Effects of Adding Different Drugs for Preventing Cough Induced by Bronchoscopic Spraying of Local Anesthetics

November 16, 2025 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Effects of Adding Intravenous Lidocaine, Alfentanil Before Bronchoscopic Insertion for Preventing Cough During Bronchoscopic Spraying of Local Anesthetics in Non-intubated Bronchoscoopic Interventions

Cough is the most unwanted response during bronchoscopic interventions for hemodynamic instability, hypoxemia, and interruption of interventions. Topical lidocaine is recommended with a grade evidence in British Thoracic Society guideline. However, severe cough often induces during the initial bronchoscopic spraying of local anesthesia, follows with uneven spraying, spasm or arrythmias. In previous reports, there were many drugs and techniques investigated for preventing cough during broncoscopic spraying. As bronchoscopic interventions need more space and stability of airways to precisely operate on, few studies have focused on the effects of different drugs for preventing cough. In this study, Different intravenous drugs (lidocaine, alfentanil, compared to normal saline) is planned to be injected one minutes before bronchoscopic insertion, the responses to bronchoscopicly spraying local anestheticsuch as cough intensity, BIS levels, ANI, Transdermal O2 and CO2, respiration were recorded and analyzed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cough is the most unwanted response during bronchoscopic interventions. Cough could lead to airway spasm, hemodynamic instability, desaturation, hypoventilation, and then interrupt the following interventions. In previous reports, lodicaine and other drugs given intravenously, inhalationally or trans-cricoidally have been investigated for preventing cough during conventional broncoscopic examinations. As bronchoscopic interventions were goaled to precise localization and operations with higher yield rate. Steady airways without endotracheal tubes are usually required. Topical lidocaine is recommended with a grade evidence in British Thoracic Society guideline. However, severe cough often induces during the initial bronchoscopic spraying of local anesthesia, follows with uneven spraying, spasm or arrythmias. There are few studies focused on the effects of different drugs for preventing cough even bronchoscopic spary of local anesthetics has become the routine pratice before interventions. In this study, different intravenous drugs (lidocaine, alfentanil, compared to normal saline) are planned to be injected one minutes before bronchoscopic insertion, the responses to bronchoscopic spraying local anesthetic were recorded and analyzed. Besdies cough scores, the following changes are recorded and compared: (1) status on visualization and the responses to spraying of vocal cords, (2) anesthetic depth (BIS levels), ANI scores (3) blood pressure and heart beats, (4) data of hemoglobin saturation (SPO2) and Transdermal O2 and CO2. We goaled to compare the effects of intravenous lidocaine and etomidate on cough intensity, hemodynamics, ventilation, and bronchoscopic withdrawl rate during bronchoscopic interventions with intravenous anethesia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
108

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • National Taiwan University Cancer Center Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients planned to receive bronchoscopic interventions for lung tumors with intravenous anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • conventional bronchoscopy without interventions such as EBUS, tracheal tumore excision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: normal saline
intravenous normal saline 5 mL 1 minute before bronchoscope insertion
Procedure: bronchoscopic insertion
After intravenous anesthesia is stabilized with BIS levels between 50-70, Intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, or alfentanil 10 ug/kg, or 5 mL normal saline will be injected. Bronchoscopic insertion will be started 1 minute later. After seeing the vocal cords, local spraying of 2% will be initiated from vocal cords, trachea, and bilateral bronchial trees.
Other Names:
  • bronchoscopic spraying of 2% lidocaine
Active Comparator: lidocaine
intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg 1 minute before bronchoscope insertion
Procedure: bronchoscopic insertion
After intravenous anesthesia is stabilized with BIS levels between 50-70, Intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, or alfentanil 10 ug/kg, or 5 mL normal saline will be injected. Bronchoscopic insertion will be started 1 minute later. After seeing the vocal cords, local spraying of 2% will be initiated from vocal cords, trachea, and bilateral bronchial trees.
Other Names:
  • bronchoscopic spraying of 2% lidocaine
Experimental: alfentanil
intravenous alfentanil 10 ug/kg 1 minute before bronchoscope insertion
Procedure: bronchoscopic insertion
After intravenous anesthesia is stabilized with BIS levels between 50-70, Intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, or alfentanil 10 ug/kg, or 5 mL normal saline will be injected. Bronchoscopic insertion will be started 1 minute later. After seeing the vocal cords, local spraying of 2% will be initiated from vocal cords, trachea, and bilateral bronchial trees.
Other Names:
  • bronchoscopic spraying of 2% lidocaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cough score
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic spray local anesthetics on vocal cords to the end of spraying on bonchial trees
cough severity x times Cough severity was graded on a 5-point scale: minimal cough, 1 point; moderate cough, 2 points; severe cough, 3 points; bouts of coughing, 4 points; and series of bouts of coughing, 5 points.
from bronchoscopic spray local anesthetics on vocal cords to the end of spraying on bonchial trees
BIS levels from EEG monitor
Time Frame: from 1 minutes before bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after bronchoscopic interventions
the changes of BIS levels (0-100)
from 1 minutes before bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after bronchoscopic interventions
ANI scores from analgesia-nociception monitor (0-100)
Time Frame: from 1 minutes before bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after bronchoscopic interventions
the changes of ANI scores (0-100)
from 1 minutes before bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after bronchoscopic interventions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MAP
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
mean arterial pressure, mmHg
from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
heart rate
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
heart rate, beats/ minute
from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
SPO2
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
SPO2, %
from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
Transdermal CO2
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
Transdermal CO2, mmHg
from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
BTransdermal O2
Time Frame: from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying
Transdermal O2, mmHg
from bronchoscopic insertion to 20 minutes after completion of local anesthetic spraying

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Taiwan University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Yajung Cheng, National Taiwan University Hospital, Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 16, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 202107071MIND

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings