Efficacy of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Injections Patients With Concomitant Pes Anserine Bursitis

May 11, 2021 updated by: Mustafa Fatih YAŞAR, Abant Izzet Baysal University

Comparison of the Efficacy of Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Injections Combined With Conventional Physiotherapy in Patients With Concomitant Pes Anserine Bursitis and Knee Osteoarthritis:

To evaluate the efficiencies of local corticosteroid injections and local anesthetics in patients with concomitant pes anserine bursitis and osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Several treatment options have been tried with varying success rates, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy modalities, cold application with ice-packs, and injection of local anesthetics and/or corticosteroids. Despite a relatively high frequency of this painful condition, surprisingly, few studies have evaluated treatment strategies in randomized controlled study design. To the best of our knowledge, no study in the literature made a comparison of the efficacy of local anesthetic and corticosteroid injections in addition to physiotherapy in the treatment of pes anserine bursitis yet. Thus, we aimed to compare the treatment efficacies of physiotherapy alone, physiotherapy + local anesthetic injection, and physiotherapy + local corticosteroid injection in a randomized controlled study design in patients with concomitant osteoarthritis and pes anserine bursitis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Merkez
      • Bolu, Merkez, Turkey, 14100
        • Abant Izzet Baysal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having stage II-IV knee osteoarthritis along with pes anserine bursitis
  • Symptom onset for more than three months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent knee operations
  • had an inflammatory rheumatic disease
  • had a history of knee trauma
  • had a meniscus tear
  • valgus/varus deformity
  • received injection treatment to pes anserine bursa during the preceding year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group I
34 patients who were diagnosed with concomitant knee osteoarthritis and pes anserine bursitis and met inclusion criteria were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: having stage II-IV knee osteoarthritis along with pes anserine bursitis, duration of symptoms for more than three months, and age between 20 and 70 years. Primary knee osteoarthritis was diagnosed as per American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and graded via Kellgren-Lawrence radiological classification included in this study.
Drug: Lidocaine injection
Lidocaine injection were applied to the most tender point in the pes anserine region by means of the soft tissue infiltration technique only once at the commencement of the treatment period. All injections were performed by the same physician.
Other Names:
  • Jetokain, Edaka İlaç AŞ, Turkey
Active Comparator: Group II
34 patients who were diagnosed with concomitant knee osteoarthritis and pes anserine bursitis and met inclusion criteria were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: having stage II-IV knee osteoarthritis along with pes anserine bursitis, duration of symptoms for more than three months, and age between 20 and 70 years. Primary knee osteoarthritis was diagnosed as per (ACR) criteria and graded via Kellgren-Lawrence radiological classification included in this study.
Drug: Corticosteroid injection
Corticosteroid injection were applied to the most tender point in the pes anserine region by means of the soft tissue infiltration technique only once at the commencement of the treatment period. All injections were performed by the same physician.
Other Names:
  • Diprospan, Merck Sharp Dohme Inc., USA
Other: Group III
34 patients who were diagnosed with concomitant knee osteoarthritis and pes anserine bursitis and met inclusion criteria were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: having stage II-IV knee osteoarthritis along with pes anserine bursitis, duration of symptoms for more than three months, and age between 20 and 70 years. Primary knee osteoarthritis was diagnosed as per (ACR) criteria and graded via Kellgren-Lawrence radiological classification included in this study.
Other: Conventional Physical therapy
The study participants underwent a physiotherapy program that included a one-time 15-minute cold therapy using ice packs and closed-kinetic chain quadriceps strengthening program as follows; isometric quadriceps exercise, isokinetic concentric, and eccentric quadriceps exercises with heel slides and squads. These exercises were repeated ten times a day, seven days per week, for eight weeks in total

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: eight weeks
We used paper-based VAS to evaluate the baseline severity and changes in the intensity of pain by different interventions in the entire study cohort. The visual analogue scale was devised by Hayes and Patterson and is used to document pain rating. Subjects self-report the intensity of their pain by placing a handwritten mark at one point of the length of a ten-centimeter line. The two ends of the scale line represent "no pain" and "worst pain experienced" at the zero cm and 10th cm of the scale, respectively.
eight weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: eight weeks
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a self-administered questionnaire comprising 24 items in three different domains. The index measure pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability. Pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability subscales comprise five, two, and seventeen questions, respectively. All subscales consist of 5 answer choices, which range from zero, "not present," to four, "very severe."
eight weeks
3-meter walk test
Time Frame: eight weeks
We used 3MWT to evaluate the walking speed of the study participants. In this test, the individual is instructed to stand up while they are sitting on a chair with arm support. And then, the person is asked to walk as much distance as possible in 3 minutes without running. The walking time is measured in seconds and recorded, and the walking speed is evaluated for the corresponding age group.
eight weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Abant Izzet Baysal University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 11, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AIBU-FTR-MFY-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings