Once Weekly Infant Corticosteroid Trial for DMD

August 12, 2026 updated by: Anne M. Connolly

Phase-2 Trial of 5mg/kg/Week Prednisolone in Young Boys With DMD

The hypothesis tested here is that a lower dose of intermittent oral corticosteroids (5mg/kg/week) will be equally effective to the 10mg/kg/week dose.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators know that the muscle destruction from Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) begins in infancy and we previously demonstrated that motor decline in infancy compared to typically developing infants reflects that destruction. Because of the known side effects of daily corticosteroids, most physicians do not begin treatment until age 3-5 years. Most side effects (Cushingoid faces, linear growth arrest, and bone density loss) did not happen in infants and in ambulatory boys in two separate studies. However, in infants and young boys taking (10mg/kg/week), 56% of infants and young boys did have an increase in weight percentile compared to baseline. This study will test this lower dose of prednisolone (5mg/kg/week) in an unblinded study in infants and young DMD boys (ages 1 through 30 months) to determine if equal efficacy can be achieved with fewer side effects. The primary outcome for this study will be gross motor function. The study team will enroll boys from age 1 month through 30 months and follow each for two years. We will assess gross motor function using three outcome measures: the Bayley-4 Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-4) and the newly developed Neuromuscular Gross Motor Outcomes (GRO) and the NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA). The one-year outcome will be the change in the Bayley-4 Scaled Score and the two-year outcome will be the change in the GRO score. This study will determine if a lower dose is equally effective and if that dose may lessen the weight gain seen in about half of the infants in the first study. Both the Bayley-4 and the GRO allow assessment of gross motor function and are feasible in all boys with DMD under the age of 42 months. In addition, the GRO allows continued assessment of motor function across a wide age span which will allow this cohort to be followed for two full years.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220
        • Recruiting
        • University of Cincinnati
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Recruiting
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anne Connolly, MD
        • Contact:
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects ages 1 month through 30 months
  • Weakness consistent with Duchenne on exam, creatine kinase ≥ 20 times the upper limit of normal, and genetic mutation known to be causative for DMD.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with Glucocorticosteroids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental
This is a one-arm study and the group of subjects are all experimental and will receive drug.
Drug: Prednisolone
Liquid, 5mg/kg per week, for one year
Other Names:
  • Corticosteroid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change from baseline to 24 months for the Gross Motor Scaled Score.
Time Frame: Baseline visit to 24 month visit
Neuromuscular Gross Motor Outcome (GRO): The Neuromuscular GRO is a gross motor outcome measure developed to assess whole body strength, motor development, and function for all levels of ability across the lifespan in those diagnosed with neuromuscular disease. Items are administered following the developmental sequence, as appropriate for age and ability. Maximum score is 100 points.
Baseline visit to 24 month visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Language (expressive and receptive), Social and Fine Motor skills at 24 months as assessed by the Bayley-4 Scales of Infant and Toddler Development
Time Frame: Baseline visit to 24 month visit
The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-4) are recognized internationally as a comprehensive tool to assess children from as young as 15 days old. With Bayley-4, it is possible to obtain detailed information from non-verbal children as to their functioning. Children are assessed in the five key developmental domains of cognition, language (receptive and expressive), & motor (fine and gross).
Baseline visit to 24 month visit
Linear growth
Time Frame: Baseline visit to 24 month visit
We have previously shown that all infants and young children treated with 10mg/kg/week did maintain their linear growth. This protocol is designed to determine also if the lower dose will still maintain benefit.
Baseline visit to 24 month visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Anne M. Connolly

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
University of Texas
Virginia Commonwealth University
Muscular Dystrophy Association

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anne Connolly, MD, Nationwide Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Infant Steroid Phase II

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings