Low-field Thoracic Magnetic Stimulation Increases Peripheral Oxygen Saturation Levels in COVID-19 Patients

March 14, 2022 updated by: Elias Manjarrez

Low-field Thoracic Magnetic Stimulation Increases Peripheral Oxygen Saturation Levels in Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Patients: a Single-blind, Sham-controlled, Crossover Study

This study aimed to present a proof-of-concept that a 30 minutes single-session of low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS) on the dorsal thorax can be employed to increase oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) participants significantly. The investigators (Saul M. Dominguez-Nicolas and Elias Manjarrez) hypothesized that the variables associated with LF-ThMS, as hyperthermia, frequency, and magnetic flux density in the dorsal thorax, might be correlated to SpO2 levels in these participants. The investigators designed a single-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study on COVID-19 participants who underwent two sessions of the study (real and sham LF-ThMS), and other COVID-19 participants who underwent only the real LF-ThMS.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (CoV)-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may cause low SpO2 and respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients. Hence the increase of SpO2 levels could be crucial for the quality of life and recovery of these patients. In this clinical trial, the investigators (Saul M. Dominguez-Nicolas and Elias Manjarrez) propose that an electromagnetic device termed low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS) system could be employed for 30 minutes to increase SpO2 levels in COVID-19 participants. This device non-invasively delivers a pulsed magnetic field from 100 to 118 Hz and 10.5 to 13.1 milliTesla (mT) (i.e., 105 to 131 Gauss) to the dorsal thorax. In line with preliminary studies, the scientific literature, and other devices currently used in musculoskeletal magnetic therapy, these frequencies and magnetic flux densities are safe for the participants. The investigators designed a single-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study on COVID-19 participants who underwent two sessions of the study (real and sham LF-ThMS) and other participants who underwent only the real LF-ThMS. The study design includes a 30 minutes single-session of LF-ThMS to avoid confounding factors related to the spontaneous recovery by natural immunity, common in many COVID-19 patients several days after the contagion. Here the LF-ThMS protocol is not intended to demonstrate its use as therapy but is instead designed to examine the following physiological hypothesis. The hypothesis that there is a statistically significant correlation between magnetic flux density, frequency, or temperature associated with the real LF-ThMS and SpO2 levels in COVID-19 participants. In this context, the present clinical trial is relevant because it could motivate future randomized clinical trials to examine whether the LF-ThMS could be helpful as a potential therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Mexico
      • Puebla, Mexico, 72570
        • Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult participants diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease without pneumonia.
  • COVID-19 participants with a SpO2 level less or equal to 90 %, exhibiting difficulty breathing, but not intubated.
  • COVID-19 participants with similar pharmacological treatment against COVID-19.
  • 20-85 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure requiring urgent intubation
  • COVID-19 patients with impaired consciousness
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patients with metallic implants in the thorax, abdomen, or arms, or with electronic medical devices such as pacemakers
  • Children

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Real Low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS)
Crossover, single-blind session of low field thoracic magnetic stimulation (real LF-ThMS)
Device: Low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS)
A 30 minutes session of low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS) is planned for each participant.
Sham Comparator: Sham Low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS)
In the same patients the coils are positioned in the same coordinates for sham exposure, but the pulse generator is not turned on. Subjects are blinded for the real LF-ThMS or sham stimulation conditions.
Device: Low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS)
A 30 minutes session of low-field thoracic magnetic stimulation (LF-ThMS) is planned for each participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Change from Baseline Peripheral Oxygen Saturation levels (SpO2) during the intervention
Time Frame: 30 minutes
1. Change from Baseline Peripheral Oxygen Saturation levels (SpO2) at 30 minutes of LF-ThMS intervention.
30 minutes
2. Peripheral Oxygen Saturation levels (SpO2) after the intervention
Time Frame: 6 months
2. To evaluate the safety of the intervention, SpO2 levels also are evaluated up to 6 months after the 30 minutes single session of LF-ThMS intervention.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Magnetic hyperthermia
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Coils temperature on the dorsal thorax is measured every 5 minutes during a 30 minutes LF-ThMS session (sham and real).
30 minutes
2. Frequency of the pulsed magnetic stimulation
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The frequency of the pulsed LF-ThMS on the dorsal thorax is measured every 5 minutes during a 30 minutes LF-ThMS session (sham and real).
30 minutes
3. Magnetic flux density of the pulsed magnetic stimulation
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The magnetic flux density of the pulsed LF-ThMS on the dorsal thorax is measured every 5 minutes during a 30 minutes LF-ThMS session (sham and real).
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Elias Manjarrez

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Elias Manjarrez, PhD, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
  • Principal Investigator: Saul M Dominguez-Nicolas, PhD, Universidad Veracruzana

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 3, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Registration number: 818

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators (Saul M. Dominguez-Nicolas and Elias Manjarrez) plan to make individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

open access

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings