Magnetic Randomized Trial in Elderly Depressed (MrTED)

September 23, 2025 updated by: Leandro Valiengo, University of Sao Paulo

Treatment of Depression in the Elderly With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Using Theta-burst Stimulation (TBS): Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Clinical Trial

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition, mostly treated with antidepressant drugs, which are limited for issues such as refractoriness, adverse effects and drug interactions, especially in the elderly population. In this context, the investigators investigate a non-pharmacological treatment known as recurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with the theta-burst stimulation (TBS) method for the treatment of geriatric depression. This treatment modality has almost no adverse effects and avoids the risk associated with polypharmacy, providing an interesting alternative to antidepressant treatments. Our aim is to evaluate TBS efficacy in the treatment of geriatric depression in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Recurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a consolidated procedure for the treatment of depression, with several meta-analyzes demonstrating its efficacy. The theta-burst stimulation (TBS) method is a modification of the usual rTMS protocol. As a new protocol, there are still few studies evaluating its efficacy in treatment of major depression, although a recently published meta-analysis has pointed to benefits of this therapeutic modality. To date, there are no studies published with this method for the treatment of geriatric depression. This study will be a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of theta-burst rTMS in the treatment of major depressive disorder in the elderly, randomizing 108 subjects to the experimental (TBS) and comparative (sham) groups. The coil will be positioned in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with intermittent TBS (iTBS, stimulatory) mode on the left and continuous TBS (cTBS, inhibitory) on the right. Stimulation protocol consists of 1800 pulses on each brain hemisphere, totaling a ten minutes session. There will be 20 consecutive sessions, one a day, except on weekends and holidays. The cycle of continuous intervention will last approximately four weeks, after which applications with the same technique will be performed at the end of weeks 6, 8 and 12. Clinical outcome measures will be obtained on eight occasions: treatment baseline, and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks of onset. The main clinical outcome will be measured using the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS), comparing baseline scores with those obtained after 6 weeks of treatment. As secondary endpoints, we will use the Global Clinical Impression Scale (CGI), the CIRS (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the intermediate scores obtained on the HDRS scale, the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and variations in serum BDNF concentrations; all these evaluation tools have validated versions in Portuguese. As tolerability and safety parameters, the incidence of adverse events and the occurrence of manic/hypomanic symptoms will be evaluated by the Young Mania Scale (YMRS). TBS stimulation will be evaluated in terms of safety, tolerability and effectiveness for the treatment of major depression in the elderly, possibly becoming another therapeutic option useful for patients with poor response or contraindications to the use of antidepressants.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
108

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
        • University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major Depressive Disorder;
  • Patients older than 60 years
  • Hamilton equal or higher than 17

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other mental disorders (alcohol or drug addiction, psychotic disorders, dementia, bipolar disorder);
  • Presence of serious neurological or clinical diseases;
  • Resence of severe suicidal ideation and CIRS (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale) score> 7, characterizing a set of clinical morbidities that could impair adherence to the research protocol, bipolar disorder and/or presence of manic symptoms (hypo) demonstrated with more than 8 points in the Young Mania Rating Scale.
  • Metal implants;
  • Epilepsy or electronics in the cephalic segment;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Active Stimulation
Active Comparator: Active stimulation with pulses emitted according to intervention description
Device: Transcranial magnetic stimulation
The coil will be positioned in the prefrontal dorsolateral cortex, with intermintent TBS (TBSi) mode on the left and continuous TBS (TBSc) on the right. 1800 pulses will be used on each side, totaling 10 minutes of total duration. There will be 20 consecutive sessions, one per day, except on weekends and holidays, totaling around 4 weeks. A day of stimulation with the same technique will be done in the 6th week, 8th week and 12th week.
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation
Sham Comparator: The blinding will be done with a sham coil, which consists of a coil that reproduces the sound that the true coil does, but without generating the magnetic field.
Device: Transcranial magnetic stimulation
The coil will be positioned in the prefrontal dorsolateral cortex, with intermintent TBS (TBSi) mode on the left and continuous TBS (TBSc) on the right. 1800 pulses will be used on each side, totaling 10 minutes of total duration. There will be 20 consecutive sessions, one per day, except on weekends and holidays, totaling around 4 weeks. A day of stimulation with the same technique will be done in the 6th week, 8th week and 12th week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 items (HDRS-17)
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and 6
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 0 and 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HDRS-17
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale (CGI)
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Change in Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS)
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Change in serum BDNF concentrations
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and 6
Continuous measure (score changes).
Weeks 0 and 6
Response HDRS 17
Time Frame: Week 12
Response (≥50% improvement from week 0 to 12)
Week 12
Remission of HDRS 17
Time Frame: Week 12
Remission (HDRS-17 ≤ 8)
Week 12
Young Manic Rating Scale (YMRS)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Serious adverse events include treatment-emergent hypomania/mania (YMRS>8), suicide, psychiatric hospitalization and others life-threatening or incapacitant events
Weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: Up to week 12
Serious adverse events include treatment-emergent hypomania/mania (YMRS>8), suicide, psychiatric hospitalization and others life-threatening or incapacitant events
Up to week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conditioned pain modulation
Time Frame: Week 0 and 4
Temperature of the thermode reported as painful
Week 0 and 4
Actigraphy
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment up to 4 weeks after finishing study
Continuous measure (score changes).
1 week before treatment up to 4 weeks after finishing study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Sao Paulo

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Leandro Valiengo, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2.643.551

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings