Motor Imagery and Motor Execution Based BCI in Stroke (BCI-MIME)
Effect of Motor Imagery and Motor Execution-based Brain Computer Interface on Motor Rehabilitation in Subacute Ischemic Stroke
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ziwen Yuan, MD
- Phone Number: +862985324834
- Email: yuanziwen@xjtufh.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Shaanxi
-
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710049
- Recruiting
- First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an JiaoTong University
-
Contact:
- Ziwen Yuan, MD
- Phone Number: +862985324834
- Email: yuanziwen@xjtufh.edu.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 35-79 years old;
- Patients with first ischemic stroke onset from 2 week to 3 months;
- Hemiplegia with upper limb strength grades 1-3;
- Consciousness, sitting balance level 1 or above, can cooperate with assessment and treatment;
- The patient or its authorized agent signs the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severely impaired cognition (MMSE<20), unable to pay attention to and understand screen information;
- Severe pain, spasticity and limited mobility of upper extremity.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: BCI
The experimental group was trained with BCI-controlled pedaling rehabilitation training system.
Patients wore EEG caps and were instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements.
The greater the patients' movement intention, the higher the Mscore of movement intention index on the monitor and the faster the pedaling speed.
In addition, the movements on the monitor are synchronized with the actual movements, and the system provides audio and text feedback according to the patient's performance.
|
We designed a motor imagery and motor execution-based BCI-controlled pedaling rehabilitation training system.
Patients wore EEG caps and were instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements.
The greater the patients' movement intention, the higher the Mscore of movement intention index on the monitor and the faster the pedaling speed
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham BCI
In the control group, the training equipment and scenario were the same as in the experimental group, and the patients wore EEG caps and were also instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements.
However, the system was changed to only record the EEG signal without controlling the pedaling equipment, and the Mscore score and pedaling speed displayed by the equipment in real time were pre-set data of the training performance of the previous pretest patients, i.e., sham neurofeedback.
|
The training equipment was the same, but the program was changed to record only the EEG signal without controlling the pedaling equipment, and the Mscore score and pedaling speed displayed by the equipment in real time were pre-set training performance data of the previous pretest patients, i.e., sham neurofeedback.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The change of Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment of upper limb
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
|
The score range is 0-66 points, the higher the score, the better the motor function of upper limb.
|
Three weeks after enrollment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
|
The Berg Balance Scale contains 14 items.
The score range is 0-56 points, the higher the score, the better the balance function.
|
Three weeks after enrollment
|
|
modified Barthel Index
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
|
The modified Barthel Index is for assessing activities of daily living.
The score range is 0-100 points, the higher the score, the better the function.
|
Three weeks after enrollment
|
|
P300 latency
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
|
P300 is an auditory evoked event related potential, it can be used to assess neural activity associated with cognitive processes.
The latency is about 250ms-800ms.
|
Three weeks after enrollment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- XJTU1AF2022LSK-422
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.