Temporomandibular Joint and COVID-19

October 13, 2021 updated by: Nazife Begüm KARAN, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital

Temporomandibular Joint Complains in Patients With COVID-19

There is evidence that CV-19 is associated with joint symptoms, but there are no specific data on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). It is also known that the systemic health status can impact the immune system. Given all this, this study aimed to investigate the effect of CV-19 and systemic health status, as determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System 12, on TMJ in patients with TMJ complaints using the DC/TMD scale.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study investigates the effect of systemic status, according to American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA), and COVID-19 on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) scale, shown to be valid for assessing TMJ disorders. The study included 76 patients who presented to our clinic with TMJ. Participants were divided into two groups: those with COVID-19 (CV-19, study group) and those without (non-CV-19, control group). These two groups were both further divided into subgroups according to ASA 1 and ASA 2 classification. Power analyses were performed using G*Power software to determine the required number of patients. Groups were compared using the Symptom Questionnaire, a demographics survey, the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), and the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20) of the DC/TMD. The statistical software program version 1.6.23 was used for statistical analysis. Although joint complaints were more common in ASA 2 patients with CV-19, the groups were not significantly different. The CV-19 ASA 2 group had the highest JFLS-20 score (mean: 1.3±1.5) and the non-CV-19 ASA 1 group had the lowest JFLS-20 score (mean: 0.7±0.8), but the differences were again not significant. Joint complaints were more common and more severe in ASA 2 patients with CV-19, albeit not with statistical significance. More studies are needed to better understand our results.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Eyalet/Yerleşke
      • Ri̇ze, Eyalet/Yerleşke, Turkey, 053100
        • Nazife Begüm Karan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who live in Rize/Turkey

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • applied to our clinic with TMJ discomfort
  • ASA 1 and ASA 2 patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with acute CV-19
  • Patients who are not in ASA 1 or ASA 2 classification
  • Patients under 18 year-old
  • Pregnants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Study Group
Patients with CV-19 and not in the acute period. This group were then divided into two subgroups each according to ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) classification (ASA 1 and ASA 2).
Other: Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) scale

4 items of the DC/TMD scale were used in this study to evaluate the TMJ disorders.

  1. Demographics Survey
  2. DC/TMD Symptom Questionnaire (SQ)
  3. Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS)
  4. Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20)
Control Group
Patients without CV-19 This group were then divided into two subgroups each according to ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) classification (ASA 1 and ASA 2).
Other: Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) scale

4 items of the DC/TMD scale were used in this study to evaluate the TMJ disorders.

  1. Demographics Survey
  2. DC/TMD Symptom Questionnaire (SQ)
  3. Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS)
  4. Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DC/TMD scale - Demographics Survey
Time Frame: through study completion an average of 3 months
This survey consisted of 6 items concerning marital status, socioeconomic status, profession, education, and children.
through study completion an average of 3 months
DC/TMD scale - DC/TMD Symptom Questionnaire
Time Frame: through study completion an average of 3 months
This 14-item questionnaire aims to determine the duration and causes of pain and the associated symptoms.
through study completion an average of 3 months
DC/TMD scale - Graded Chronic Pain Scale
Time Frame: through study completion an average of 3 months
This 8-item scale is graded on a scale of 0-10 points. It includes 3 questions on pain intensity, 4 questions on function, and 1 question on the number of days with facial pain. The GCPS consists of two subscales. As the first subscale, Characteristic Pain Intensity is measured, where a score of ≥50 out of 100 possible points indicates high-intensity pain. The Interference Score is then calculated as the second subscale based on scores concerning interference in daily activities and work and the number of days with interference
through study completion an average of 3 months
DC/TMD scale - Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20
Time Frame: through study completion an average of 3 months
This scale consists of three subscales that address limitations of mastication, vertical mobility, and verbal and non-verbal communication. These three subscales are ideal for both research purposes and patient assessment of various functional limitations of the jaw. It is a global scale that consists of 20 items and the three aforementioned subscales (mastication, vertical mobility, and verbal and non-verbal communication)
through study completion an average of 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASA 1
Time Frame: through study completion an average of 3 months
American Society of Anesthesiologist 1 - systemically healthy patients
through study completion an average of 3 months
ASA 2
Time Frame: through study completion an average of 3 months
American Society of Anesthesiologist 2 - A patient with mild systemic disease
through study completion an average of 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nazife B Karan, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020/224

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data that support the other findings in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings