiple forms and paths of stigma and substance use as they relate to PrEP linkage, uptake, adherence, and persistence. The investigators propose using the HIV Stigma Framework as a conceptual model for investigating the intersecting pathways of stigma drivers and stigma mechanisms as they relate to PrEP use among substance using BMSM. Aim 1: Enroll a prospective cohort of N=500 BMSM who test HIV negative and test substance use positive on toxicology testing, and provide evidence-based PrEP engagement counseling to facilitate access to PrEP care. Aim 2: Conduct psychosocial and health care access assessments every 2-months for 18-months, and conduct HIV/STI testing and dried blood spot testing for TFV-DP every 3-months for 18-months. Aim 3: Using data collected from Aims 1 and 2, model stigma pathways of advancing and reverting along the PrEP cascade (i.e., linkage, uptake, adherence, persistence), with these pathways mediated by health care access and moderated by substance use. Achieving the aims will provide critical insight for translating and adapting interventions to enhance potency and durability for individuals at exceedingly elevated risk for HIV.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
        • SHARE Project

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men (based on male sex assignment at birth)
  • Age 18 or older
  • Identify as Black, African-American, Afro-Brazilian, Afro-Carribean, or African diaspora,
  • Report condomless anal sex with man in past six months
  • Test HIV negative
  • Report recent (<3 months) substance use
  • Positive drug toxicology for substance use

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Stigma Counseling for PrEP Access
Behavioral counseling
Behavioral: Stigma counseling for PrEP use
This counseling consists of a single-session (45 minute) delivered by trained peer counselors. The primary aims and relevant content areas for counseling are: (1) Assessing and discussing factors known to be drivers of emotional barriers to accessing health care. This counseling aim has two main sub-components: (a) participants will be asked about their prior experiences with accessing health care and their concerns regarding future access, and (b) the counseling will focus on creating personal agency around needing to prioritize one's health. (2) Evaluating concerns around discussing PrEP with health care providers. The counseling combines motivational interviewing with medical decisional balance, which focuses on points to consider when evaluating PrEP. (3) Promoting resiliency beliefs and positive adaptation. For this objective the counselor works with the participant to establish PrEP use goals and problem-solving strategies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PrEP Use
Time Frame: 12 months
TFV-DP (Tenofovir Diphosphate) biological testing for PrEP pill taking will be assessed. TFV-DP measured at >700 fmol will be interpreted as having taken ≥4 doses/week, and TFV-DP measured at >700 fmol over two consecutive time points will be interpreted as persistence to taking PrEP. The lower scale limit is 0 and upper scale limit is approximately around 2500. Higher values indicate greater medication adherence to PrEP pills.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PrEP stigma
Time Frame: 12 months
Questionnaire to assess stigma related psychosocial variables will be used to assess secondary outcomes. This questionnaire is based measures provided in the HIV Stigma Framework for assessing HIV related stigma (i.e., prejudice, stereotypes, discrimination, enacted stigma, anticipated stigma, and internalized stigma). Responses to the scale items range from 1=strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree, with higher scores indicating a higher number of experiences of stigma.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Connecticut

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lisa A Eaton, PhD, University of Connecticut

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 4, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 4, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H20-0117

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings