Physiotherapy in Post COVID-19 Syndrome Patients

November 24, 2023 updated by: Marie Carmen Valenza, Universidad de Granada

Cognitive Behavioral Principles-based Treatment Program for Patients With Post COVID-19 Syndrome

Patients who have undergone COVID-19 infection often have long-term sequelae. One of the most prevalent sequelae is pain. The main objective of this research is to investigate the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program in fear avoidance beliefs, disability, pain catastrophizing and pain interference.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
54

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD
  • Phone Number: 958 248035
  • Email: cvalenza@ugr.es

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Granada
      • Granada., Granada, Spain, 18071
        • Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of both sexes.
  • Agreed to participate.
  • Post COVID-19 patients meeting the WHO definition for this disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological or orthopaedic pathologies that limited voluntary movement.
  • Cognitive impairment that prevented them from understanding and answering the questionnaires.
  • Patients suffering from a reinfection with SARS-CoV-2.
  • Patients who had been hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection.
  • Patients who had pre-existing chronic pain according to the current IASP definition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control group
Other: Control intervention
Patients received an informational brochure in a consultation with a health professional. The brochure explained the importance of physical activity to improve the health condition of these patients. Patients had the opportunity to ask any questions to the healthcare professional.
Experimental: Cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program group
Other: Cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program
The treatment protocol had a total duration of 6 weeks. Two sessions were conducted each week, the first being a group session lasting 1.5 hours and the second an individual session lasting 45 minutes. During the group sessions, emotional disclosure and sharing of the experiences of patients with post COVID-19 syndrome were encouraged. During the individual sessions, a strong relationship was developed between the patient and the healthcare professional, with the healthcare professional helping the patient develop self-efficacy, thought monitoring, helpful self-talk, and reflection on changes in activity levels throughout the program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fear-avoidance belief changes
Time Frame: Baseline
Fear avoidance beliefs will be assessed by the the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). It consists of 16 sentences related to physical activity (first 5 items) and work (last 11 items).
Baseline
Fear-avoidance belief changes
Time Frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Fear avoidance beliefs will be assessed by the the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). It consists of 16 sentences related to physical activity (first 5 items) and work (last 11 items).
At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in functionality
Time Frame: Baseline
Changes in functionality were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores.
Baseline
Changes in functionality
Time Frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in functionality were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores.
At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: Baseline
Changes in pain catastrophizing were assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale. It consists of a 13-item scale with values from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the greater the pain catastrophization.
Baseline
Changes in pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in pain catastrophizing were assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale. It consists of a 13-item scale with values from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the greater the pain catastrophization.
At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in pain interference
Time Frame: Baseline
In the PROMIS PI, item category responses range from 1 to 5. T scores had a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 points. Low scores on the PROMIS PI represent less interference of pain with physical function, whereas high scores represent greater interference with physical function.
Baseline
Changes in pain interference
Time Frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
In the PROMIS PI, item category responses range from 1 to 5. T scores had a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 points. Low scores on the PROMIS PI represent less interference of pain with physical function, whereas high scores represent greater interference with physical function.
At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain.
Time Frame: Baseline
The Short Form McGuill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a version of the original McGuill Pain Questionnaire, discovered by Melzak in 1987. This scale is divided into several parts. The first part consists of a list of 15 adjectives, including 11 sensory and 4 affective descriptors of pain (e.g., terrible, throbbing, etc.) on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), giving an overall score ranging from 0 to 45, as well as two scores from 0 to 33 for the sensory subscale and 0 to 12 for the affective subscale. In addition, it includes a VAS scale that assesses the patient's pain in the last week. Finally, it includes a Present Pain Intensity Scale (PPI). The PPI is based on a single item measuring overall pain intensity. Patients are asked about their current level of pain on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (unbearable). This scale has been shown to have excellent psychometric properties.
Baseline
Changes in the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain.
Time Frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
The Short Form McGuill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a version of the original McGuill Pain Questionnaire, discovered by Melzak in 1987. This scale is divided into several parts. The first part consists of a list of 15 adjectives, including 11 sensory and 4 affective descriptors of pain (e.g., terrible, throbbing, etc.) on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), giving an overall score ranging from 0 to 45, as well as two scores from 0 to 33 for the sensory subscale and 0 to 12 for the affective subscale. In addition, it includes a VAS scale that assesses the patient's pain in the last week. Finally, it includes a Present Pain Intensity Scale (PPI). The PPI is based on a single item measuring overall pain intensity. Patients are asked about their current level of pain on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (unbearable). This scale has been shown to have excellent psychometric properties.
At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad de Granada

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD, Universidad de Granada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DF0098UG

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings