The Effect of Physical Therapy Program and Erector Spina Plane Block in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Combination With Physical Therapy on Pain, Disability, and Quality of Life in Patients With Degenerative Scoliosis: Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ozge Gulsum Illeez
- Phone Number: +905326255684
- Email: ozgeilleez@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Yunus Emre Doğan
- Phone Number: +905060512500
- Email: ynsemredogan91@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34752
- Farih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being 60 years or older
- Having a scoliosis of 10 degrees or more in the lumbar region according to the measurement made with the cobb method
- Having pain in the axial waist or radiating from the waist to the leg
- Pain that persists for at least 3 months
- NRS > 4
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic or local infection at the injection site
- Past or current history of malignant disease
- Presence of neurological or orthopedic disease
- Presence of uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus
- Presence of severe heart failure
- Presence of bleeding diathesis
- Anticoagulant use
- Lidocaine allergy
- Psychiatric disorder or mental problem
- inflammatory spine pain
- Severe osteoporosis / previous vertebral fracture
- Body mass index >35
- Having had previous surgery on the lumbar region
- Injection was applied to the waist region within 6 months or physical have been treated
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: physical therapy
The physical therapy program is planned as a total of 15 sessions in the lumbar region, each session consisting of TENS (50-100 Hz stimulation frequency, 200 µs pulse duration, intensity is increased as much as the patient could tolerate, 20 minutes in total), hotpack (to be placed on the painful area, 20 minutes), US (1 mHz frequency, 10 minutes, 1.5 watt/cm2 intensity)
|
The physical therapy program is planned as a total of 15 sessions in the lumbar region, each session consisting of TENS (50-100 Hz stimulation frequency, 200 µs pulse duration, intensity is increased as much as the patient could tolerate, 20 minutes in total), hotpack (to be placed on the painful area, 20 minutes), US (1 mHz frequency, 10 minutes, 1.5 watt/cm2 intensity).
|
|
Active Comparator: physical therapy + espb
same physical therapy program, in addition Ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB is performed using an in-line cephalic approach, and after contacting the corner of the L3 transverse process, a small dose of saline is injected into the fascial space between the L3 transverse process and the erector spinae muscles to "lift off" the fascia.
After verification, a mixture of 20 mL of 1% lidocaine and 3 mg betamethasone is administered for unilateral injection.
The procedure is performed bilaterally.
|
the same physical therapy program, in addition Ultrasound-guided lumbar ESPB is performed using an in-line cephalic approach, and after contacting the corner of the L3 transverse process, a small dose of saline is injected into the fascial space between the L3 transverse process and the erector spinae muscles to "lift off" the fascia.
After verification, a mixture of 20 mL of 1% lidocaine and 3 mg betamethasone is administered for unilateral injection.
The procedure is performed bilaterally.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
|
Day 0
|
|
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: 1 hour after injection
|
Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
|
1 hour after injection
|
|
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: 1 week after physical treatment
|
Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
|
1 week after physical treatment
|
|
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: 1 month after physical treatment
|
Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
|
1 month after physical treatment
|
|
NRS (Numeric Rating Scale)
Time Frame: 3 month after physical treatment
|
Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
|
3 month after physical treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
SRS-22
Time Frame: Day 0
|
22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy.
Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item.
|
Day 0
|
|
SRS-22
Time Frame: 1 week after physical treatment
|
22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy.
Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item.
|
1 week after physical treatment
|
|
SRS-22
Time Frame: 1 month after physical treatment
|
22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy.
Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item.
|
1 month after physical treatment
|
|
SRS-22
Time Frame: 3 month after physical treatment
|
22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy.
Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item.
|
3 month after physical treatment
|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5.
The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst.
|
Day 0
|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 week after physical treatment
|
Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5.
The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst.
|
1 week after physical treatment
|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1 month after physical treatment
|
Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5.
The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst.
|
1 month after physical treatment
|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 3 month after physical treatment
|
Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5.
The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst.
|
3 month after physical treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Ozge Gulsum Illeez, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Taining and Research Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.015. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
- Graham RB, Sugrue PA, Koski TR. Adult Degenerative Scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Apr;29(3):95-107. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000367.
- Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Ciftci B, Celik M, Karaca O. Continuous ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block for the management of chronic pain. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Aug;38(4):395-396. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 15. No abstract available.
- Akyuz ME, Firidin MN. Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative persistent low back pain in lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J. 2022 Jul;31(7):1873-1878. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07212-z. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
- Durmus IE, Surucu S, Muz A, Takmaz SA. The effectiveness of erector spinae plane block in patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):138-143. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202301_30864.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ozgeilleez1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.