Cyanoacrylate Use in Free Gingival Graft
The Effects of Cyanoacrylate on Self-reported Outcomes and Healing Following Free Gingival Graft Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34010
- Biruni University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Single-tooth gingival recession in the anterior mandibular region
- Pain with chewing or oral hygiene practice
- Ongoing recession
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic disease
- Smoking
- Pregnancy / lactation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cyanoacrylate
The graft is stabilized and the donor site is coated with cyanoacrylate.
|
1.5-2 x 5 x 10 mm size epithelialized graft harvested from the palate is stabilized in the mandibular anterior single-tooth recession region
N-Butyl-Cyanoacryle is applied to stabilize the graft to the recipient bed and to coat the donor site wound
|
|
Active Comparator: Suture
6/0 polyvinylidene fluoride sutures are used for stabilization, while the donor site is left untreated.
|
1.5-2 x 5 x 10 mm size epithelialized graft harvested from the palate is stabilized in the mandibular anterior single-tooth recession region
The graft is stabilized with 6/0 polyvinylidene fluoride suture to the recipient bed
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Re-epithelization
Time Frame: one week after the surgery
|
Donor site re-epithelization: hydrogen-peroxide is applied to the donor area with the help of an injector, and it is recorded as complete when no foaming occurs
|
one week after the surgery
|
|
Re-epithelization
Time Frame: two weeks after the surgery
|
Donor site re-epithelization: hydrogen-peroxide is applied to the donor area with the help of an injector, and it is recorded as complete when no foaming occurs
|
two weeks after the surgery
|
|
Re-epithelization
Time Frame: three weeks after the surgery
|
Donor site re-epithelization: hydrogen-peroxide is applied to the donor area with the help of an injector, and it is recorded as complete when no foaming occurs
|
three weeks after the surgery
|
|
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 1st week
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10), self-reported outcome 0 - no pain (min.) 10 - unbearable (max.)
|
1st week
|
|
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 2nd week
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10), self-reported outcome 0 - no pain (min.) 10 - unbearable (max.)
|
2nd week
|
|
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 3rd week
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10), self-reported outcome 0 - no pain (min.) 10 - unbearable (max.)
|
3rd week
|
|
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 4th week
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10), self-reported outcome 0 - no pain (min.) 10 - unbearable (max.)
|
4th week
|
|
Oral health impact profile (OHIP-14)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The patients are asked to fill provided OHIP-14 forms Questionnaire about satisfaction related to oral health, scored as 0-4 (never - always) 14 questions in total 0 (min.) - 56 (max.)
Lower scores represent higher oral health related life quality
|
Baseline
|
|
Oral health impact profile (OHIP-14)
Time Frame: 3rd day
|
The patients are asked to fill provided OHIP-14 forms Questionnaire about satisfaction related to oral health, scored as 0-4 (never - always) 14 questions in total 0 (min.) - 56 (max.)
Lower scores represent higher oral health related life quality
|
3rd day
|
|
Oral health impact profile (OHIP-14)
Time Frame: 1st week
|
The patients are asked to fill provided OHIP-14 forms Questionnaire about satisfaction related to oral health, scored as 0-4 (never - always) 14 questions in total 0 (min.) - 56 (max.)
Lower scores represent higher oral health related life quality
|
1st week
|
|
Oral health impact profile (OHIP-14)
Time Frame: 1st month
|
The patients are asked to fill provided OHIP-14 forms Questionnaire about satisfaction related to oral health, scored as 0-4 (never - always) 14 questions in total 0 (min.) - 56 (max.)
Lower scores represent higher oral health related life quality
|
1st month
|
|
Graft dimensions
Time Frame: 1st month
|
Mesio-distal (horizontal) and apico-coronal (vertical) width of the graft is measured with a periodontal probe, rounding to the nearest mm
|
1st month
|
|
Graft dimensions
Time Frame: 3rd month
|
Mesio-distal (horizontal) and apico-coronal (vertical) width of the graft is measured with a periodontal probe, rounding to the nearest mm
|
3rd month
|
|
Graft dimensions
Time Frame: 6th month
|
Mesio-distal (horizontal) and apico-coronal (vertical) width of the graft is measured with a periodontal probe, rounding to the nearest mm
|
6th month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mucosal thickness
Time Frame: In the beginning of the surgery (baseline)
|
15 endodontic reamer is inserted to the palatal mucosa 5 mm apical of the gingival margin of the second premolar; under local anesthesia
|
In the beginning of the surgery (baseline)
|
|
Paresthesia / hyperesthesia in the donor site
Time Frame: 1st month
|
The patient marks the visual analogue scale (0-10) after rubbing the donor site with a periodontal probe (to give a reference, symmetrical area is rubbed first) 0 - Paresthesia / hyperesthesia, 10 - no sensation difference with the reference area
|
1st month
|
|
Color harmony
Time Frame: 1st week
|
Color harmony between the graft and the neighboring keratinized tissue at the recipient site, examiner gives a score ranging 0-10 0 - completely different tone/color of the graft; 10 - no detectible tone difference
|
1st week
|
|
Color harmony
Time Frame: 2nd week
|
Color harmony between the graft and the neighboring keratinized tissue at the recipient site, examiner gives a score ranging 0-10 0 - completely different tone/color of the graft; 10 - no detectible tone difference
|
2nd week
|
|
Color harmony
Time Frame: 1st month
|
Color harmony between the graft and the neighboring keratinized tissue at the recipient site, examiner gives a score ranging 0-10 0 - completely different tone/color of the graft; 10 - no detectible tone difference
|
1st month
|
|
Color harmony
Time Frame: 3rd month
|
Color harmony between the graft and the neighboring keratinized tissue at the recipient site, examiner gives a score ranging 0-10 0 - completely different tone/color of the graft; 10 - no detectible tone difference
|
3rd month
|
|
Color harmony
Time Frame: 6th month
|
Color harmony between the graft and the neighboring keratinized tissue at the recipient site, examiner gives a score ranging 0-10 0 - completely different tone/color of the graft; 10 - no detectible tone difference
|
6th month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mustafa YILMAZ, PhD, Biruni University, assistant professor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CAFGG
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.