Improving Nighttime Access to Care and Treatment; Part 4-Haiti (INACT4-H)

June 26, 2025 updated by: University of Florida

Novel Approach to Improve Patient Care and Diarrheal Disease Research Using Mobile Technology in Haiti

Children in resource-limited settings who develop illness at night are often isolated from care, resulting in progression to an emergency. A telemedicine and medication delivery service (TMDS) is a viable healthcare delivery option to bridge the gap in nighttime care. This interrupted time series study (pre/post) will evaluate a digital clinical decision-support (dCDS) tool. The objective is to assess if the tool is associated with an improvement in guideline adherence by TMDS providers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Acute respiratory infection and diarrheal disease are the two leading causes of pediatric death between 1 month and 5 years of age globally. These common problems have well-established low-cost treatments. However, these treatments are most effective when administered early which is difficult in resource-limited settings, especially at night. Based on five years of formative NIH-funded research, the team has built a Telemedicine and Medication Delivery Service (TMDS) in Haiti to improve nighttime access to care and treatment for children called MotoMeds. The strategic plan is to design, deploy and evaluate MotoMeds by conducting four clinical studies titled Improving Nighttime Access to Care and Treatment (INACT1/2/3/4) in Haiti. INACT1-H was a needs assessment (2018-2019), INACT2-H was a pre-pilot deployment of MotoMeds that compared the congruence of clinical assessments at the call-center to in-person household assessments by providers (2019-2020), and INACT3-H was a pilot of a scalable model of MotoMeds that had provider assessment only at the call-center for most non-severe cases and had provider assessment at both the call-center and household for some non-severe/ moderate cases. In addition, the central call center serviced a geographically distant delivery zone, demonstrating proof of concept for a fully scaled model. INACT4-H will evaluate a digital clinical decision support (dCDS) tool designed for use at a pediatric TMDS in an interrupted time series study. The pre-intervention is use of the existing paper CDS tool and the intervention is use of the dCDS tool. This initiative is significant because it uses telemedicine and medication delivery to address one of the most fundamental challenges in pediatrics early access to pediatric healthcare.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7124

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Molly B Klarman, MPH
  • Phone Number: 509 4600-7486
  • Email: mklarman@ufl.edu

Study Locations

  • Haiti
    • Ouest
      • Gressier, Ouest, Haiti, HT-6160
        • Recruiting
        • CV Foundation
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria for child, parent/guardian participants:

  • Children 10 years of age or younger with an acute illness
  • Parent/guardian contacts the TMDS in regards to the illness during hours of operation
  • Parental/guardian agreement to a waiver of documentation of consent when contact is by phone only OR written consent/assent at the household from the parent/guardian and child (7yrs and older) for participants who receive a household visit.

Exclusion criteria for child, parent/guardian participants:

  • No consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: paper-based clinical decision support tool
Providers at the TMDS will use the existing paper-based clinical decision support tools to consult/examine patients.
Other: paper-based clinical decision support (dCDS) tool
The paper based clinical decision support tools currently employed at the TMDS that are used to triage, assess and generate treatment plans for pediatric patients.
Experimental: digital clinical decision support (dCDS) tool
Providers at the TMDS will use the new digital clinical decision support (dCDS) tool to consult/examine patients.
Other: digital clinical decision support (dCDS) tool
The intervention is a digitized version of the paper based clinical decision support tools currently employed at the TMDS that are used to triage, assess and generate treatment plans for pediatric patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in provider guideline adherence rates at the call center between use of the paper and digital clinical decision support tools (CDS).
Time Frame: Two 16 month intervention periods less the 2 week wash out.
We will evaluate the change in rates of provider guideline adherence at the call center between the 16 month period (minus 2 week wash out) where the existing paper CDS tools are used and the 16 month period (minus 2 week wash out) where the new digital CDS tools are used. Guideline adherence will be measured using the following features of the assessment and plan; severity determination and danger signs, provider household visit determination, and antibiotic and zinc prescriptions.
Two 16 month intervention periods less the 2 week wash out.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enumeration of clinical status of participants at 10-day follow up
Time Frame: 10 days
All families will receive a follow-up call at 10 days post initial call to MotoMeds. The family will be asked about the clinical status of the child with regards to the initial medical complaint (resolved, better, same, worse, died).
10 days
Change in call duration between use of the paper and digital clinical decision support tools (CDS).
Time Frame: From time incoming call is answered until treatment plan has been explained (approximately 10 to 20 minutes).
Call duration is defined as the time elapsed from once the provider starts consulting the patient (filling out the case report form or face sheet) until the provider finishes the assessment and has communicated the treatment plan to the caller (prior to the consent process). The mean call duration while using the paper CDS will be compared to the mean call duration while using the digital CDS tool.
From time incoming call is answered until treatment plan has been explained (approximately 10 to 20 minutes).
Change in time to medication delivery between use of the paper and digital clinical decision support tools (CDS).
Time Frame: From time incoming call is answered until medication is delivered to the participant's home (approximately 45-120 minutes).
Time to medication delivery is defined as the time from once the provider starts consulting the patient (filling out the case report form or face sheet) until the driver (or driver and provider) arrives at the patient's home for delivery. The mean time to delivery while using the paper CDS will be compared to the mean time to delivery while using the digital CDS tool.
From time incoming call is answered until medication is delivered to the participant's home (approximately 45-120 minutes).

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative feedback from TMDS providers
Time Frame: Approximately 1 hour
Qualitative feedback from the provider perspective framed with respect to content, usability of the user-interface (e.g., haptic vs typed data entry, navigation), satisfaction and technical challenges (connectivity, malfunctions, inter-operability).
Approximately 1 hour
Change in provider guideline adherence rates at the household between use of the paper and digital clinical decision support tools (CDS).
Time Frame: Two 16 month intervention periods less the 2 week wash out.
We will evaluate the change in rates of provider guideline adherence at the household between the 16 month period (minus 2 week wash out) where the existing paper CDS tools are used and the 16 month period (minus 2 week wash out) where the new digital CDS tools are used. Guideline adherence will be measured using the following features of the assessment and plan; severity determination and danger signs, provider household visit determination, and antibiotic and zinc prescriptions.
Two 16 month intervention periods less the 2 week wash out.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eric J Nelson, MD PhD, University of Florida

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 27, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB202201220
  • R21TW012332 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigator will share a de-identified data set in a data depository such as Dryad.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will likely be made available within 1 year of the conclusion of the study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The de-identified dataset will be deposited in a publicly available data depository such as Dryad.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings