Effects of Kilohertz-frequency and Low-frequency Current on Triceps Surae
Effects of Different Modalities of Medium and Low Frequency Electrical Stimulation in the Generation of Evoked Torque, Sensory Discomfort, Muscle Fatigue and Inheritance Peripheral Oxygen Supply in the Triceps Surae Muscle.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: João LQ Durigan, PhD
- Phone Number: +55 61 3107-8450
- Email: joaodurigan@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Luis AO Soares, Graduate
- Phone Number: +55 61 3107-8450
- Email: luisandreoliveirasoares@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
DF
-
Brasília, DF, Brazil, 72220-275
- Recruiting
- Faculty of Ceilandia UnB
-
Contact:
- JOAO LUIZ Q DURIGAN, PhD
- Phone Number: 55613107-8418
- Email: joaodurigan@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- JOAO LUIZ Q DURIGAN
- Phone Number: +556198140862455613107-8418
- Email: joaodurigan@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female and male, aged between 18-40 years;
- Be classified as physically active according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ);
- The practice of just recreational physical activity;
- Achieve a minimum torque of 20% of the MVIC during the NMES;
- Be at least three months without strength training;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Present musculoskeletal dysfunction that may interfere with the tests, present intolerance to NMES in the triceps surae muscle;
- Use analgesics, antidepressants, tranquilizers, or other centrally acting agents;
- Present cardiovascular or peripheral vascular problems, chronic diseases, neurological or muscle disorders that may impair the complete execution of the study design by the volunteer;
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Russian current 10%
Subjects will receive a interventions (Russian Current at 10% duty cycle).
Evoked torque, muscle fatigue, sensory discomfort, and peripheral oxygen extraction will be evaluated.
|
Russian current with 2500 Hz, modulated in bursts of 50 Hz, 200 µs and 10% duty cycle - 2 ms bursts and 18 ms interbusrts
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Aussie current 10%
Subjects will receive a interventions (Aussie Current at 10% duty cycle).
Evoked torque, muscle fatigue, sensory discomfort, and peripheral oxygen extraction will be evaluated.
|
Aussie current with 1000 Hz, modulated in bursts of 50 Hz, 500 µs and 10% duty cycle - 2 ms bursts and 18 ms interbusrts
|
|
Experimental: Pulsed current 500 µs phase
Subjects will receive a interventions (Pulsed current with 50 Hz, 500 µs phase).
Evoked torque, muscle fatigue, sensory discomfort, and peripheral oxygen extraction will be evaluated.
|
Pulsed current, modulated in 50 Hz, 500 µs
|
|
Experimental: Pulsed current 200 µs phase
Subjects will receive a interventions (Pulsed current with 50 Hz, 200 µs phase).
Evoked torque, muscle fatigue, sensory discomfort, and peripheral oxygen extraction will be evaluated.
|
Pulsed current, modulated in 50 Hz, 200 µs
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Submaximal voluntary isometric contraction of the triceps surae
Time Frame: 2 minutes
|
Expressed in muscle strength, assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer
|
2 minutes
|
|
Maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the triceps surae
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Expressed in muscle strength, assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer
|
5 minutes
|
|
Maximum evoked torque
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Expressed by the description of muscle strength generated by electrical stimulation assessed by the isokinetic dynamometer
|
5 minutes
|
|
Muscle fatigue assessment before the muscle fatigue protocol
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Expressed by mechanical properties of plantar flexors and central activation relationship using the contraction interpolation technique
|
10 minutes
|
|
Assessment of muscle fatigue during the muscle fatigue protocol
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
Expressed by the muscle fatigue index through the decline in torque evoked from the beginning to the end of the protocol
|
20 minutes
|
|
Muscle fatigue assessment during the muscle fatigue protocol
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
Expressed by the decline in torque-time-integral from the beginning to the end of the protocol
|
20 minutes
|
|
Torque evoked during the fatigue protocol
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Expressed by the description of muscle strength generated by electrical stimulation assessed by the isokinetic dynamometer
|
15 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Peripheral oxygen extraction
Time Frame: 40 minutes
|
Expressed by peripheral oxygen consumption assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy from the beginning to the end of the sessions
|
40 minutes
|
|
Electromyographic signals
Time Frame: 40 minutes
|
Expressed by the raw values of RMS and Median Frequency within a range of 500 ms throughout the entire session
|
40 minutes
|
|
Sensory discomfort during maximum evoked torques
Time Frame: 10 seconds
|
Measured through the Visual Analog Scale (1 - 10 cm) where 0 represents no discomfort and 10 represents greater discomfort
|
10 seconds
|
|
Sensory discomfort during fatigue protocol
Time Frame: 10 seconds
|
Measured through the Visual Analog Scale (1 - 10 cm) where 0 represents no discomfort and 10 represents greater discomfort
|
10 seconds
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: João LQ Durigan, PhD, University of Brasilia
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aldayel A, Jubeau M, McGuigan M, Nosaka K. Comparison between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation for muscle and systemic acute responses. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Sep;109(3):735-44. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00189.2010. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
- Ward AR, Lucas-Toumbourou S, McCarthy B. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of medium-frequency alternating current and TENS. Physiotherapy. 2009 Dec;95(4):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
- Martin A, Grospretre S, Vilmen C, Guye M, Mattei JP, LE Fur Y, Bendahan D, Gondin J. The Etiology of Muscle Fatigue Differs between Two Electrical Stimulation Protocols. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Aug;48(8):1474-84. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000930.
- Neyroud D, Dodd D, Gondin J, Maffiuletti NA, Kayser B, Place N. Wide-pulse-high-frequency neuromuscular stimulation of triceps surae induces greater muscle fatigue compared with conventional stimulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 May 15;116(10):1281-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01015.2013. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
- Baldi JC, Jackson RD, Moraille R, Mysiw WJ. Muscle atrophy is prevented in patients with acute spinal cord injury using functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord. 1998 Jul;36(7):463-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100679.
- Arpin DJ, Forrest G, Harkema SJ, Rejc E. Submaximal Marker for Investigating Peak Muscle Torque Using Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2019 Mar 19;36(6):930-936. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5848. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
- Pinto Damo NL, Modesto KA, Neto IVS, Bottaro M, Babault N, Durigan JLQ. Effects of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on submaximal and maximum torque, efficiency, and discomfort: a randomized crossover trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
- da Silva VZ, Durigan JL, Arena R, de Noronha M, Gurney B, Cipriano G Jr. Current evidence demonstrates similar effects of kilohertz-frequency and low-frequency current on quadriceps evoked torque and discomfort in healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(8):533-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1064191. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
- Bellew JW, Cayot T, Brown K, Blair C, Dishion T, Ortman B, Reel A. Changes in microvascular oxygenation and total hemoglobin concentration of the vastus lateralis during neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Aug;37(8):926-934. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1652945. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 67915523.1.0000.8093
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.