Motor Imagery and Motor Execution Based BCI in Stroke (BCI-MIME)

Effect of Motor Imagery and Motor Execution-based Brain Computer Interface on Motor Rehabilitation in Subacute Ischemic Stroke

About 50% of stroke patients are unable to live independently because of residual disability. Brain-computer interface (BCI) is based on closed-loop theory, which facilitates neurological remodeling by establishing a bridge between central and peripheral connections. Studies have confirmed that BCI real-time neurofeedback training system based on motor imagery alone can effectively improve patients' motor function. So, is the benefit greater if motor imagery is combined with motor execution? Current conclusions are mixed. In addition, previous studies and our preliminary study found that prefrontal Fp1 and Fp2 areas play an important role in motor recovery after stroke, and they are involved in motor imagery, motor execution, attention and other behavioral processes. Therefore, we designed a BCI training system based on motor imagery and motor execution with prefrontal electroencephalogram (EEG) signals as the modulatory target. This was a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Patients in the test group performed BCI-controlled upper extremity motor imagery + upper extremity pedaling training. The control group had the same equipment and training scenario, and patients were also asked to imagine the upper extremity pedaling movement with effort, and patients also wore EEG caps, but the EEG signals were only recorded without controlling the pedaling equipment. After 3 weeks of treatment, we observed the changes of motor and cognitive functions as well as fNIRS-related brain network characteristics in both groups.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710049
        • Recruiting
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an JiaoTong University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 35-79 years old;
  • Patients with first ischemic stroke onset from 2 week to 3 months;
  • Hemiplegia with upper limb strength grades 1-3;
  • Consciousness, sitting balance level 1 or above, can cooperate with assessment and treatment;
  • The patient or its authorized agent signs the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severely impaired cognition (MMSE<20), unable to pay attention to and understand screen information;
  • Severe pain, spasticity and limited mobility of upper extremity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BCI
The experimental group was trained with BCI-controlled pedaling rehabilitation training system. Patients wore EEG caps and were instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements. The greater the patients' movement intention, the higher the Mscore of movement intention index on the monitor and the faster the pedaling speed. In addition, the movements on the monitor are synchronized with the actual movements, and the system provides audio and text feedback according to the patient's performance.
We designed a motor imagery and motor execution-based BCI-controlled pedaling rehabilitation training system. Patients wore EEG caps and were instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements. The greater the patients' movement intention, the higher the Mscore of movement intention index on the monitor and the faster the pedaling speed
Sham Comparator: Sham BCI
In the control group, the training equipment and scenario were the same as in the experimental group, and the patients wore EEG caps and were also instructed to imagine upper limb pedaling movements. However, the system was changed to only record the EEG signal without controlling the pedaling equipment, and the Mscore score and pedaling speed displayed by the equipment in real time were pre-set data of the training performance of the previous pretest patients, i.e., sham neurofeedback.
The training equipment was the same, but the program was changed to record only the EEG signal without controlling the pedaling equipment, and the Mscore score and pedaling speed displayed by the equipment in real time were pre-set training performance data of the previous pretest patients, i.e., sham neurofeedback.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment of upper limb
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
The score range is 0-66 points, the higher the score, the better the motor function of upper limb.
Three weeks after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
The Berg Balance Scale contains 14 items. The score range is 0-56 points, the higher the score, the better the balance function.
Three weeks after enrollment
modified Barthel Index
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
The modified Barthel Index is for assessing activities of daily living. The score range is 0-100 points, the higher the score, the better the function.
Three weeks after enrollment
P300 latency
Time Frame: Three weeks after enrollment
P300 is an auditory evoked event related potential, it can be used to assess neural activity associated with cognitive processes. The latency is about 250ms-800ms.
Three weeks after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Motor imagery and motor execution based BCI

Subscribe