Cartilage Repair Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffold With Bone Marrow Aspirate Compared With Microfracture for Focal Articular Cartilage Damage of the Hip (CHASE)

November 19, 2024 updated by: McMaster University

Cartilage Repair Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffold With Bone Marrow Aspirate Compared With Microfracture for Focal Articular Cartilage Damage of the Hip: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a hip disorder resulting from a mismatch of the hip joint, resulting in hip pain and can potentially cause osteoarthritis. As the head of the femur (ball of the hip) and the acetabulum (socket of the hip) impinge or rub together with this mismatch, patients can suffer damage to their articular cartilage which covers both. Currently, the standard of care to surgically treat articular cartilage damage is a procedure called 'microfracture' - where the surgeon makes multiple holes in the bone under the defects causing bone marrow cells and blood from the holes to combine to form a "super clot" that covers the damaged area and is meant to be the basis for new tissue formation or 'fibrocartilage'. However, native articular cartilage is made of hyaline, rather than fibrocartilage, which is a more flexible and durable tissue able to withstand a great deal of force on the hip when it moves. Therefore, a more recently developed strategy that has gained popularity for use in the repair of articular cartilage in the knee involves the implantation of bone marrow aspirate (BMA) along with a scaffold made of hyaluronic acid (HA) in a single-step procedure, with the goal of promoting new hyaline-like tissue. While this has shown promising results in treating knee cartilage damage, this treatment method has yet to be studied in the hip. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate in patients with painful articular cartilage damage of the hip, the effect of implantation of an HA scaffold along with BMA in comparison to microfracture on hip pain and function, cartilage regeneration, and any complications at 24 months post-surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 36 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female patients aged 18-40 years
  2. Hip pain lasting 6 months or more with no relief from documented non-operative modalities
  3. Cam, Pincer, or Mixed FAI
  4. Focal articular cartilage defects of the acetabulum on MRI, confirmed to be full thickness (International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) grade 3 or 4) during arthroscopic examination
  5. Focal acetabular articular cartilage lesions measuring between 1x1 cm2 and 5x5 cm2 on MRI and confirmed on arthroscopic examination
  6. Patient agrees to participate in the study-specific postoperative rehabilitation protocol
  7. Patient can speak, read, and understand the language of the site
  8. Patient has provided informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cartilage defects of the femoral head
  2. Previous surgery on the study hip
  3. Traumatic chondral injury of the hip from a single event
  4. Presence of advanced osteoarthritis (Tonnis grade 2 or 3)
  5. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to hyaluronate
  6. Evidence of hip dysplasia (i.e. lateral centre edge angle < 20˚)
  7. Evidence of acetabular over coverage such as coxa profunda or coxa protrusion
  8. Immunosuppressive or anti-proliferative medication use
  9. Chronic pain syndromes
  10. Significant medical co-morbidities (requiring assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs))
  11. History of paediatric hip disease
  12. Uncontrolled diabetes
  13. Contraindications to MRI imaging (e.g. claustrophobia)
  14. Patient is involved in ongoing legal or workplace claims
  15. Patient is incarcerated
  16. Patient who will likely have problems, in the judgement of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: HA-based scaffold with BMA (Hyalofast®; Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA, USA)
Those allocated to the scaffold treatment group will have 30 ml of BMA harvested from the ipsilateral iliac crest under fluoroscopic guidance. The hip arthroscopy will then be resumed, and the damaged cartilage lesion will be debrided using a mechanical shaver to remove loose and calcified tissue. Once the walls of the lesion are confirmed to be stable with a probe, the exact size of the defect will be measured for templating of the scaffold. The biodegradable HA-based scaffold (Hyalofast®; Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA, USA) will be prepared by cutting it to fit the focal defect. Once the cartilage lesion is dried manually, this scaffold will be implanted into the defect after it has been soaked in the BMA. The scaffold will then be secured to the defect in a press-fit fashion to the surrounding cartilage. In the case where additional fixation of the scaffold is needed, such as uncontained shoulder of cartilage, fibrin glue will be used to secure the scaffold.
Device: HA-based scaffold with BMA (Hyalofast®; Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA, USA)
General surgical and anaesthetic risks apply to the subjects included in the trial. Microfracture and BMA are surgical techniques currently being used and are approved for use in Canada. The HA-scaffold that will be used in this trial (Hyalofast®, Anika Therapeutics Inc.) has European CE Mark for use in all joints. We will obtain a Health Canada approval to use the Hyalofast® product in the hip for this trial.
Active Comparator: Microfracture
As per current standard of care for focal articular cartilage lesions of the acetabulum, the unstable cartilage will be debrided and removed from the subchondral bone using a mechanical shaver until a stable margin is obtained. A ring curette will be used to remove the calcified cartilage layer and create a border of healthy cartilage tissue that can support the marrow clot. Through the mid-anterior portal, specialized 90˚ awls will then be placed with the tip perpendicular to the subchondral bone of the acetabulum, and a mallet will be used to penetrate the subchondral bone with perforations 3 mm deep to access the bone marrow elements. This is done until the defect is homogeneously covered with micro-perforations 2-3 mm apart.
Device: HA-based scaffold with BMA (Hyalofast®; Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA, USA)
General surgical and anaesthetic risks apply to the subjects included in the trial. Microfracture and BMA are surgical techniques currently being used and are approved for use in Canada. The HA-scaffold that will be used in this trial (Hyalofast®, Anika Therapeutics Inc.) has European CE Mark for use in all joints. We will obtain a Health Canada approval to use the Hyalofast® product in the hip for this trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33)
Time Frame: 24 months
The iHOT-33 is designed to measure hip-specific health-related quality of life changes after treatment of active young patients with hip disorders. The questionnaire has been validated in this patient population and has demonstrated efficacy, reliability, and responsiveness to change.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (100-point scale) (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 months
The VAS is one of the most frequently used pain rating scales in clinical practice and research. The VAS is a validated unidimensional scale that is easy to use, requires no verbal or reading skills, and is sufficiently versatile to be employed in a variety of settings.
24 months
Euro-Qol 5-D (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 24 months
The EQ-5D is a standardized, utility-based instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It comprises 5 questions on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression. The EQ-5D has been used in previous studies involving patients with hip pain and has been extensively validated.
24 months
Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART)
Time Frame: 24 months
The MOCART scale has been validated to demonstrate the extent of cartilage restoration following surgical repair, examining factors such as "degree of defect repair and filling of the defect", and "integration to border zone". The MOCART scale is applied to MRIs.
24 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months
Reported complications such as infection, additional or revision surgery, hypersensitivity or allergic reactions, reduced range of motion, and any other adverse events.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 19, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHASE01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings